Showing posts with label Global Housing Watch. Show all posts
Tuesday, January 15, 2019
From EconoSpeak:
“In the world of urban politics, there is probably no more potent populist rallying cry than the demand to halt gentrification. Activists have fought it on multiple fronts: zoning, development subsidies, permitting, rent control—every lever housing policies afford. But what if they’re mistaking cause for effect, hacking away at the visible manifestations of the problem while leaving the problem itself intact?
Pivot to an important article in today’s New York Times, reporting on recent research David Autor of MIT presented at the economics meetings in Atlanta earlier this month. It’s all summed up in this set of charts:
As you can see from the tiny print at the top, the data are being read horizontally within each chart, from less dense regions (rural areas) on the left to high density cities on the right. The question being asked in the article is, if you live in a rural area or a small town, how much benefit can you get from moving to a big city? In the early post-WWII period, the answer was “a lot” for both the majority holding only a high school diploma and the few with a college BA. By 2015 the situation had changed: it was still a good move for college grads but there was little to be gained by those with only a high school education—and probably even less when you factor in the increased cost of living. That’s an interesting story.
But there’s another way to read these charts, vertically, comparing wage gaps at any particular time and place between these two education-defined groups. In 1950 the gap was relatively small; in the densest cities the college crowd made about 30% more per hour than the high schoolers. By 2015 they made almost twice as much. And don’t forget that the rise of inequality is virtually fractal: similar gaps have opened up within the top 20%, and within the top 5%, 1% and .01%. The whole rightward tail of the distribution has elongated, pulling ever further from the median.”
Continue reading here.
From EconoSpeak:
“In the world of urban politics, there is probably no more potent populist rallying cry than the demand to halt gentrification. Activists have fought it on multiple fronts: zoning, development subsidies, permitting, rent control—every lever housing policies afford. But what if they’re mistaking cause for effect, hacking away at the visible manifestations of the problem while leaving the problem itself intact?
Pivot to an important article in today’s New York Times,
Posted by 10:46 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch, Inclusive Growth
Friday, January 11, 2019
On the US:
On other countries:
Photo by Aliis Sinisalu
On the US:
Posted by 5:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Thursday, January 3, 2019
Below is a preliminary list of papers that will presented at this year’s AEA Annual Meeting on January 4-6 in Atlanta, Georgia.
On housing and cycles
On housing and mortgage
On housing policy
On housing supply
On housing affordability
On housing and evictions
On housing, investors, and speculation
On housing and the sharing economy
On housing, the environment, and natural disasters
On housing and transportation
On housing and everything else
*AEA indicates that neither the paper or presentation is available at the moment.
**This post has been updated on January 5 to add missing papers, and to add links to presentations and papers to existing papers.
Below is a preliminary list of papers that will presented at this year’s AEA Annual Meeting on January 4-6 in Atlanta, Georgia.
On housing and cycles
Posted by 10:42 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, December 28, 2018
The IMF’s latest report on Bolivia says:
“Credit quotas should be relaxed to limit poor-quality credit growth. Interest caps should also be removed so that lending decisions better reflect intrinsic risks. This would remove distortions in the allocation of credit and support desirable allocation of resources in support of growth. ASFI is urged to monitor closely capital quality for its ability to absorb potential shocks and to scrutinize possible risks arising from rapid credit growth to housing. In this context, the Fund welcomes the opportunity to assist the authorities to prepare a real estate price index and urges rapid progress.”
The IMF’s latest report on Bolivia says:
“Credit quotas should be relaxed to limit poor-quality credit growth. Interest caps should also be removed so that lending decisions better reflect intrinsic risks. This would remove distortions in the allocation of credit and support desirable allocation of resources in support of growth. ASFI is urged to monitor closely capital quality for its ability to absorb potential shocks and to scrutinize possible risks arising from rapid credit growth to housing.
Posted by 10:15 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, December 21, 2018
On cross-country:
On the US:
On other countries:
Photo by Aliis Sinisalu
On cross-country:
On the US:
Posted by 5:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Subscribe to: Posts