Showing posts with label Global Housing Watch. Show all posts
Friday, January 17, 2025
On cross-country:
Working papers and conferences:
On the US—developments on house prices, rent, permits and mortgage:
On the US—other developments:
On Australia and New Zealand:
On other countries:
On cross-country:
Working papers and conferences:
On the US—developments on house prices,
Posted by 5:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Monday, January 13, 2025
From a paper by Edward L. Glaeser, Leonardo D’Amico, Joseph Gyourko, William Kerr, and Giacomo A.M. Ponzetto:
“We document a Kuznets curve for construction productivity in 20th-century America. Homes built per construction worker remained stagnant between 1900 and 1940, boomed after World War II, and then plummeted after 1970. The productivity boom from 1940 to 1970 shows that nothing makes technological progress inherently impossible in construction. What stopped it? We present a model in which local land-use controls limit the size of building projects. This constraint reduces the equilibrium size of construction companies, reducing both scale economies and incentives to invest in innovation. Our model shows that, in a competitive industry, such inefficient reductions in firm size and technology investment are a distinctive consequence of restrictive project regulation, while classic regulatory barriers to entry increase firm size. The model is consistent with an extensive series of key facts about the nature of the construction sector. The post-1970 productivity decline coincides with increases in our best proxies for land-use regulation. The size of development projects is small today and has declined over time. The size of construction firms is also quite small, especially relative to other goods-producing firms, and smaller builders are less productive. Areas with stricter land use regulation have particularly small and unproductive construction establishments. Patenting activity in construction stagnated and diverged from other sectors. A back-of-the-envelope calculation indicates that, if half of the observed link between establishment size and productivity is causal, America’s residential construction firms would be approximately 60 percent more productive if their size distribution matched that of manufacturing.”
From a paper by Edward L. Glaeser, Leonardo D’Amico, Joseph Gyourko, William Kerr, and Giacomo A.M. Ponzetto:
“We document a Kuznets curve for construction productivity in 20th-century America. Homes built per construction worker remained stagnant between 1900 and 1940, boomed after World War II, and then plummeted after 1970. The productivity boom from 1940 to 1970 shows that nothing makes technological progress inherently impossible in construction. What stopped it? We present a model in which local land-use controls limit the size of building projects.
Posted by 8:09 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, January 10, 2025
Working papers and conferences:
On the US—developments on house prices, rent, permits and mortgage:
On the US—other developments:
On Australia and New Zealand:
On other countries:
Working papers and conferences:
Posted by 5:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Sunday, January 5, 2025
From a paper by Prince Mensah Osei, Johnny Lo, Ute Mueller, Steven Richardson, and Ebenezer Afrifa-Yamoah:
“Time-frequency domain analysis of housing prices can provide insights into significant periodic patterns in the pricing dynamics for modelling and forecasting purposes. This study applied wavelet and information entropy analyses to examine the periodic patterns and evolution of housing prices in Australia’s eight capital cities from 1980 to 2023, using quarterly median house pricing data. Our findings revealed consistent patterns of higher variability in housing prices at high frequencies across all cities, with Melbourne exhibiting the highest variability. This indicates that short-term price fluctuations were higher than long-term changes. Perth and Brisbane demonstrated notable cyclical patterns with recurring periods of growth and decline. Coherence analyses revealed dynamic lead–lag relationships, both positive and negative, between housing prices of various cities, suggesting interconnectedness but not always synchronisation. Some cities’ housing prices dominated the information sharing, indicating varying degrees of influence within the national market. These findings highlight the complex, dynamic interdependencies among Australia’s major city housing markets, providing valuable insights for policymakers, investors, and stakeholders in economic forecasting, policy development and strategic planning within these markets.”
From a paper by Prince Mensah Osei, Johnny Lo, Ute Mueller, Steven Richardson, and Ebenezer Afrifa-Yamoah:
“Time-frequency domain analysis of housing prices can provide insights into significant periodic patterns in the pricing dynamics for modelling and forecasting purposes. This study applied wavelet and information entropy analyses to examine the periodic patterns and evolution of housing prices in Australia’s eight capital cities from 1980 to 2023,
Posted by 1:28 PM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, January 3, 2025
From a paper by Rasmus Bisgaard Larsen, Søren Hove Ravn, and Emiliano Santoro:
“We present aggregate and regional evidence showing that U.S. house prices increase persistently in response to positive shocks to fiscal spending. In sharp contrast to this, house prices decline in conventional dynamic general equilibrium models, where shocks that have short-lived effects on the shadow value of housing inevitably generate negative comovement between households’ marginal utility of consumption and house prices (see Barsky et al., 2007). In response to an increase in government spending, the negative wealth effect exerted by the simultaneous increase in the present-value tax burden increases the marginal utility of consumption. Even overcoming the consumption crowding-out puzzle is not sufficient to resolve this shortcoming. To tackle this problem, we extend an otherwise standard model embedding a lender-borrower relationship with alternative—yet, potentially complementary—propagation channels that leverage the expansion in total factor productivity stemming from a positive shock to fiscal spending, so as to contrast the negative wealth effect of higher taxes. This class of models succeeds in generating a persistent expansion in house prices, although the propagation required to match the data is stronger—in some cases significantly so—than what is typically found in the literature. The positive interplay between house prices and productivity finds support in both aggregate and regional data.”
From a paper by Rasmus Bisgaard Larsen, Søren Hove Ravn, and Emiliano Santoro:
“We present aggregate and regional evidence showing that U.S. house prices increase persistently in response to positive shocks to fiscal spending. In sharp contrast to this, house prices decline in conventional dynamic general equilibrium models, where shocks that have short-lived effects on the shadow value of housing inevitably generate negative comovement between households’ marginal utility of consumption and house prices (see Barsky et al.,
Posted by 8:04 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Subscribe to: Posts