Inclusive Growth

Global Housing Watch

Forecasting Forum

Energy & Climate Change

India’s Housing Market: What’s happened? What’s next?

From the Global Housing Watch Newsletter: September 2015



What’s happened to India’s housing market? There seems to be a slowdown and also a rising stock of unsold houses. This development has led to different views on India’s housing market. In a recent interview, Raghuram Rajan (Reserve Bank of India—RBI) said that “if real estate developers, who are sitting on unsold [housing] stocks, start bringing down prices, that will be a very big help to the sector because once there is a sense that the prices have stabilized more people will be willing to buy. (…) we also don’t want to create a situation where prices stay high at the level, which means demand can’t pick up (…)”. Similarly, the National Housing Bank (NHB) and Rayman Partners also agree that house prices are high. In terms of how long it will take to clear the housing inventory, Knight Frank says that “Mumbai has the highest number of unsold units in India (…). However, the NCR [National Capital Region] market will take the maximum time to liquidate its existing unsold inventory. At the current pace of sales, NCR will take more than four years to exhaust the unsold homes completely. Pune is currently the healthiest market, with the lowest QTS [quarters to sell unsold inventory] and a relatively lower age of unsold inventory”.

However, PropTiger and Farook Mahmood (Silverline Group and Chairman of NAR-India 7th Annual Convention) noted that when we talk about housing inventory data, we need to differentiate between the different types of inventory (e.g. ready-to-move-in vs. under-construction).

Also, the price of the unsold housing stock differs. For example, “69% of Mumbai’s unsold housing stock is priced above Rs. 1 Crore”, notes Ramesh Nair at Jones Lang LaSalle. Meanwhile, Irfan Razack (Prestige Group) stated that “(…) prices could come down only if the government reduced taxes related to property and ensured speedy approval of projects.” And Shashank Jain (PricewaterhouseCoopers) said “(…) developers were unlikely to drop base prices (…) if base prices were reduced, buyers may hold back purchases expecting more cuts in future. That would become counterproductive for the industry and economy.” Finally, a report by Ambit notes that there is “(…) a broad-based real estate pullback, with prices correcting in most tier I and tier II cities alongside sharp drops in transaction and new launch volumes. The drivers for this slowdown are a mix of supply-side factors (banks have pulled back lending to developers) and demand-side factors (the black money bill has created fear amongst speculators).”

What’s next for India’s housing market? “As the economic growth has started to take off, the overall buyer sentiment is expected to rise. Presumably, developers are counting on this to happen and hence holding the prices”, according to the RBI’s latest report. Meanwhile, PropTiger says that the housing market “(…) will soon be in better shape with the number of new launches likely to rise (…) when the festival season begins in October (…) the Q1 report predicts that the prices are not likely to fall in the near future.” On the unsold inventory, Knight Frank says that “(…) the unwinding process of the excess unsold inventory in these markets has already commenced since the first half of this year and (…) this process will continue for another six months in order to bring stability in the residential market. The deliberate slowdown in new launches undertaken by the real estate developer fraternity seems to be a pragmatic step in this direction and will hopefully lead the industry towards a path of sustainable development.” Finally, Shashank Jain says that “The inherent Indian demographics still makes the country’s real estate sector attractive. But if you are looking at short-term gains, then that continues to be a challenge (…) The long-term story is intact.”


More on India’s housing market. Charan Singh (Indian Institute of Management Bangalore) has studied the housing market in India. On India’s house price index, Singh notes that the NHB and RBI construct and release a house price index. But, there are a number of problems with both indices. NHB’s HPI “(…) is based on extensive data collected by different commercial banks and finance company located in 26 cities and is widely accepted in the country. Innovations that rely on data sources cannot be implemented until precise indices are provided in public domain and with robust history to inspire confidence. In India, neither data definitions are standardized nor is the methodology. The data is also collected by non-trained officials. The methodology of the RBI’s HPI is somewhat standardized but also has gaps. HPI only covers data collected from registration department of 9 cities but computes a national HPI based on that limited data set.” In a separate study, Singh compares India’s housing market with the United States and Spain and notes that there is need to have a well developed housing finance market in India.

From the Global Housing Watch Newsletter: September 2015

What’s happened to India’s housing market? There seems to be a slowdown and also a rising stock of unsold houses. This development has led to different views on India’s housing market. In a recent interview, Raghuram Rajan (Reserve Bank of India—RBI) said that “if real estate developers, who are sitting on unsold [housing] stocks, start bringing down prices, that will be a very big help to the sector because once there is a sense that the prices have stabilized more people will be willing to buy.

Read the full article…

Posted by at 9:00 AM

Labels: Global Housing Watch

The Stekler Award for Courage in Forecasting (Recessions Inaccurately)

My presentation at the Federal Forecasters Conference summarized my work on the inability or unwillingness of forecasters to predict recessions. I also suggested that to get forecasters to predict recessions (even inaccurately) we should have a Stekler Award for Courage in Forecasting. The award would be in honor of noted forecaster Herman Stekler who says that forecasters should predict recessions early and often and that he himself has predicted 9 of the last 5 recessions. If there was such an award, the 2015 award would go to Lakshman Achuthan of ECRI, who called for a U.S. recession in 2012 in September 2011. ECRI recently explained why it made the call, which is worth reading—the link is given in my presentation. In the running for the 2016 award would be Michael Shedlock (“Mish”) who at the start of this year predicted that Canada and the U.S. would slip into recession this year.

My presentation at the Federal Forecasters Conference summarized my work on the inability or unwillingness of forecasters to predict recessions. I also suggested that to get forecasters to predict recessions (even inaccurately) we should have a Stekler Award for Courage in Forecasting. The award would be in honor of noted forecaster Herman Stekler who says that forecasters should predict recessions early and often and that he himself has predicted 9 of the last 5 recessions. Read the full article…

Posted by at 2:00 PM

Labels: Forecasting Forum

Developments in Israel’s Housing Market

The IMF’s latest report on Israel points out that “To contain further housing price increases, supply needs to be boosted. Concerted efforts among relevant ministries and local governments are needed. To contain the increase in leverage, macroprudential measures should be used.”

Another IMF report compares the system of taxation on housing in Israel with other countries. It finds that “The current framework of housing taxation in Israel is broadly in line with global standards, but with few elements that have likely increased underlying demand for housing. (…) The Israeli government has appropriately taken steps to tighten the eligibility of exemptions for the capital gains, acquisition tax, and gift taxes. (…) Addressing the supply-side issues will be critical.”

The IMF’s latest report on Israel points out that “To contain further housing price increases, supply needs to be boosted. Concerted efforts among relevant ministries and local governments are needed. To contain the increase in leverage, macroprudential measures should be used.”

Another IMF report compares the system of taxation on housing in Israel with other countries. It finds that “The current framework of housing taxation in Israel is broadly in line with global standards,

Read the full article…

Posted by at 9:00 AM

Labels: Global Housing Watch

Housing Market in Saudi Arabia

“The government is continuing to implement its program to provide affordable housing. In light of the growing population and reported high house prices in the major cities, this is a considerable challenge. Estimates suggest that 160-180,000 new homes will need to be built each year over the next few years to meet growing demand. The government has allocated SR 250 billion from the budget surplus fund for the program, and the Ministry of Housing is continuing to develop options to support buyers which include the provision of interest-free loans (up to SR 500,000), and the payment of interest on behalf of the borrower for mortgage loans taken out from banks. The provision of support to buyers is being allocated according to a points system that favors those with greater need. On the supply side, options being developed include the provision of free public sector land and the proposed “white lands tax” which would increase the land available for housing”, according to the IMF’s annual report on Saudi Arabia.


The report also “(…) emphasized the need for ensuring that the housing needs of the population are met in a cost-effective way while minimizing the disruption to private real estate and mortgage markets. Housing is appropriately an important policy priority, but the program cost is high and to date it has moved slowly. Measures to expand supply should include a strengthened role for the government acting as a facilitator and regulator rather than a developer to help expand housing supply in a cost effective way. In this context, streamlining regulatory and approval processes to achieve efficiency gains could improve the functioning of private real estate markets. With respect to the support for buyers, financing should be targeted to those who are unable to obtain financing from banks or finance companies, and focus on purchases of new dwellings to avoid bidding real estate prices up further.”

“The government is continuing to implement its program to provide affordable housing. In light of the growing population and reported high house prices in the major cities, this is a considerable challenge. Estimates suggest that 160-180,000 new homes will need to be built each year over the next few years to meet growing demand. The government has allocated SR 250 billion from the budget surplus fund for the program, and the Ministry of Housing is continuing to develop options to support buyers which include the provision of interest-free loans (up to SR 500,000), Read the full article…

Posted by at 9:00 AM

Labels: Global Housing Watch

Israel’s Labor Market: High Inequality, Low Productivity

A new IMF report provides an in-depth look at Israel’s labor market:

  • Inequality in Israel is among the highest in the OECD (this refers to net income inequality, that is, inequality of income after tax and transfers). The income share of the richest 10 percent of people is 13 times the share of the bottom 10 percent, a ratio that is exceeded only by the United States. Real disposable incomes of the top decile have increased since the 1980s, while incomes of the bottom decile have stagnated. Israel’s Gini coefficient of disposable income is among the highest in the OECD.
  • Average incomes in Israel are similar to those in Korea and New Zealand but well below the level in richer Western European countries and the United States. There was rapid catch-up toward U.S. incomes between 1950 and the mid- 1970s, but since then Israel’s average income has stagnated at around 60 percent of US average incomes.
  • Part of this stagnation is due to low productivity growth. One reason may be that Israel is the most restrictive amongst advanced economies in terms of product market regulations—state control, barriers to entrepreneurship, and barriers to trade and investment all rank amongst the highest across its peers.. In terms of sectors, Israel ranks amongst the highest in regulation of network sectors, retail trade and professional services.

A new IMF report provides an in-depth look at Israel’s labor market:

  • Inequality in Israel is among the highest in the OECD (this refers to net income inequality, that is, inequality of income after tax and transfers). The income share of the richest 10 percent of people is 13 times the share of the bottom 10 percent, a ratio that is exceeded only by the United States. Real disposable incomes of the top decile have increased since the 1980s,

Read the full article…

Posted by at 5:58 PM

Labels: Inclusive Growth

Newer Posts Home Older Posts

Subscribe to: Posts