Thursday, December 4, 2025
From a paper by Nigel Meade and Ciaran Driver:
“Policy makers are concerned with the accuracy of GDP forecasts and want to understand the reasons for the revision of forecasts. We study these issues by examining forecasts of annual UK GDP growth by a panel of agents, published monthly by HM Treasury. We focus on two main issues: the developing accuracy of the group-mean forecast as horizons shorten and the identification of information categories underlying agents’ forecast revisions. The accuracy of the group-mean forecast is poor; there is evidence of information rigidity in forecasts within the target year, and accuracy only improves in May of the target year when contemporary information flows lead to increased accuracy. We find a pessimism bias; the median errors of group-mean forecasts are increasingly positive for horizons shorter than 17months. We seek to explain revisions to both long- and short-horizon group-mean forecasts and individual agent forecasts. Modeling individual agents’ forecast revisions using a moving window, we note a consistent tendency by agents to revise their forecast towards the group-mean. Although their importance varied over time, the main information categories explaining revisions were, over longer horizons, the cost of finance, production, and a business confidence indicator. FX rates and inflation were influential over shorter horizons.”
From a paper by Nigel Meade and Ciaran Driver:
“Policy makers are concerned with the accuracy of GDP forecasts and want to understand the reasons for the revision of forecasts. We study these issues by examining forecasts of annual UK GDP growth by a panel of agents, published monthly by HM Treasury. We focus on two main issues: the developing accuracy of the group-mean forecast as horizons shorten and the identification of information categories underlying agents’
Posted by at 10:00 AM
Labels: Forecasting Forum
Saturday, November 29, 2025
On cross-country:
Working papers and conferences:
On China:
On Australia and New Zealand:
On other countries:
On cross-country:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, November 28, 2025
From a paper by Jérôme Creel and Jonas Kaiser:
“This paper introduces a novel application of the Updated Okun Method to estimate fiscal multipliers. By leveraging Okun’s Law to compute potential output and the output gap, we construct a new measure of the fiscal stance that improves transparency and interpretability. Applying this approach to France and Italy, we find that both economies were operating below full potential for most of the sample period, and that fiscal policy was more contractionary than standard estimates suggest. Our analysis reveals significant differences in fiscal multiplier effects across the two countries, with evidence of state-dependence in France, where fiscal policy is more effective during periods of economic slack, while no such variation is observed for Italy. These findings underscore the importance of aligning fiscal policy with economic conditions, particularly in the context of public debt sustainability debates.”
From a paper by Jérôme Creel and Jonas Kaiser:
“This paper introduces a novel application of the Updated Okun Method to estimate fiscal multipliers. By leveraging Okun’s Law to compute potential output and the output gap, we construct a new measure of the fiscal stance that improves transparency and interpretability. Applying this approach to France and Italy, we find that both economies were operating below full potential for most of the sample period,
Posted by at 9:50 AM
Labels: Inclusive Growth
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
On sales, permits, starts, and supply:
On other developments:
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Tuesday, November 25, 2025
From a paper by Puneet Vatsa, Gabriel Pino, Dragan Miljkovic:
“Using partially identified Bayesian structural vector autoregressions, we examine how food price shocks have influenced core inflation and inflation expectations in the United States since 1990. This is important, given the conspicuousness of food prices and the substantial share of food expenditure in households’ budgets. Shocks raised one-year expectations immediately, with effects lasting nine quarters; they increased core inflation with a short delay. Long-term expectations were largely unaffected. Counterfactuals show that one-year expectations would have been lower in 2020 and 2022 without these shocks. The findings suggest food price shocks warrant a measured response, not an overreaction, from central banks.”
From a paper by Puneet Vatsa, Gabriel Pino, Dragan Miljkovic:
“Using partially identified Bayesian structural vector autoregressions, we examine how food price shocks have influenced core inflation and inflation expectations in the United States since 1990. This is important, given the conspicuousness of food prices and the substantial share of food expenditure in households’ budgets. Shocks raised one-year expectations immediately, with effects lasting nine quarters; they increased core inflation with a short delay.
Posted by at 9:49 AM
Labels: Energy & Climate Change
Subscribe to: Posts