Wednesday, May 13, 2026
From a paper by Chandan Sethi, and Bibhuti Ranjan Mishra:
“This paper examines whether inflation targeting (IT) policies improve the macroeconomic performance of 28 Asian economies from 1998 to 2023. Specifically, it assesses the impact of IT on inflation, GDP growth, exchange rates and unemployment. The study employs two econometric methods: propensity score matching (PSM) and panel-corrected standard errors (PCSE). The findings suggest that adopting an IT regime can significantly reduce inflation and exchange rate volatility. However, IT has no significant effect on GDP growth. In contrast, results reveal a positive, statistically significant impact on unemployment, suggesting potential short-run labour-market trade-offs associated with disinflationary policies. These findings contribute to the ongoing debate on the effectiveness of IT by highlighting that its impact on real economic variables may vary across estimation approaches and underlying assumptions.”
From a paper by Chandan Sethi, and Bibhuti Ranjan Mishra:
“This paper examines whether inflation targeting (IT) policies improve the macroeconomic performance of 28 Asian economies from 1998 to 2023. Specifically, it assesses the impact of IT on inflation, GDP growth, exchange rates and unemployment. The study employs two econometric methods: propensity score matching (PSM) and panel-corrected standard errors (PCSE). The findings suggest that adopting an IT regime can significantly reduce inflation and exchange rate volatility.
Posted by at 6:19 AM
Labels: Forecasting Forum
Monday, May 11, 2026
From a paper by Jan Čapek | Jakub Chalmovianský | Vlastimil Reichel:
“This study systematically evaluates forecasting performance of 11 Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) and 2 Bayesian Vector Autoregression (BVAR) models during recessions and expansions in the US and the euro area. Results show that no single model dominates: parsimonious models perform well in stable periods and at short horizons, while richer DSGE specifications with financial frictions, flexible inflation targeting, or labor market dynamics improve forecasts during recessions. BVARs excel in interest rate forecasting, especially in expansions. Crisis‐specific extensions, such as COVID‐related shocks, yield temporary gains. Forecast accuracy depends on the economic state, variable, horizon, and evaluation metric, underscoring the need for a diversified, context‐dependent modeling toolkit.”
From a paper by Jan Čapek | Jakub Chalmovianský | Vlastimil Reichel:
“This study systematically evaluates forecasting performance of 11 Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) and 2 Bayesian Vector Autoregression (BVAR) models during recessions and expansions in the US and the euro area. Results show that no single model dominates: parsimonious models perform well in stable periods and at short horizons, while richer DSGE specifications with financial frictions, flexible inflation targeting,
Posted by at 10:48 AM
Labels: Forecasting Forum
Sunday, May 10, 2026
From a paper by Georgios Chortareas, Anastasios Evgenidis, and Apostolos Fasianos:
“This paper explores whether the transmission from monetary policy to income inequality may depend on the adoption of Inflation Targeting (IT) regimes. Using an interacted panel VAR, we find that expansionary monetary policy shocks reduce income inequality in countries that have switched to IT regimes. In contrast, in non-IT regimes the same shock is associated with a short-lived increase in income inequality. A decomposition of transmission channels indicates that the employment channel is the primary equalizing mechanism under IT, as expansionary shocks generate stronger improvements in labor market conditions. The financial channel operates in the opposite direction but is quantitatively smaller. We further show that the inequality-reducing effects of monetary policy are not replicated by other institutional features often associated with credibility, such as central bank transparency or central bank independence. Our findings are robust to alternative identification schemes, broader classifications of IT regimes, controls for self-selection into IT adoption, and to conditioning on different inflation environments.”
From a paper by Georgios Chortareas, Anastasios Evgenidis, and Apostolos Fasianos:
“This paper explores whether the transmission from monetary policy to income inequality may depend on the adoption of Inflation Targeting (IT) regimes. Using an interacted panel VAR, we find that expansionary monetary policy shocks reduce income inequality in countries that have switched to IT regimes. In contrast, in non-IT regimes the same shock is associated with a short-lived increase in income inequality.
Posted by at 7:43 AM
Labels: Inclusive Growth
Saturday, May 9, 2026
On cross-country:
Working papers and conferences:
On Australia and New Zealand:
On other countries:
On cross-country:
Working papers and conferences:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, May 8, 2026
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
On sales, permits, starts, and supply:
On other developments:
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Subscribe to: Posts