Tuesday, January 9, 2018
A new IMF report says that: “By 2100, climate change could impact more than 12 percent of the Vietnamese population and reduce growth by 10 percent. The Vietnamese government considers the response to climate change a vital issue and has implemented environmental policies to better cope with these risks.”

“But the country—which has relied heavily on fossil fuels and overexploitation of natural resources—needs to further adapt its economy toward a more sustainable and ecofriendly growth model.”
“Policies that can better prepare Vietnam for the future impact of climate change should focus on:
A new IMF report says that: “By 2100, climate change could impact more than 12 percent of the Vietnamese population and reduce growth by 10 percent. The Vietnamese government considers the response to climate change a vital issue and has implemented environmental policies to better cope with these risks.”

“But the country—which has relied heavily on fossil fuels and overexploitation of natural resources—needs to further adapt its economy toward a more sustainable and ecofriendly growth model.”
Posted by at 9:01 PM
Labels: Energy & Climate Change
Saturday, January 6, 2018
From a new IMF working paper by Jonathan Ostry, Andrew Berg, and Siddharth Kothari:
“Do structural reforms that aim to boost potential output also change the distribution of income? We shed light on this question by looking at the broad patterns in the cross-country data covering advanced, emerging-market, and low-income countries. Our main finding is that there is indeed evidence of a growth-equity tradeoff for some important reforms. Financial and capital account liberalization seem to increase both growth and inequality, as do some measures of liberalization of current account transactions. Reforms aimed at strengthening the impartiality of and adherence to the legal system seem to entail no growth-equity tradeoff—such reforms are good for growth and do not worsen inequality. The results for our index of network reforms as well as our measure of the decentralization of collective labor bargaining are the weakest and least robust, potentially due to data limitations. We also ask: If some structural reforms worsen inequality, to what degree does this offset the growth gains from the reforms themselves? While higher inequality does dampen the growth benefits, the net effect on growth remains positive for most reform indicators.”
From a new IMF working paper by Jonathan Ostry, Andrew Berg, and Siddharth Kothari:
“Do structural reforms that aim to boost potential output also change the distribution of income? We shed light on this question by looking at the broad patterns in the cross-country data covering advanced, emerging-market, and low-income countries. Our main finding is that there is indeed evidence of a growth-equity tradeoff for some important reforms. Financial and capital account liberalization seem to increase both growth and inequality,
Posted by at 8:28 AM
Labels: Inclusive Growth
Friday, January 5, 2018
On international house pricing:
On household finance:
On mortgages:
On behavioral real estate:
On affordable housing:
On property taxes:
On agency and bargaining:
On homeownership:
Photo by Aliis Sinisalu
On international house pricing:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Thursday, January 4, 2018
A new paper concludes that “Okun’s law is applicable in Russia.” “The economic connection between economic growth rates and changes in unemployment proposed by Okun (1962) over half a century ago remains one of the main tools for analyzing labor markets.”
“Gabrisch and Buscher (2006) proposed that the formation of the labor market mechanism in the formerly planned economies could be considered as completed once Okun’s law became persistently applicable there.”
“The general conclusion is that Okun’s law is applicable in Russia both in the short and long run. A comparison (Akhundova et al., 2005) has shown that transition processes in the Russian labor market were completed during the first half of the 2000s (i.e., the shaping of the labor market mechanisms took slightly more than 10 years).”
The article is available from the Russian Journal of Economics.
A new paper concludes that “Okun’s law is applicable in Russia.” “The economic connection between economic growth rates and changes in unemployment proposed by Okun (1962) over half a century ago remains one of the main tools for analyzing labor markets.”
“Gabrisch and Buscher (2006) proposed that the formation of the labor market mechanism in the formerly planned economies could be considered as completed once Okun’s law became persistently applicable there.”
“The general conclusion is that Okun’s law is applicable in Russia both in the short and long run.
Posted by at 10:42 AM
Labels: Inclusive Growth
In a new paper, Daniel Aromi shows that “excessive optimism after the arrival of positive information” for a few years about a country’s prospects can lead to large forecast errors when the information turns negative but forecasts don’t.
“[…] some years before the Asian crisis, Krugman (1994) warned against ‘popular enthusiasm about Asia’s boom’. More recently, Pritchett and Summers (2014) indicate that growth expectations regarding the Chinese and Indian economies might suffer from excessive extrapolation of recent trajectories. In addition to these warnings, further motivation is provided by macroeconomic episodes in which improved economic prospects are followed by crises. For instance, several European economies, among them Greece and Ireland, went through this type of trajectory. Another case is given by recent events in Brazil, where prominent optimism regarding economic prospects was later proven wrong in a stark manner.”
“The empirical analysis shows a significant association between mean forecast errors and earlier information flows. The sign of the documented relationship is consistent with the overreaction hypothesis. More positive information is followed, on average, by higher forecast errors, that is, by increments in the mean difference between forecast growth and realized growth.”
“It is worth noting that the strongest evidence is documented for information flows and forecasts errors that are between 4 and 8 years apart. In other words, the evidence indicates the presence of a process that develops at a frequency that is lower than the usual business cycle frequency.”
“This work documents the presence of systematic errors in growth forecasts. Mean forecast errors are positively associated with the tone of information flows observed in previous periods.”
“The inefficient use of information and the associated errors in decision-making could explain economically significant aggregate fluctuations. In particular, excessive optimism after the arrival of positive information can contribute to the emergence of vulnerabilities that increase the likelihood of economic crises.”
The article is available from the International Finance.
In a new paper, Daniel Aromi shows that “excessive optimism after the arrival of positive information” for a few years about a country’s prospects can lead to large forecast errors when the information turns negative but forecasts don’t.
“[…] some years before the Asian crisis, Krugman (1994) warned against ‘popular enthusiasm about Asia’s boom’. More recently, Pritchett and Summers (2014) indicate that growth expectations regarding the Chinese and Indian economies might suffer from excessive extrapolation of recent trajectories.
Posted by at 10:41 AM
Labels: Forecasting Forum
Subscribe to: Posts