The Unassuming Economist

From a paper by Aariya Sen, and Rudra Sensarma:

“Recent studies have examined the impact of monetary policy on economic inequality, but have focused on advanced economies and wealth inequality. We analyse the impact of monetary policy on income and consumption inequality estimated from a household level dataset in India. We apply Sign-Restricted VAR and Local Projection models to monthly data for 2014–2023. We show that contractionary monetary policy worsens consumption inequality while reducing income inequality. We also find that while restrictive monetary policy reduces capital income inequality and wage income inequality it widens the gap between capital and wage income earners. Moreover, monetary policy exhibits asymmetric effects, suggesting trade-offs for the central bank.”

From Humanity on Trial:

“As discussed on the environmental integration page, cognitive environmental integration has two dimensions: the internal dimension refers to the existence or creation of an overarching cognitive framework that can provide guidance on what environmental processes, limits, principles or imperatives need to be respected to preserve the environmental systems on which life, including human life, depends; the external dimension refers to the integration of those ‘parameters’ as core elements into the cognitive frameworks (ideologies; theories, management frameworks and other) that guide human behaviour, actions and practices in what are usually regarded non-environmental areas, such as economic thinking, ideas, theories or models guiding the development of energy systems, technology, agriculture, transport, the production and consumption of goods and services, the design and construction of buildings and the built-up environment, and any other areas that have (potentially) a significant impact on the environment.

It may surprise those who think that the creation and adoption of such an overarching cognitive environmental framework at the global level is a utopian idea that, in practice, this is an area of environmental integration in which global efforts have been relatively successful. I am referring here, in particular, to the rise of the notion of sustainable development and the extent to which it has been adopted by governments worldwide and international organisations.”

Continue reading here.

In 2012, the magazine Global Finance gave Stanley Fischer, then central bank governor of Israel, an A for his handling of the economy during the financial crisis. It was the fourth year in a row that Fischer had received an A. It’s a grade the former professor—who taught both Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke and European Central Bank (ECB) President Mario Draghi—cherishes: “Those were some tough tests we faced in Israel.”

Fischer stepped down as central bank governor in June this year after eight years in the job, bringing the curtain down on an extraordinary third act of his career. The second act was as the IMF’s second-in-command during the tumultuous period of financial crises in emerging markets from 1994 to 2001. This role as policymaker came after a rousing opening act in the 1970s and 1980s, during which Fischer established himself as a preeminent macroeconomist, one who defined the contours of the field through his scholarly work and textbooks. It speaks to Fischer’s success that stints as the World Bank’s chief economist in the 1980s and as vice chairman at Citigroup in the 2000s—which would be crowning achievements of many a career—come across as interludes between the main acts.­ For the full profile, continue reading here. 

Also, see an introduction to my profiles of economists.

From a paper by Kristin Forbes, Jongrim Ha, and M. Ayhan Kose:

“Central banks often face tradeoffs in how their monetary policy decisions impact economic activity (including employment), inflation and the price level. This paper assesses how these tradeoffs have evolved over time and varied across countries, with a focus on understanding the post-pandemic adjustment. To make these comparisons, we compile a cross-country, historical database of “rate cycles” (i.e., easing and tightening phases for monetary policy) for 24 advanced economies from 1970 through 2024. This allows us to quantify the characteristics of interest rate adjustments and corresponding macroeconomic outcomes and tradeoffs. We also calculate Sacrifice Ratios (output losses per inflation reduction) and document a historically low “sacrifice” during the post-pandemic tightening. This popular measure, however, ignores adjustments in the price level—which increased by more after the pandemic than over the past four decades. A series of regressions and simulations suggest monetary policy (and particularly the timing and aggressiveness of rate hikes) play a meaningful role in explaining these tradeoffs and how adjustments occur during tightening phases. Central bank credibility is the one measure we assess that corresponds to only positive outcomes and no difficult tradeoffs.”

From a paper by Ahmet Niyazi Özker:

“This study examines the possible inflation scale effects of inflation rates observed in emerging market economies on countries with similar economic structures to Turkey. For this purpose, the role of inflation in the emergence process of emerging market economies and the potential fiscal impact costs of this process on Turkey, especially on public finance and tax burden, are analysed. The study focuses on the approach that countries among emerging market economies are in an inflationary interaction through mutual scale effects, and that this interaction mutually increases their cost burdens. The research also tries to reveal whether these increasing fiscal burdens create a budgetary drag effect in Turkey and investigates at what scale levels these effects occur. In addition, the study also evaluates the financial consequences of the scale effects brought about by economic growth in Turkey as related to the inflation rates in Turkey. The findings in the survey reveal that inflation in Turkey is primarily structural, and an inflationary process prevails in which cost inflation remains relatively secondary. In other words, this structural reality shows that the Turkish economy is directly affected by structural inflation dynamics that are effective on a global scale and that this effect also causes an increase in financial burdens at the local level. When this situation is evaluated in terms of the fiscal tax burdens related to emerging markets, specifically in Turkey, it is understood that inflation is shaped not only by national internal dynamics but also by similar structural economic problems at the global level, and that the pressures to increase the inflation rates in Turkey also bring the potential for a possible fiscal drag on the agenda.”