Friday, December 30, 2022
On the US—developments on house prices, rent, permits and mortgage:
On the US—other developments:
On other countries:
On the US—developments on house prices, rent, permits and mortgage:
Posted by 6:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Tuesday, December 27, 2022
From Noah Smith:
“With the return of the border crisis and Biden’s plans for a big new immigration reform, it looks like the immigration issue is heating up again. In the coming year we’re probably going to hear lots of very heated arguments from a lot of different angles, and I’m inevitably going to be blogging about some of these. But one aspect of the immigration debate that I feel like I’ve already dealt with pretty well is the question of wages.
A lot of people think immigration lowers wages for native-born Americans. This is true of both immigration opponents, but also of some supporters, who think an influx of workers will help restrain inflation. This is a natural thing to think, since everyone knows that immigration increases labor supply. But what fewer people realize is that immigration also raises labor demand, which tends to cancel out the downward pressure on wages. In late 2020 I wrote a post called “Why immigration doesn’t reduce wages”, in which I explained how this works and listed a bunch of the relevant evidence. I wanted it to be a useful and comprehensive guide that people could come back to again and again.
In this post, I’m going to explain why immigration doesn’t lower wages for native-born people (except possibly a little bit, in a few special circumstances). But before I do that, there’s one thing you really have to understand: No one is going to be persuaded by this post. There are two reasons for this.
First, people don’t really believe social science evidence. It took years and years of empirical research — solid results, almost all pointing in the same direction — just to shift academic economists’ opinions on the effects of minimum wage. The average person, not being an academic economist, has even less of an idea of how reliable social science research is.
Second, in my experience, anti-immigration people are completely set in their belief that immigration should be restricted. It’s their fixed north star. The justifications change — Lower wages! Environmental destruction! Brain drain! Rule of law! Cultural change! — but the policy conclusion never wavers. They know what they want to do.
So this post isn’t going to persuade anti-immigration people to change their stance, and it’s probably not going to persuade many normies to be up in arms about the need to let in more immigrants, either. But it’s still important to write, and not just because I’m a stubborn S.O.B. who will die face-down in the muck fighting for The Empirical Evidence. It’s because in another 20 years or so, when America’s current freakout over identity and nationhood has passed, we’re hopefully going to be ready to let in a bunch of immigrants again. And when that time finally comes, these arguments will matter.”
Continue reading here.
From Noah Smith:
“With the return of the border crisis and Biden’s plans for a big new immigration reform, it looks like the immigration issue is heating up again. In the coming year we’re probably going to hear lots of very heated arguments from a lot of different angles, and I’m inevitably going to be blogging about some of these. But one aspect of the immigration debate that I feel like I’ve already dealt with pretty well is the question of wages.
Posted by 5:15 PM
atLabels: Macro Demystified
Friday, December 23, 2022
On cross-country:
On the US—developments on house prices, rent, permits and mortgage:
On the US—other developments:
On China:
On other countries:
On cross-country:
On the US—developments on house prices, rent, permits and mortgage:
Posted by 5:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Wednesday, December 21, 2022
From a new paper by Heidi Artigue, Jeffrey Brinkman, and Svyatoslav Karnasevych:
“As house prices continue to rise in large, supply-constrained cities, what are the implications for other places that have room to grow? Recent literature suggests that amenities that improve quality of life are becoming increasingly important in location decisions. In this paper, we explore how location amenities have differentially driven population and price dynamics in small towns versus big cities, with a focus on the role of housing supply. We provide theory and evidence that demand for high-amenity locations has increased in recent decades. High-amenity counties in large metropolitan areas have experienced relatively higher price increases, while high-amenity counties in small metros and rural areas have absorbed increased demand through population growth. This divergence in population dynamics between big cities and small towns was driven by domestic migration, with high-amenity small towns and rural areas experiencing significant domestic in-migration.”
From a new paper by Heidi Artigue, Jeffrey Brinkman, and Svyatoslav Karnasevych:
“As house prices continue to rise in large, supply-constrained cities, what are the implications for other places that have room to grow? Recent literature suggests that amenities that improve quality of life are becoming increasingly important in location decisions. In this paper, we explore how location amenities have differentially driven population and price dynamics in small towns versus big cities,
Posted by 11:42 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Tuesday, December 20, 2022
From Real Estate Finance and Economics Network:
“A conference was organized by the Alter Property Data Network on November 21st, 2022, hosted by ReFinE/Institut Louis Bachelier. This network gathers economists, data scientists and practitioners from all over the world (from the IMF, World Bank, OECD, European Commission, BIS, central banks, universities…) who share information, data, programs and papers on alternative techniques (web-scraping, mobile data, satellite data, machine learning, text mining…) related to housing and construction in general.
(…)
The theme of this conference was: To what extent do alternative techniques (web-scraping, satellite data…) help to better understand what happened during the Covid crisis in housing and construction?
After a transversal introductory statement by Yunhui Zhao (IMF), this conference gave insights mainly from two different perspectives, first showing how alternative tools such as web-scraping or satellite data can give additional information on real estate during the Covid-19 and showing the latest developments on methodological tools on housing and construction.
The first part included:
The second part on methodological tools included the following presentations:
From Real Estate Finance and Economics Network:
“A conference was organized by the Alter Property Data Network on November 21st, 2022, hosted by ReFinE/Institut Louis Bachelier. This network gathers economists, data scientists and practitioners from all over the world (from the IMF, World Bank, OECD, European Commission, BIS, central banks, universities…) who share information, data, programs and papers on alternative techniques (web-scraping, mobile data, satellite data, machine learning, text mining…) related to housing and construction in general.
Posted by 10:09 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Subscribe to: Posts