Showing posts with label Global Housing Watch. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 12, 2019
From the IMF’s latest report on Belgium:
“Private sector indebtedness, primarily associated with household debt, and sustained increases in housing prices pose additional challenges. Strong growth in mortgage lending (9 percent in 2018) has contributed to a sizeable increase in household debt and housing prices. Models, however, point to only a modest house price overvaluation, depending on location. Meanwhile, the share of loans with a loan-to-value (LTV) ratio below 80 percent has declined by about 10 percentage points during 2014–2017. Although default rates are currently low, households have substantial assets in the aggregate, and household debt-to income is in line with peers, a sharp housing (and asset) price correction could result in rising defaults for some groups of the population and affect banks’ solvency, with second round effects on investment, consumption, and growth. 12 Belgian unconsolidated corporate debt has also increased over the last few years to a relatively high level, although, the level is more in line with peers after accounting for intragroup loans. Nonetheless, its dynamics warrant close monitoring, given recent strong bank credit growth to the corporate sector (…).
Staff welcomed the authorities’ recent macroprudential measures to address risks in the housing market and encouraged the authorities to remain proactive. To guard against a correction in housing prices and discourage banks from taking excessive credit risk, the National Bank of Belgium (NBB) introduced in May 2018 an add-on to risk weights on bank mortgage exposures as a new macroprudential measure. In view of the robust overall level of credit growth (5.9 percent in 2018) and credit gap (the NBB estimates this at 2 percent at end Q3-2018), staff recommended that the NBB continue to closely monitor the build-up of cyclical risks in both the household and corporate sectors and stand ready to tighten macroprudential policy further, including through the use of a countercyclical capital buffer. The authorities could also consider revising the framework for macroprudential decision-making to ensure the ability to deploy a broader range of macroprudential policies in a timely manner, as recommended by the 2017 Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) mission.”
From the IMF’s latest report on Belgium:
“Private sector indebtedness, primarily associated with household debt, and sustained increases in housing prices pose additional challenges. Strong growth in mortgage lending (9 percent in 2018) has contributed to a sizeable increase in household debt and housing prices. Models, however, point to only a modest house price overvaluation, depending on location. Meanwhile, the share of loans with a loan-to-value (LTV) ratio below 80 percent has declined by about 10 percentage points during 2014–2017.
Posted by 9:26 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
From the IMF’s latest report on Malaysia:
“The authorities continue to closely monitor risks emanating from the housing market, although the risks are deemed manageable (…). House price growth has declined from 6.5 percent in 2017 to 3 percent in 2018H1, and the volume of transactions has also declined. The number of unsold housing units that have been completed or are currently under construction is increasing and is mostly concentrated in high-rise buildings. Banks’ direct exposure to developers remain small and is closely monitored by the BNM. According to BNM stress tests, potential bank losses originating from a possible sharp real estate price adjustment and shocks to income and interest rates are small relative to the banks’ capital buffers. The BNM, MOF, and Ministry of Housing and Local Government have introduced new measures that help reduce the cost of property or of contracting a mortgage loan, with the objective to strengthen the demand for housing and facilitate leasing, and therefore gradually reduce the supply overhang. The impact of these measures should be evaluated on an ongoing basis to ensure effectiveness and correct potential distortions.
As systemic risks from the housing market dissipate, the residency-based differentiation in the real estate measures introduced in 2014 should be gradually phased out. Given banks’ sizable exposure to mortgage lending and to the construction industry, a real estate market price correction, through a reduction in household and corporate wealth, and these agents’ debt servicing capacity, could have a significant impact on growth and financial stability as NPLs rise. During 2012–13, the Malaysian House Price Index (MHPI) grew by a cumulative 24 percent, well-above its long-run annual average of 6 percent and, in 2014, amid further significant price increases, the number of transactions by non-citizens surged by 30 percent (…). The measures introduced in 2014 helped cool down the market (cutting growth in property purchases by non-citizens by over 50 percent in 2015 and by another 38.9 percent in 2016, and slowing the growth rate of MHPI to 9.4 and 7.4 percent in 2014 and 2015, respectively), avoid significant price adjustments, and reduce the rate of future debt build-up, thus reducing the probability of systemic distress. In the absence of a capital inflow surge for the time-being, but still high household leverage, gradually removing the residency-based differentiation in both measures is recommended as systemic risk dissipates. Carefully calibrated changes to the measures could have the additional benefits of helping to reduce the excess supply of high-end housing where nonresident buyers are concentrated and thereby the probability of a sharp downward price correction. Should the activity in certain segments again threaten financial stability, the authorities may consider macroprudential measures that target the specific segments, without a differentiated treatment of non-residents.”
From the IMF’s latest report on Malaysia:
“The authorities continue to closely monitor risks emanating from the housing market, although the risks are deemed manageable (…). House price growth has declined from 6.5 percent in 2017 to 3 percent in 2018H1, and the volume of transactions has also declined. The number of unsold housing units that have been completed or are currently under construction is increasing and is mostly concentrated in high-rise buildings.
Posted by 9:20 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, March 8, 2019
On the US:
On other countries:
On the US:
Posted by 5:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, March 1, 2019
From the IMF’s latest report on Malta:
“Rapidly rising house prices and rents may eventually pose financial stability risks while putting some vulnerable households at risk of poverty. Policies that help mitigate the rapid increase of house prices and make rents more affordable while strengthening households and banks’ balance sheets should be encouraged.
Strong demand for housing has continued to push up property prices. While some signs of overvaluation have started to emerge, recent house price trends can largely be explained by fundamentals such as e.g., strong immigration flows, rising disposable income, portfolio rebalancing towards property investment and a delayed supply response. Other factors such as the extension of the first-time home-buyer stamp duty relief, the reduced tax rate on rental income, surging demand for tourist accommodation and, for the high-end segment, the IIP may also have played a role (but are not directly controlled for in the empirical analysis conducted in Annex I).
Banks’ exposure to housing-market-related risks is high and increasing, and the introduction of macroprudential measures should proceed as planned. All the more so that households’ indebtedness is relatively high, low income households are vulnerable to housing price corrections and flexible interest rate on mortgages are prevalent.7 Against this backdrop, recent efforts to close data gaps (loan-level data collection) and the planned introduction of borrowerbased macroprudential measures such as caps to loan-to-value (LTV) ratios at origin, stressed debt service-to-income (DSTI) limits, and amortization requirements are steps in the right direction (see text table).
To be more effective, the new borrower-based measures could be refined in due course and exemptions to the LTV limit could be narrowed. To avoid excessive risk concentration, speed limits should be defined in terms of the total value of new loans, not in terms of the number of new loans, and speed limits for loans against secondary and buy-to-let properties, the likely most speculative segment, should be lowered as soon as concerns about any initial disruptions dissipate. Finally, the scope of the new borrower-based measures should be extended to also cover non-bank mortgage loans.
Rapidly rising housing costs are affecting vulnerable households. The government recently relaxed the eligibility requirements for rent subsidies, but the scheme should be periodically reviewed to ensure it remains targeted on low-income households. Further efforts should also be envisaged to accelerate the provision of social housing, including by fiscally incentivizing private investments.
Authorities’ Views
Rapidly rising property prices are viewed by the authorities as mainly reflecting economic fundamentals. Inflows of foreign labor and higher income in general are fueling housing demand. The authorities also see the impact of tax benefits for first and second-time home buyers, the reduced tax rate on rental income and the IIP as marginal. They stressed that the planned borrower-based macroprudential measures were carefully calibrated to have minimal market impact upon their introduction. The authorities have agreed that there is room for refinement, in due course, and emphasized that they can easily recalibrate the measures to mitigate financial stability risks emanating from the housing market in a timely and effective manner. The authorities also recognize the growing importance of making housing more affordable for vulnerable households. They emphasized the progressive nature of the new rent subsidy scheme. Projects are underway to increase the stock of social and affordable housing.”
From the IMF’s latest report on Malta:
“Rapidly rising house prices and rents may eventually pose financial stability risks while putting some vulnerable households at risk of poverty. Policies that help mitigate the rapid increase of house prices and make rents more affordable while strengthening households and banks’ balance sheets should be encouraged.
Strong demand for housing has continued to push up property prices. While some signs of overvaluation have started to emerge,
Posted by 10:52 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
On cross-country:
On the US:
On other countries:
On cross-country:
Posted by 5:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Subscribe to: Posts