Showing posts with label Global Housing Watch. Show all posts
Monday, September 19, 2022
From the IMF’s latest report on Norway:
“Further improvements were made to the macroprudential policy framework, but some recommendations remain outstanding, especially with respect to housing (Annex IV). Following the introduction of the consumer credit regulation in 2019 and the establishment of credit registries, the volume of consumer credit declined, and there are now substantially fewer borrowers with very high consumer debt. Temporary relaxation of mortgage lending regulation that facilitated debt restructuring and home-equity withdrawals ended, and support measures to households were rolled back. Staff continues to recommend to permanently preserve tighter mortgage regulation limits for Oslo now that the recovery is sustained and given still high house price growth in the capital (Box 3). As emphasized during pervious consultations, other targeted measures, including easing restrictions on the supply of new housing, altering regulations to boost construction efficiency, and curbing demand through a gradual phasing out of mortgage interest deductibility should also be implemented. In September 2021, Norges Bank was granted decision-making responsibility for setting the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB), which is set four times a year, and advisory responsibility for the systemic risk buffer, in line with the 2020 FSAP recommendation. Recommendation powers on other tools should also be granted (Annex IV).”
From the IMF’s latest report on Norway:
“Further improvements were made to the macroprudential policy framework, but some recommendations remain outstanding, especially with respect to housing (Annex IV). Following the introduction of the consumer credit regulation in 2019 and the establishment of credit registries, the volume of consumer credit declined, and there are now substantially fewer borrowers with very high consumer debt. Temporary relaxation of mortgage lending regulation that facilitated debt restructuring and home-equity withdrawals ended,
Posted by 10:07 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Saturday, September 17, 2022
Posted by 8:05 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, September 16, 2022
Conferences:
On cross-country:
On the US—developments on house prices and rent:
On the US—other developments:
On China:
On other countries:
Conferences:
On cross-country:
Posted by 5:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, September 9, 2022
On cross-country:
On the US—developments on house prices and rent:
On the US—other developments:
On China:
On other countries:
On cross-country:
Posted by 5:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Saturday, September 3, 2022
From the Grumpy Economist:
“This beautiful graph comes from calculatedriskblog.com. (Courtesy Andy Atkeson who used it in a nice discussion of a great paper by Ivan Werning at the Minneapolis Fed Foundations of Monetary Policy conference.)
The central lines that don’t move so much are the average rent. This is the quantity used by the Bureau of Labor Statistics to compute the consumer price index. The blue and yellow lines are the rent of new leases.
The first thing this informs is the economic theory of “sticky prices.” Apartment rents are a classic “sticky price;” the rent is fixed in dollar terms for a year. So, landlords deciding how much rent to charge, and people deciding how much they’re willing to pay, balance rents now vs. higher rents in the future. If everyone believes that inflation will be 10% over the next year, then it makes sense to raise the rent 5% now, and to pay the 5% higher rent, because the savings at the end of the year balance the cost in the beginning. (Obviously, the economics are much more subtle than this, but you get the idea.) And Voila’, you see it.
The graph also says there is some predictability and nomentum to inflation. Inflation should not be a surprise to forecasters. If you see rents on new leases much above average rents, it’s a pretty good bet that average rents will be rising in the future! This kind of phenomenon may be under exploited in formal inflation forecasting.
And, on the continuing speculation whether inflation will go away with interest rates still substantially below current inflation, the graph does seem a leading indicator that the rational expectations model is winning.”
From the Grumpy Economist:
“This beautiful graph comes from calculatedriskblog.com. (Courtesy Andy Atkeson who used it in a nice discussion of a great paper by Ivan Werning at the Minneapolis Fed Foundations of Monetary Policy conference.)
The central lines that don’t move so much are the average rent. This is the quantity used by the Bureau of Labor Statistics to compute the consumer price index.
Posted by 8:56 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Subscribe to: Posts