Friday, January 31, 2020
On cross-country:
On the US:
On other countries:
On cross-country:
On the US:
Posted by 5:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Thursday, January 30, 2020
From an IMF article:
“South Africa suffers among the highest levels of inequality in the world when measured by the commonly used Gini index. Inequality manifests itself through a skewed income distribution, unequal access to opportunities, and regional disparities. Low growth and rising unemployment have contributed to the persistence of inequality.
The South African government has used different tools to tackle the stubborn levels of inequality that have plagued the country, including through progressive fiscal redistribution.
Efforts to reduce inequality have focused on higher social spending, targeted government transfers, and affirmative action to diversify wealth ownership and promote entrepreneurship among the previously marginalized. These measures need to be complemented with reforms that promote private investment, jobs, and inclusive growth.
Here are six charts that tell the story of South Africa’s inequality:
Inequality has remained stubbornly high. South Africa started the 1990s with already elevated inequality as the policy of apartheid excluded a large swath of the population from economic opportunities. South Africa’s Gini—an index that measures inequality—has increased further in the early 2000s and has remained high ever since. Meanwhile, its peers have been able to make inroads in reducing inequality.
Income distribution remains highly skewed. The top 20 percent of the population holds over 68 percent of income (compared to a median of 47 percent for similar emerging markets). The bottom 40 percent of the population holds 7 percent of income (compared to 16 percent for other emerging markets). Similar trends can be observed across other measures, such as the income share of the top 1 percent.
Significant disparities remain across regions. Income per capita in Gauteng—the main economic province that comprises large cities like Johannesburg and Pretoria—is almost twice the levels as that found in the mostly rural provinces like Limpopo and Eastern Cape. Being close to the economic centers increases job and income prospects.”
From an IMF article:
“South Africa suffers among the highest levels of inequality in the world when measured by the commonly used Gini index. Inequality manifests itself through a skewed income distribution, unequal access to opportunities, and regional disparities. Low growth and rising unemployment have contributed to the persistence of inequality.
The South African government has used different tools to tackle the stubborn levels of inequality that have plagued the country,
Posted by 11:42 AM
atLabels: Inclusive Growth
Friday, January 24, 2020
On cross-country:
On the US:
On other countries:
On cross-country:
On the US:
Posted by 5:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Thursday, January 23, 2020
From Curbed:
“Housing availability and affordability will help determine these states’ trajectories this year
Texas and California represent opposite poles on the spectrum of government ideology—the Golden State’s Democratic supermajority versus the conservative Lone Star State’s regulation-averse independent streak—and in recent years, starkly different results when it comes to housing policy and production.
Predictions for this coming year highlight the divide. According to the recently released Texas A&M Real Estate Center’s outlook for 2020, the state’s homebuilding industry will still have a banner year, despite forecasts for muted economic growth.
“Both the Texas and U.S. economy will likely slow in 2020 yet still register solid growth,” says Real Estate Center research economist Luis Torres. “With uncertainty around trade wars and the current crude oil trajectory, two of the strongest economic drivers for Texas will decrease economic momentum. In contrast, one of the star performers of the 2020 economy will be the housing market, with double-digit growth in new home construction for the first time since 2017.”
California flips that idea on its head. Instead of attracting residents with a surfeit of new housing options despite low growth, it’s posting job growth above the national average, even beating the economies of many European nations when it comes to growth and performance metrics, yet still pushing away many residents—making it harder for lower- and middle-income residents to stay—as a result of soaring housing prices and continued difficulty building new supply.”
Continue reading here.
From Curbed:
“Housing availability and affordability will help determine these states’ trajectories this year
Texas and California represent opposite poles on the spectrum of government ideology—the Golden State’s Democratic supermajority versus the conservative Lone Star State’s regulation-averse independent streak—and in recent years, starkly different results when it comes to housing policy and production.
Predictions for this coming year highlight the divide. According to the recently released Texas A&M Real Estate Center’s outlook for 2020,
Posted by 9:53 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Wednesday, January 22, 2020
From the IMF’s latest report on Estonia:
“Real estate market activity has moderated, and prices remained anchored to incomes. Transactions in the housing market slowed by 1.6 percent (y/y) in 2018, compared to an increase of 8.2 percent the previous year. House prices increased by 5.7 percent in 2018, driven by the rising share of new houses (…). Furthermore, the ratio of total liabilities to gross wages and salaries declined further from 114 percent in 2017 to 109 percent last year, suggesting a continued reduction in household leverage. Overall price trends remain strong, but aligned to income growth. During 2019H1, there were similar transactions overall compared to 2018H1, but fewer transactions for new apartments. The average price increased by 5.9 percent as new dwellings are being added at a slower pace.”
From the IMF’s latest report on Estonia:
“Real estate market activity has moderated, and prices remained anchored to incomes. Transactions in the housing market slowed by 1.6 percent (y/y) in 2018, compared to an increase of 8.2 percent the previous year. House prices increased by 5.7 percent in 2018, driven by the rising share of new houses (…). Furthermore, the ratio of total liabilities to gross wages and salaries declined further from 114 percent in 2017 to 109 percent last year,
Posted by 9:57 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Subscribe to: Posts