Tuesday, November 25, 2025
From a paper by Puneet Vatsa, Gabriel Pino, Dragan Miljkovic:
“Using partially identified Bayesian structural vector autoregressions, we examine how food price shocks have influenced core inflation and inflation expectations in the United States since 1990. This is important, given the conspicuousness of food prices and the substantial share of food expenditure in households’ budgets. Shocks raised one-year expectations immediately, with effects lasting nine quarters; they increased core inflation with a short delay. Long-term expectations were largely unaffected. Counterfactuals show that one-year expectations would have been lower in 2020 and 2022 without these shocks. The findings suggest food price shocks warrant a measured response, not an overreaction, from central banks.”
From a paper by Puneet Vatsa, Gabriel Pino, Dragan Miljkovic:
“Using partially identified Bayesian structural vector autoregressions, we examine how food price shocks have influenced core inflation and inflation expectations in the United States since 1990. This is important, given the conspicuousness of food prices and the substantial share of food expenditure in households’ budgets. Shocks raised one-year expectations immediately, with effects lasting nine quarters; they increased core inflation with a short delay.
Posted by at 9:49 AM
Labels: Energy & Climate Change
Saturday, November 22, 2025
From a paper by Zhining Hu, Linus Nyiwul, and Niraj P. Koirala:
“This paper investigates the impact of food price inflation on gender inequality based on a panel dataset of 130 developing countries from 1990 to 2022. Applying the dynamic panel estimation techniques, including the system generalized method of moments (system GMM) and fixed-effects panel instrumental variable (panel IV) approaches, we find that food inflation significantly increases gender inequality, especially in areas such as education, labor market, health, and food security. The inflationary impact on gender inequality is strongest for staple food items like potatoes, wheat, and eggs, which are most fundamental to household consumption and care work activities typically performed by women. Since gender inequality, defined as the unequal distribution of resources, opportunities, and rights between men and women across key social and economic dimensions, is shaped by structural, cultural, and institutional factors, we further conduct heterogeneity analyses. The results reveal that poorer countries and African region are more exposed to the gendered effect of food price inflation, whereas countries with stronger institutional frameworks, such as those in OECD and Latin America, have a buffering influence. Synthetic control studies further show that the 2007–2008 food crisis had a more profound and long-lasting effect on gender inequality compared to the 2021–2022 food crisis, which was mainly driven by labor market differentials in female participation and wage earnings. These consistent results call for gender-responsive policy interventions to mitigate the adverse effects of food price inflation on gender inequality and shield women from escalating burdens induced by food inflation.”
From a paper by Zhining Hu, Linus Nyiwul, and Niraj P. Koirala:
“This paper investigates the impact of food price inflation on gender inequality based on a panel dataset of 130 developing countries from 1990 to 2022. Applying the dynamic panel estimation techniques, including the system generalized method of moments (system GMM) and fixed-effects panel instrumental variable (panel IV) approaches, we find that food inflation significantly increases gender inequality, especially in areas such as education,
Posted by at 10:46 AM
Labels: Inclusive Growth
On cross-country:
Working papers and conferences:
On China:
On Australia and New Zealand:
On other countries:
On cross-country:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, November 21, 2025
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
On sales, permits, starts, and supply:
On other developments:
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Monday, November 17, 2025
From a paper by Mulu Gebreeyesus, and Getachew Ahmed Abegaz:
“This paper analyzes Ethiopia’s structural transformation from 2000 to 2022 across four
dimensions: employment, productivity, skill intensity, and tradability. While the country achieved
strong economic growth, averaging 8.9 percent annually, its structural transformation has been
uneven and incomplete. Labor has shifted out of agriculture, but mainly into low-productivity
informal services, while manufacturing’s employment share declined despite policy support.
Aggregate productivity growth, though substantial, was driven largely by within-sector gains, with
minimal contribution from labor reallocation. High-productivity sectors, including manufacturing
and modern services, remain small, capital-intensive, and poorly connected to employment and
exports. Ethiopia’s tradable sector is narrow, dominated by agricultural commodities and air
transport, with limited value-added in manufacturing and ICT. Comparative analysis shows that
while Ethiopia has outpaced many African peers in productivity, it lags in employment absorption
and export diversification, contrasting sharply with East Asia’s inclusive, manufacturing-led
growth. The findings point to a disconnect between output growth and structural inclusion.
Addressing this requires a hybrid strategy that expands labor-intensive manufacturing, upgrades
informal services, aligns skills with market demand, and diversifies tradable activities. Ethiopia’s
experience offers a critical lesson for other developing countries: sustained transformation
depends not only on growth, but on how this growth reallocates labor and resources toward more
productive sectors.”
From a paper by Mulu Gebreeyesus, and Getachew Ahmed Abegaz:
“This paper analyzes Ethiopia’s structural transformation from 2000 to 2022 across four
dimensions: employment, productivity, skill intensity, and tradability. While the country achieved
strong economic growth, averaging 8.9 percent annually, its structural transformation has been
uneven and incomplete. Labor has shifted out of agriculture, but mainly into low-productivity
informal services, while manufacturing’s employment share declined despite policy support.
Posted by at 11:06 AM
Labels: Inclusive Growth
Subscribe to: Posts