Tuesday, April 22, 2025
From a paper by Danijela Lazović Vuković, and Jože P. Damijan:
“This paper studies the drivers of rising income inequality in OECD countries between 1980 and 2018. By testing Milanovic’s TOP hypothesis in our sample, we measure the extent to which these distributional outcomes have been driven by either technological progress or globalization and the extent to which they have been influenced or mitigated by policy choices. The results of our empirical analysis provide the basis for confirming the TOP hypothesis. We find evidence that a 10 percent increase in trade openness, financial globalization, and technological progress is on average associated with a 0.4 percent, 0.3 percent, and 0.9 percent change in market inequality, respectively. At the same time, policies such as public expenditure on education, employment protection legislation and direct income taxes promote a more equal distribution. Our most notable finding, however, is that policies not only have a direct equalizing effect, but also mitigate the effects of globalization and technological progress on income inequality. The results of our study suggest that there are reasonable alternatives to anti-globalization strategies and that redistributive and labor market policies can be tailored to control inequality in the era of globalization and technology.”
From a paper by Danijela Lazović Vuković, and Jože P. Damijan:
“This paper studies the drivers of rising income inequality in OECD countries between 1980 and 2018. By testing Milanovic’s TOP hypothesis in our sample, we measure the extent to which these distributional outcomes have been driven by either technological progress or globalization and the extent to which they have been influenced or mitigated by policy choices. The results of our empirical analysis provide the basis for confirming the TOP hypothesis.
Posted by 4:19 PM
atLabels: Inclusive Growth
Saturday, April 19, 2025
On cross-country:
Working papers and conferences:
On Australia and New Zealand:
On other countries:
On cross-country:
Working papers and conferences:
Posted by 5:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, April 18, 2025
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
On sales, permits, starts, and supply:
On impact of tariffs on housing:
On other developments:
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
Posted by 5:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Wednesday, April 16, 2025
From a paper by Du Zhang and Rundong Chen:
“This article analyzes the impact of global economic uncertainty (GEU) and country-specific economic uncertainty (CSEU) on cross-border capital flows using quarterly data from 31 countries between 1997 and 2022, employing a DFM-SV model. The findings reveal that rising GEU leads to capital inflows, while increasing CSEU results in capital outflows. Macroeconomic variables such as CPI and interest rate spread can moderate the effects of GEU and CSEU on capital flows. Additionally, the equity index mitigates capital outflows driven by higher CSEU. In emerging markets, capital flows are particularly sensitive to macroeconomic factors. The influence of GEU on capital flows is moderated by government spending, stock indices, and the real effective exchange rate (REER). Government spending, import volumes, and stock market volatility exacerbate CSEU-induced capital outflows, while the REER dampens them. These insights deepen our understanding of economic uncertainty’s role in cross-border capital movements, offering valuable implications for market regulators, firms, and investors.”
From a paper by Du Zhang and Rundong Chen:
“This article analyzes the impact of global economic uncertainty (GEU) and country-specific economic uncertainty (CSEU) on cross-border capital flows using quarterly data from 31 countries between 1997 and 2022, employing a DFM-SV model. The findings reveal that rising GEU leads to capital inflows, while increasing CSEU results in capital outflows. Macroeconomic variables such as CPI and interest rate spread can moderate the effects of GEU and CSEU on capital flows.
Posted by 1:31 PM
atLabels: Inclusive Growth
Tuesday, April 15, 2025
From a paper by Luis I. Jácome, Nicolás E. Magud, Samuel Pienknagura, and Martin Uribe:
“As inflation targeting (IT) turns 35, it has become a key institutional monetary framework by central banks. Yet, this paper shows that stark differences exist among inflation targeting countries in the conduct of monetary policy. Behind such heterogeneity, the legacy of a high inflation history appears as a preponderant factor. We propose a model that diverges from existing IT workhorse models by adding path-dependence (to a forward-looking model) and potentially imperfect central bank credibility. We show that achieving low inflation (hitting the target) requires more aggressive monetary policy, and is costlier from an output point of view, when individuals’ past inflationary experiences shape their inflation expectation formation. In turn, we provide empirical evidence of the need for these two theoretical additions. Countries that experienced a high level of inflation before adopting the IT regime tend to respond more aggressively to deviations of inflation expectations from the central bank’s target. We also point to the existence of a credibility puzzle, whereby the strength of a central bank’s monetary policy response to deviations from the inflation target remains broadly unchanged even as central banks gain credibility over time. Put differently, a country’s inflationary past casts a long and persistent shadow on central banks.”
From a paper by Luis I. Jácome, Nicolás E. Magud, Samuel Pienknagura, and Martin Uribe:
“As inflation targeting (IT) turns 35, it has become a key institutional monetary framework by central banks. Yet, this paper shows that stark differences exist among inflation targeting countries in the conduct of monetary policy. Behind such heterogeneity, the legacy of a high inflation history appears as a preponderant factor. We propose a model that diverges from existing IT workhorse models by adding path-dependence (to a forward-looking model) and potentially imperfect central bank credibility.
Posted by 9:51 AM
atLabels: Inclusive Growth
Subscribe to: Posts