Monday, October 19, 2026
From a paper by Patricia Gomez-Gonzalez, Régis Kouassi, Jianhong Liu, Joseph Moussa, Jean-Marc Natal, Andrea Paloschi, and Evgenia Weaver:
“This paper proposes a new high-frequency structural vector autoregression model that can disentangle the drivers of oil and natural gas prices in real time. In particular, it separately identifies actual supply disruptions from geopolitical-risk shocks that raise expectations of future supply shortfalls. Local projection analysis shows that macroeconomic effects differ across shocks. Oil supply shocks significantly affect aggregate prices and unemployment, usual central banks’ policy targets, whereas geopolitical supply risk shocks have only short-lived effects on prices and no effect on unemployment. All gas shocks generate persistent effects on the price level, but muted effects on unemployment. Historical price decompositions using the high-frequency model during the Russia-Ukraine war and the 2026 Middle East war show that energy prices rise due to geopolitical risk before supply disruptions materialize. Even after disruptions occur, fears of additional shortages continue to exert upward pressure on prices. These findings highlight the importance for policymakers to distinguish realized supply disruptions from geopolitical supply risk shocks.”
From a paper by Patricia Gomez-Gonzalez, Régis Kouassi, Jianhong Liu, Joseph Moussa, Jean-Marc Natal, Andrea Paloschi, and Evgenia Weaver:
“This paper proposes a new high-frequency structural vector autoregression model that can disentangle the drivers of oil and natural gas prices in real time. In particular, it separately identifies actual supply disruptions from geopolitical-risk shocks that raise expectations of future supply shortfalls. Local projection analysis shows that macroeconomic effects differ across shocks.
Posted by at 6:06 AM
Labels: Energy & Climate Change
Saturday, October 17, 2026
On cross-country:
Working papers and conferences:
On China:
On other countries:
On cross-country:
Working papers and conferences:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, October 16, 2026
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
On sales, permits, starts, and supply:
On other developments:
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Tuesday, October 13, 2026
From a paper by Sergio De Nardis:
“The dichotomy between Purchasing Power Parities (PPPs) and national deflators in international comparisons of real variables (GDP per capita and productivity) has returned to center stage in the recent debate on the gap between the EU and the US. This dichotomy does not only concern comparisons between structurally different countries. It is also present, to a lesser but still significant extent, in Europe and with reference to the Italian economy. This paper shows how, over the period 2005-2023, Italy’s productivity performance compared to Germany and France is better if GDP is measured in PPPs (output side) rather than deflated with implicit prices from national accounts. The two types of measurement lead to dynamics that are difficult to reconcile. Examining the PPP-deflator gap, it is clear that this difference does not depend on the composition and structure of the weights used in constructing PPPs. Analysis of the expenditure categories that make up GDP and analysis of the specific household consumption items reveal a pervasive phenomenon, affecting both tradable and non-tradable products. It is argued that the structural similarity of economies lends robustness to PPPs. It is concluded that comparisons between countries under consideration based on data deflated with implicit prices from national accounts are less reliable, even in time series, than those based on PPPs due to the heterogeneous approaches of statistical offices in accounting for the quality of goods and services, the different granularity of underlying information, and the fixed structure of relative prices across economies.”
From a paper by Sergio De Nardis:
“The dichotomy between Purchasing Power Parities (PPPs) and national deflators in international comparisons of real variables (GDP per capita and productivity) has returned to center stage in the recent debate on the gap between the EU and the US. This dichotomy does not only concern comparisons between structurally different countries. It is also present, to a lesser but still significant extent, in Europe and with reference to the Italian economy.
Posted by at 10:59 AM
Labels: Inclusive Growth
Saturday, October 10, 2026
On cross-country:
Working papers and conferences:
On China:
On Australia and New Zealand:
On other countries:
On cross-country:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Uncategorized
Subscribe to: Posts