Wednesday, April 15, 2026
From a paper by Luis I. Jacome, Nicolas E. Magud, Samuel Pienknagura, and Martın Uribe:
“We explore the historical link between populist regimes, fiscal monetization, and inflation, and how these links affect monetary policy in the 21st century. Using data for a large set of advanced economies and emerging markets since 1960, we show that, historically, left-leaning populist regimes are linked to increases in central bank lending to the central government, a gauge of deficit monetization. In turn, central bank lending is associated with marked increases in inflation. We show that past exposure to populism that relied on deficit monetization affects the conduct of monetary policy today. Countries with a history of deficit monetization and left-wing populist regimes systematically respond more strongly to deviations of inflation expectations from target. This effect persists even after controlling for the direct effect of past inflation on monetary policy rules. In the context of the literature of experienced learning, this novel finding sheds light on the persistence of past populist policies—central banks operating under the shadow of past populist regimes that relied on inflation-prone deficit monetization continue today needing to send stronger signals of their independence and commitment to price stability to effectively anchor inflation expectations.”
From a paper by Luis I. Jacome, Nicolas E. Magud, Samuel Pienknagura, and Martın Uribe:
“We explore the historical link between populist regimes, fiscal monetization, and inflation, and how these links affect monetary policy in the 21st century. Using data for a large set of advanced economies and emerging markets since 1960, we show that, historically, left-leaning populist regimes are linked to increases in central bank lending to the central government,
Posted by at 6:11 AM
Labels: Forecasting Forum
From a paper by Giuseppe Pio Dachille, Antonio Dalla Zuanna, Monica Paiella, and Eliana Viviano:
“We quantify how the employment expansion accompanying Italy’s post-pandemic recovery mitigated the distributional consequences of the contemporaneous surge in prices, which disproportionately affected households at the bottom of the expenditure distribution. Using linked administrative employment records and household survey and expenditure data, we examine labour income dynamics, employment transitions, differential inflation exposure, and the redistributive role of the tax–benefit system for Italian households without pension or self-employment income over 2018–2023. Despite elevated inflation, households in the lowest expenditure quintile experienced gains in real labour income, whereas those higher in the distribution did not. The decline in inequality is driven primarily by employment entry among previously non-employed household members, while adjustments among continuously employed workers played a limited role. Extensive-margin gains reflect stronger demand for low-skilled labour rather than differential labour-supply responses to inflation. Microsimulations indicate that fiscal measures cushioned disposable incomes at the bottom but did not alter the central role of employment growth in shaping distributional outcomes.”
From a paper by Giuseppe Pio Dachille, Antonio Dalla Zuanna, Monica Paiella, and Eliana Viviano:
“We quantify how the employment expansion accompanying Italy’s post-pandemic recovery mitigated the distributional consequences of the contemporaneous surge in prices, which disproportionately affected households at the bottom of the expenditure distribution. Using linked administrative employment records and household survey and expenditure data, we examine labour income dynamics, employment transitions, differential inflation exposure, and the redistributive role of the tax–benefit system for Italian households without pension or self-employment income over 2018–2023.
Posted by at 6:09 AM
Labels: Inclusive Growth
From a paper by Maridueña-Larrea, Ángel and Martín-Román, Ángel L:
“This study assesses the empirical validity, heterogeneity, and spatial dependence of Okun’s Law
in a global setting. Using annual data for 163 countries over the period 1992–2023, we estimate
country-specific unemployment–output elasticities under two standard specifications (output-gap
and first-difference models) and allow for cyclical asymmetries by distinguishing expansionary and
recessionary phases. The results indicate that Okun’s coefficient is negative and statistically
significant in most countries, although its magnitude is highly heterogeneous and varies
systematically across income groups. Controlling for the common 2020 shock (COVID-19) does
not meaningfully alter statistical significance for most countries, but it generates economically
relevant shifts in the coefficient’s magnitude for a non-negligible subset, thus improving
cross-country comparability. We also document pronounced asymmetry: elasticities are, on
average, stronger during recessions than expansions, particularly among middle- and high-income
economies. Moran’s I statistics reveal positive and significant spatial autocorrelation in cyclical
sensitivities across alternative k-nearest-neighbour weighting matrices, with stronger dependence
during recessions. These findings motivate the design of countercyclical labour-market policies
tailored to structural heterogeneity and coordinated regionally during downturns.”
From a paper by Maridueña-Larrea, Ángel and Martín-Román, Ángel L:
“This study assesses the empirical validity, heterogeneity, and spatial dependence of Okun’s Law
in a global setting. Using annual data for 163 countries over the period 1992–2023, we estimate
country-specific unemployment–output elasticities under two standard specifications (output-gap
and first-difference models) and allow for cyclical asymmetries by distinguishing expansionary and
recessionary phases. The results indicate that Okun’s coefficient is negative and statistically
significant in most countries,
Posted by at 6:07 AM
Labels: Inclusive Growth
Saturday, April 11, 2026
On cross-country:
Working papers and conferences:
On other countries:
On cross-country:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, April 10, 2026
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
On sales, permits, starts, and supply:
On other developments:
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
On sales, permits, starts, and supply:
On other developments:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Subscribe to: Posts