Tuesday, July 1, 2025
From a paper by Glen Biglaiser , Ibrahim Kocaman , Sebastian M Saiegh , and Ronald McGauvran:
“The association between tax havens and income distribution in home states of multinational corporations has attracted much attention. However, studies have not empirically investigated whether there is also a relationship between low-tax jurisdictions and income inequality in host countries. Our findings, based on data from 152 countries spanning 1972–2020 and a range of econometric strategies, reveal a robust positive relationship between tax haven status and domestic income inequality, with tax havens associated with higher market-income (i.e. pretax and pretransfer) Gini indexes, and estimated postadoption Gini coefficients being larger by an average of 0.54 compared to what would be expected based on global trends, country characteristics, and observable economic factors. We also observe that compensatory tax policies, as well as the type of economic activities attracted by tax havens and their implications for labor markets, seem to mediate this relationship. Our results suggest that low-tax jurisdictions economically harm lower income groups in host countries.”
From a paper by Glen Biglaiser , Ibrahim Kocaman , Sebastian M Saiegh , and Ronald McGauvran:
“The association between tax havens and income distribution in home states of multinational corporations has attracted much attention. However, studies have not empirically investigated whether there is also a relationship between low-tax jurisdictions and income inequality in host countries. Our findings, based on data from 152 countries spanning 1972–2020 and a range of econometric strategies,
Posted by 4:15 PM
atLabels: Inclusive Growth
Sunday, June 29, 2025
From a paper by İrfan Çerçil, and Gorkem Aksaray:
“Income and wealth inequality have been steadily rising in developed countries since the 1970s. Unconventional monetary policy has recently come under increasing scrutiny for its role in exacerbating this trend. In response to the 2008 global financial crisis, central banks in many developed countries have started to engage in large-scale asset purchase programs (APPs), also known as quantitative easing (QE), to stimulate their economies. This paper investigates how these policies have influenced inequality. Using panel data from 49 countries between 1999 and 2019, we apply Jordà’s (2005) local projections (LP) method to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE) of APPs on income and wealth inequality. To deal with endogeneity, we use propensity scores and the augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) estimator. Our results reveal a discernible relationship between APPs and increased inequality. Specifically, we find that while the impact of APPs on income inequality fades over time, their effect on wealth inequality are more pronounced and persistent. Our research contributes to the ongoing debate about the distributional consequences of unconventional monetary policy and offers practical insights for policymakers.”
From a paper by İrfan Çerçil, and Gorkem Aksaray:
“Income and wealth inequality have been steadily rising in developed countries since the 1970s. Unconventional monetary policy has recently come under increasing scrutiny for its role in exacerbating this trend. In response to the 2008 global financial crisis, central banks in many developed countries have started to engage in large-scale asset purchase programs (APPs), also known as quantitative easing (QE), to stimulate their economies.
Posted by 8:27 AM
atLabels: Inclusive Growth
Saturday, June 28, 2025
On cross-country:
Working papers and conferences:
On China:
On other countries:
On cross-country:
Working papers and conferences:
On China:
Posted by 5:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, June 27, 2025
From a book chapter by Ted Schrecker and Clare Bambra:
“‘Austerity is the calling card of neoliberalism’, wrote Lancet editor Richard Horton in 2017. We describe the austerity of US welfare ‘reforms’ of the 1990s and then identify the 2007–2008 financial crisis as the window of opportunity for austerity in Europe. In the UK, we focus specifically on effects on the health effects on low-income households, local government services, and the National Health Service—all negative, sometimes disastrously so. Both in the UK and in the US, impacts fell disproportionately on the poorest and most vulnerable people and regions. Effects on poverty and its sequelae were especially severe. Predictably, health inequalities in the UK increased. We conclude with a provocative description of austerity as a large-scale human experiment, analogous to the structural adjustment programmes that were used to promote neoliberalism starting in the 1980s, and with one scholar’s description of austerity in the UK as a human rights violation.”
From a book chapter by Ted Schrecker and Clare Bambra:
“‘Austerity is the calling card of neoliberalism’, wrote Lancet editor Richard Horton in 2017. We describe the austerity of US welfare ‘reforms’ of the 1990s and then identify the 2007–2008 financial crisis as the window of opportunity for austerity in Europe. In the UK, we focus specifically on effects on the health effects on low-income households, local government services,
Posted by 9:33 AM
atLabels: Inclusive Growth
From a book chapter by Ted Schrecker and Clare Bambra:
“‘The inequality machine is reshaping the planet’, wrote the editor of Le Monde Diplomatique in 2013. Rising inequality of income and wealth is one of the distinguishing characteristics of the neoliberal era; we provide descriptions first on a global scale and then on the national, noting the role of labour market transformations and the financial crisis. Poverty is a manifestation of inequality with especially negative consequences for health; we examine trends in the UK and the US, and contrast them with the simultaneous increases in wealth accumulation. We then provide three more focussed case examples: spatial inequalities in health in England; incarceration in the US; and unequal distribution of risks and benefits from the activities that generate climate change. We conclude with a review of evidence that economic inequality makes life worse for almost everyone in the societies affected, not just those at its sharp end.”
From a book chapter by Ted Schrecker and Clare Bambra:
“‘The inequality machine is reshaping the planet’, wrote the editor of Le Monde Diplomatique in 2013. Rising inequality of income and wealth is one of the distinguishing characteristics of the neoliberal era; we provide descriptions first on a global scale and then on the national, noting the role of labour market transformations and the financial crisis. Poverty is a manifestation of inequality with especially negative consequences for health;
Posted by 9:32 AM
atLabels: Inclusive Growth
Subscribe to: Posts