Wednesday, February 7, 2018
From the IMF’s latest report on Malta:
“Strong momentum in the housing market may increase financial stability risks. Household balance sheets are generally sound with a low default rate and financial wealth exceeding peer levels. However, given the high exposure of core domestic banks to property-related loans, a sharp drop in house prices or increases in interest rates may lead to a negative spiral of low lending and investment and adverse macro-financial repercussions. Future unwinding of real estate investments by successful IIP applicants may also put downward pressure on housing prices. While staff does not see immediate financial stability risks, persistent strength in mortgage lending and sustained demand for properties without a corresponding increase in household income could lead to significant imbalances. Staff’s analysis—although subject to uncertainty—indicates that housing prices have entered a modest overvaluation territory by several metrics (Annex IV). Moreover, about 80 percent of the respondents to a recent central bank’s survey viewed residential properties as overpriced in 2016.
Steps to pre-empt a potential buildup of risks in the housing market are therefore warranted, including by:
- Deploying targeted macro-prudential limits for mortgages (e.g. limits on loan-to-value and debt service-to-income ratios) to enhance the resilience of bank and household balance sheets to a possible sharp reversal in market conditions. Closing the remaining data gaps on borrower characteristics would help calibrating these measures effectively.
- Ensuring that fiscal incentives do not amplify the housing cycle by aligning the tax rate on rental income with the tax rates on other sources of income. Introducing periodic reviews of the scope and parameters of the IIP, including the minimum real estate investment or leasing values, could help curb housing demand and may improve fiscal revenues’ predictability.
- Repairing corporate balance sheets in the construction sector to increase housing supply.
Accelerated delivery of social housing would mitigate the impact of rising housing prices on the poor. The government has taken measures to increase the availability of social housing units to low-income groups, including by incentivizing private investment through tax exemptions, and provision of financial incentives for the restoration of old properties to be loaned for social housing. Ensuring that eligibility criteria for rent subsidies and social home loans are prudently assessed and means-tested is important.
The authorities regarded property prices as broadly in line with fundamentals, but acknowledged strong demand pressures. They indicated that inflows of foreign workers and tourists are the key demand drivers in the housing market, with acute impact on rents. The reduced tax rate on rental income and the IIP were not viewed as major demand-side factors. The authorities emphasized that risks related to bank exposure to the property market are mitigated by the small fraction of buy-to-rent loans, the diversification of credit risk among many small borrowers, and conservative lending practices, including prudent haircuts on collateral values. However, they agreed that closing further data gaps is necessary, as they are evaluating possible macroprudential policies to mitigate financial stability risks. They intend to publish a White Paper with a view to strengthen the legal framework in the rental market, including through registration of rental contracts. They highlighted that several measures in the 2018 Budget will increase the availability of social housing.”
From the IMF’s latest report on Malta:
“Strong momentum in the housing market may increase financial stability risks. Household balance sheets are generally sound with a low default rate and financial wealth exceeding peer levels. However, given the high exposure of core domestic banks to property-related loans, a sharp drop in house prices or increases in interest rates may lead to a negative spiral of low lending and investment and adverse macro-financial repercussions.
Posted by 10:31 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
From the IMF’s latest report on Indonesia:
Posted by 10:23 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, February 2, 2018
Below is a list of papers put together by the Bank for International Settlements. The list shows the experience of emerging market economies with designing macroprudential frameworks and implementing macroprudential instruments.
Below is a list of papers put together by the Bank for International Settlements. The list shows the experience of emerging market economies with designing macroprudential frameworks and implementing macroprudential instruments.
Posted by 10:02 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
On cross-country:
On the US:
On other countries:
Photo by Aliis Sinisalu
On cross-country:
On the US:
Posted by 5:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
From a speech by IMF Deputy Managing Director Zhang Tao at the United Nations Investor Summit on Climate Risk
“We recently have seen the IMF appearing to step up its work on climate change. Why now?
The Short Answer: This is our response to the threat climate change poses to our planet—and the growing demand from our membership and the international community to respond.
The IMF has been involved in the climate change work for several years. Our recent work reflects compelling evidence that adapting to climate change is one of the most important challenges facing economic policy makers worldwide. The IMF also has an obligation as a member of international community to address the doubts about climate change with fact-based analysis.
The Long Answer: the Fund’s core mandate is to ensure economic stability and resilience. Climate change could prove to be a destabilizing force for the global economy if it is not addressed.
The macroeconomic impact of climate change was illustrated by the especially damaging hurricane season last year in the Caribbean and the U.S. We certainly will see more frequent and more damaging such natural disasters in the future.
So, the key question is what we can do—and do better—in helping policymakers confront the challenges of climate change?
Two key areas of work are: mitigation, which includes helping countries meet their commitments under the Paris Agreement to reduce emissions; and adaptation, which focuses on building resilience to climate change. Our general message to our membership with regard to meeting the goals of the Paris agreement to contain emissions is to “price it right; tax it smart; and do it now.” ”
Continue reading here.
From a speech by IMF Deputy Managing Director Zhang Tao at the United Nations Investor Summit on Climate Risk
“We recently have seen the IMF appearing to step up its work on climate change. Why now?
The Short Answer: This is our response to the threat climate change poses to our planet—and the growing demand from our membership and the international community to respond.
The IMF has been involved in the climate change work for several years.
Posted by 1:30 AM
atLabels: Energy & Climate Change
Subscribe to: Posts