Showing posts with label Global Housing Watch. Show all posts
Friday, July 22, 2022
On cross-country:
On the US:
On China
On other countries:
On cross-country:
Posted by 7:59 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Wednesday, July 20, 2022
From the IMF’s latest report on Germany:
“The authorities have appropriately tightened macroprudential policy in the face of house price risks, but further actions are needed. Rapid rises in housing prices (12.4 percent between 2021Q4 and 2020Q4) have led to residential real estate valuations above fundamental levels for Germany overall, and even greater misalignment in larger cities. Nationwide, price-to-rent and price-to-income indicators suggested deviations from the long-run average of about 37 and 21 percent, respectively at end-2021, while estimates of an econometric model suggest overvaluations of 10–15 percent at 2021Q3. Meanwhile, a city-level panel model suggests greater overvaluation in the largest cities. Mortgage origination has also been strong and lending standards appear somewhat loose in certain segments. For example, according to different private sector data sources, between 7 and 20 percent of mortgage loans exceed the underlying property value (e.g., Text Figure 11). With these vulnerabilities in mind, the authorities appropriately raised the counter-cyclical capital buffer to 0.75 percent, from zero previously, and introduced a sectoral systemic risk buffer of two percent on loans secured by domestic residential real estate to apply from February 1, 2023. The authorities have also cautioned banks against taking excessive risks in mortgage lending. However, legal concerns and a lack of comprehensive data on lending standards remain obstacles to the activation of borrower-based measures, like the imposition of limits on loan-to-value ratios on new lending. As noted in the FSAP, precautionary use of borrower-based measures is warranted, and the authorities should remove obstacles to their activation by modifying the law on borrower-based measures, while in the interim strengthening guidance on lending standards (for example, encouraging banks to adhere to loan-to-value ratio limits through issuing a Guidance Note to banks). The authorities are also urged to accelerate the closure of data gaps and add income-based measures into the macroprudential toolkit.
Authorities’ Views
While generally sharing staff’s assessment of financial sector health and recommendations, the authorities assessed that risks in the housing market do not warrant the activation of borrower-based measures at this juncture. The authorities appreciated the FSAP’s stress tests of bank solvency and liquidity and found the results to be in line with their expectations. They are aware of U.S. dollar liquidity risks at some LSIs but judge that these are already sufficiently managed in the supervisory process. They emphasized the risk-sharing that takes place between savings and cooperative banks and their regional wholesale bank partners. The authorities highlighted the appropriateness of the macroprudential policy package announced by BaFin in January 2022. They noted that important data gaps on lending standards will be closed in 2023 and legislative proposals are being drafted to add income-based instruments to the toolkit. Furthermore, the Bundesbank has set up a project dedicated to monitoring the effects of the macroprudential policy package—inter alia its effects on lending standards. Existing private sector data on LTV and DSTI ratios currently provide mixed signals. On financial safety nets, the authorities considered that maintaining the existing multiple deposit guarantee schemes appropriately reflects the three-pillar structure of the German banking system.
From the IMF’s latest report on Germany:
“The authorities have appropriately tightened macroprudential policy in the face of house price risks, but further actions are needed. Rapid rises in housing prices (12.4 percent between 2021Q4 and 2020Q4) have led to residential real estate valuations above fundamental levels for Germany overall, and even greater misalignment in larger cities. Nationwide, price-to-rent and price-to-income indicators suggested deviations from the long-run average of about 37 and 21 percent,
Posted by 1:16 PM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, July 15, 2022
On cross-country:
On the US:
On China
On other countries:
On cross-country:
On the US:
Posted by 5:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Tuesday, July 12, 2022
From the IMF’s latest report on the US;
“The housing market has been on a steep upward trajectory. Nationwide, average prices are 38 percent above where they were at end-2019 and prices are relatively high as a share of both rents and household income. Leverage, though, has been contained by relatively low loan-to-value ratios and conservative underwriting standards (a legacy of the post-financial crisis reforms). In addition, refinancing activity over the past few years has reduced average mortgage payments to all-time lows as a share of disposable income. As such, financial stability risks emanating from the housing market appear to be contained. However, there are important social concerns linked to the worsening in housing affordability, particularly for lower income households.”
From the IMF’s latest report on the US;
“The housing market has been on a steep upward trajectory. Nationwide, average prices are 38 percent above where they were at end-2019 and prices are relatively high as a share of both rents and household income. Leverage, though, has been contained by relatively low loan-to-value ratios and conservative underwriting standards (a legacy of the post-financial crisis reforms). In addition, refinancing activity over the past few years has reduced average mortgage payments to all-time lows as a share of disposable income.
Posted by 5:50 PM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, July 8, 2022
From the IMF’s latest report on Ireland:
“The pandemic has exacerbated housing market’s imbalances, contributing to accelerating prices despite the recent acceleration in housing construction. Double-digit price growth has further pressured affordability as price-to-income and price-to-rent ratios increased sharply in recent quarters. House completions recovered in 2021 but were still below 2019 levels.
Housing commencements have accelerated to the highest number since the GFC, but the construction sector is facing combined headwinds of input cost inflation and labor shortages.
CRE activities performed better than expected during the pandemic. Investment in the sector was exceptionally strong in 2021 and this momentum is expected to continue in 2022. The polarization between different sectors that characterized the Irish property investment market stems from the higher return to investment in CRE than residential, partly due to the strong growth of MNEs, Brexit-related relocations to Ireland, and businesses’ general resilience despite the pandemic.
Supply-side policies should be further strengthened. The government has introduced a comprehensive fiscal and regulatory package (Housing for All18), costing close to 1 percent of GDP annually, to address the affordable housing shortage. The package includes measures to improve zoning, planning, land availability, and social housing. Timely implementation of these measures is needed and should be accompanied by additional policies aimed at raising productivity in the construction sector. The “First Home” affordable purchase shared-equity scheme (starting in 2022:Q3) aims to support first home buyers. However, it does not address the supply bottlenecks. While the scheme is partly targeted and limited in size, if expanded it can put further upward pressure on prices.
Improving construction productivity is needed to bolster housing supply. The construction sector is fragmented, lagging on digitalization, and faces high input costs and labor shortages. Complex and lengthy processes for obtaining occupational licenses, with excessively long apprenticeship requirements, raise barriers to entry and contribute to substantial bottlenecks and high costs of construction. In recent years, the government has taken some steps toward digitalization of the construction sector, upskilling and reskilling workers, including by increasing the number of apprenticeship centers. There is also a need to streamline the lengthy, cumbersome, and uncertain zoning and permit processes.
The government is implementing a set of comprehensive measures under “Housing for All – A New Housing Plan for Ireland” aimed at alleviating the housing shortage. Establishment of the Construction Sector Innovation and Digital Adoption Subgroup by the government and the industry is welcome to deliver on the seven priority actions detailed in the Building Innovation Report. The Construction Sector Group ensures regular and open dialogue between government and industry on how best to achieve and maintain a sustainable and innovative construction sector in order to successfully deliver on the commitments in Project Ireland 2040.”
From the IMF’s latest report on Ireland:
“The pandemic has exacerbated housing market’s imbalances, contributing to accelerating prices despite the recent acceleration in housing construction. Double-digit price growth has further pressured affordability as price-to-income and price-to-rent ratios increased sharply in recent quarters. House completions recovered in 2021 but were still below 2019 levels.
Housing commencements have accelerated to the highest number since the GFC, but the construction sector is facing combined headwinds of input cost inflation and labor shortages.
Posted by 7:44 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Subscribe to: Posts