Monday, September 11, 2017
My paper “Okun’s Law: Fit at Fifty?” (with Larry Ball and Daniel Leigh) has now been published in the October 2017 issue of the Journal of Money, Credit & Banking. For those without access to the journal, here is a link to the penultimate version of the paper, which also provides the data and programs needed to replicate the results of the paper. The main result of the paper is that, fifty five years after it was proposed, Okun’s Law remains visible to the naked eye (see the chart below). We find that, for the United States, Okun’s Law is fairly stable and held up during the Great Recession, substantiating predictions that Paul Krugman made in 2011. We also provide evidence for several other advanced economies, such as Spain and Germany.
My paper “Okun’s Law: Fit at Fifty?” (with Larry Ball and Daniel Leigh) has now been published in the October 2017 issue of the Journal of Money, Credit & Banking. For those without access to the journal, here is a link to the penultimate version of the paper, which also provides the data and programs needed to replicate the results of the paper. The main result of the paper is that,
Posted by 2:13 PM
atLabels: Inclusive Growth
Friday, September 8, 2017
On cross-country:
On the US:
On other countries:
On cross-country:
On the US:
Posted by 5:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Thursday, September 7, 2017
My tribute to Stan Fischer.
Stanley Fischer, Vice Chair of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System speaks during the seminar The Elusive Pursuit of Inflation during the 2015 IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings on Thursday, April 16 in Washington, D.C. IMF Photo/Ryan Rayburn
My tribute to Stan Fischer.
Stanley Fischer, Vice Chair of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System speaks during the seminar The Elusive Pursuit of Inflation during the 2015 IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings on Thursday, April 16 in Washington, D.C. IMF Photo/Ryan Rayburn
Posted by 1:12 PM
atLabels: Profiles of Economists
Tuesday, September 5, 2017
We study the impact of fluctuations in global oil prices on domestic inflation using an unbalanced panel of 72 advanced and developing economies over the period from 1970 to 2015. We find that a 10 percent increase in global oil inflation increases, on average, domestic inflation by about 0.4 percentage point on impact, with the effect vanishing after two years and being similar between advanced and developing economies. We also find that the effect is asymmetric, with positive oil price shocks having a larger effect than negative ones. The impact of oil price shocks, however, has declined over time due in large part to a better conduct of monetary policy. We further examine the transmission channels of oil price shocks on domestic inflation during the recent decades, by making use of a monthly dataset from 2000 to 2015. The results suggest that the share of transport in the CPI basket and energy subsidies are the most robust factors in explaining cross-country variations in the effects of oil price shocks during the this period.
Continue reading here.
We study the impact of fluctuations in global oil prices on domestic inflation using an unbalanced panel of 72 advanced and developing economies over the period from 1970 to 2015. We find that a 10 percent increase in global oil inflation increases, on average, domestic inflation by about 0.4 percentage point on impact, with the effect vanishing after two years and being similar between advanced and developing economies. We also find that the effect is asymmetric,
Posted by 4:42 PM
atLabels: Energy & Climate Change
Sunday, September 3, 2017
A BBC Radio 4 programme quoted my research:
“Prakash Loungani at the IMF analysed the accuracy of economic forecasters and found something remarkable and worrying. ‘The record of failure to predict recessions is virtually unblemished,’ he said.
His analysis revealed that economists had failed to predict 148 of the past 150 recessions. Part of the problem, he said, was that there wasn’t much of a reputational gain to be had by predicting a recession others had missed. If you disagreed with the consensus, you would be met with scepticism. The downside of getting it wrong was more personally damaging than the upside of getting it right.”
Continue reading here.
A BBC Radio 4 programme quoted my research:
“Prakash Loungani at the IMF analysed the accuracy of economic forecasters and found something remarkable and worrying. ‘The record of failure to predict recessions is virtually unblemished,’ he said.
His analysis revealed that economists had failed to predict 148 of the past 150 recessions. Part of the problem, he said, was that there wasn’t much of a reputational gain to be had by predicting a recession others had missed.
Posted by 12:11 AM
atLabels: Forecasting Forum
Subscribe to: Posts