Sunday, February 22, 2026
From a paper by Shih-Yen Pan , Lawrence P. King & Elias Nosrati:
“The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has been one of the world’s most powerful international
organisations in setting the parameters for economic reforms in the developing world. In this study,
using annual cross-national data from 1980–2019, we investigate the impact of the IMF’s lending programmes on poverty incidence in participant countries. Departing from the prevailing practice of relying on instrumental variables, we employ a novel difference-in-differences approach that ensures clean comparisons between ‘treatment’ and ‘control’ units based on their programme participation histories. Besides providing a quantitative estimate of the average programme effect, we evaluate whether the IMF’s alleged anti-poverty focus in recent decades has made any difference. We find that IMF programme participation leads to large increases (4.2-5 percent of the total population) in the proportion of a country’s population living under the $6.85=day international poverty line (2017 PPP) and the country-specific Societal Poverty Line. We also find that the poverty reduction measures incorporated by the IMF into its programmes have not been effective in mitigating the poverty-increasing programme effects. Overall, our findings suggest that IMF programmes have been detrimental to the welfare of vulnerable populations in participant countries.”
From a paper by Shih-Yen Pan , Lawrence P. King & Elias Nosrati:
“The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has been one of the world’s most powerful international
organisations in setting the parameters for economic reforms in the developing world. In this study,
using annual cross-national data from 1980–2019, we investigate the impact of the IMF’s lending programmes on poverty incidence in participant countries. Departing from the prevailing practice of relying on instrumental variables,
Posted by at 7:26 PM
Labels: Inclusive Growth
Saturday, February 21, 2026
On cross-country:
Working papers and conferences:
On China:
On Australia and New Zealand:
On other countries:
On cross-country:
Working papers and conferences:
On China:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, February 20, 2026
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
On sales, permits, starts, and supply:
On other developments:
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Monday, February 16, 2026
From a paper by Li Xie, and Zhisheng Huang:
“We incorporate the characteristics of energy price management systems in developed countries and China into a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model (DSGE) respectively, examine the differences in the impact of international energy price shocks on the countries’ inflation under the two types of energy price management systems, and then analyze the role of developed countries’ energy price management system (DC-EPMS) and China’s energy price management system (CN-EPMS) in the process of international energy price shocks affecting inflation. The results indicate that CN-EPMS is more effective in mitigating the negative impact of international energy price shocks on inflation compared to DC-EPMS in developed countries. Under the DC-EPMS, non-state-owned enterprises in a dominant position in the energy market, faced with international energy price shocks, will be driven by profit-maximizing behaviors to transfer the fluctuations in international energy prices to domestic energy prices and their expectations, thereby triggering inflation in developed countries; under the CN-EPMS, state-owned energy enterprises as policy implementation tools, faced with international energy price shocks, have played a functional role in safeguarding energy supply and maintaining energy price stability through energy price control and policy-oriented financial support, thereby stabilizing the energy price expectations of domestic energy consumers and effectively blocking the transmission of international energy price shocks to the inflation.”
From a paper by Li Xie, and Zhisheng Huang:
“We incorporate the characteristics of energy price management systems in developed countries and China into a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model (DSGE) respectively, examine the differences in the impact of international energy price shocks on the countries’ inflation under the two types of energy price management systems, and then analyze the role of developed countries’ energy price management system (DC-EPMS) and China’s energy price management system (CN-EPMS) in the process of international energy price shocks affecting inflation.
Posted by at 11:12 AM
Labels: Energy & Climate Change
From a paper by Kardelen Cicek, Julieth Pico Mejía, Marcos Poplawski-Ribeiro, Alberto Tumino:
“This paper analyzes the redistributive effects of inflation across 18 European economies from
2021:Q3 to 2022:Q2, using unique micro-datasets for this country sample. We estimate inflation’s impact on household welfare through the consumption basket, income, and wealth channels. Our main contribution is incorporating real assets into the wealth channel and accounting for behavioral responses to inflation in both the income and wealth channels. These factors significantly alter inflation’s distributional effects compared to previous literature. The inflation shock is estimated to have caused an average welfare loss equivalent to 18.5 percent of annual household income across our sample, with households in the poorest income quintiles suffering the largest losses. Cross-country differences also widen when real assets are incorporated, with a few economies even showing welfare gains for some or all quintiles because house prices rose faster than inflation.”
From a paper by Kardelen Cicek, Julieth Pico Mejía, Marcos Poplawski-Ribeiro, Alberto Tumino:
“This paper analyzes the redistributive effects of inflation across 18 European economies from
2021:Q3 to 2022:Q2, using unique micro-datasets for this country sample. We estimate inflation’s impact on household welfare through the consumption basket, income, and wealth channels. Our main contribution is incorporating real assets into the wealth channel and accounting for behavioral responses to inflation in both the income and wealth channels.
Posted by at 11:11 AM
Labels: Inclusive Growth
Subscribe to: Posts