Saturday, November 8, 2025
From a paper by Michał Brzozowski and Joanna Siwińska-Gorzelak:
“This article examines the impact of robotization on the short-term correlation between employment and output. We estimate the Okun’s Law relationship utilizing panel data from 35 OECD countries for the period from 1996 to 2020. Our empirical evidence, backed up by a battery of robustness tests, consistently shows that automation contributes to job-preserving recessions by mitigating increases in unemployment during economic contractions. This challenges common assumptions regarding the detrimental impact of automation on employment. Additionally, we do not find support for the notion that automation causes jobless recoveries.”
From a paper by Michał Brzozowski and Joanna Siwińska-Gorzelak:
“This article examines the impact of robotization on the short-term correlation between employment and output. We estimate the Okun’s Law relationship utilizing panel data from 35 OECD countries for the period from 1996 to 2020. Our empirical evidence, backed up by a battery of robustness tests, consistently shows that automation contributes to job-preserving recessions by mitigating increases in unemployment during economic contractions.
Posted by at 6:35 AM
Labels: Inclusive Growth
On cross-country:
Working papers and conferences:
On Australia and New Zealand:
On other countries:
On cross-country:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, November 7, 2025
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
On sales, permits, starts, and supply:
On other developments:
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, October 31, 2025
From a paper by Karen Dynan and Douglas Elmendorf:
“This paper simulates economic developments as if the discretionary fiscal stimulus enacted in the
past two recessions had not occurred and additional automatic fiscal stabilizers had been deployed
instead. For the calibration of key economic relationships most consistent with the empirical
literature, we find that more sustained fiscal stimulus would have pushed unemployment down
more rapidly following the Great Recession and that more limited stimulus would have caused
inflation to increase much less following the COVID recession. We caution, though, that our
estimates are uncertain given the large number of assumptions embedded in the calculations. Under
different assumptions about the supply side of the economy when resource utilization is high, the
stimulus enacted in early 2021 was not a significant cause of the observed runup in inflation that
followed, and substituting an automatic stabilizer would have made little difference to inflation.”
From a paper by Karen Dynan and Douglas Elmendorf:
“This paper simulates economic developments as if the discretionary fiscal stimulus enacted in the
past two recessions had not occurred and additional automatic fiscal stabilizers had been deployed
instead. For the calibration of key economic relationships most consistent with the empirical
literature, we find that more sustained fiscal stimulus would have pushed unemployment down
more rapidly following the Great Recession and that more limited stimulus would have caused
inflation to increase much less following the COVID recession.
Posted by at 9:32 PM
Labels: Inclusive Growth
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
On sales, permits, starts, and supply:
On other developments:
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Subscribe to: Posts