Monday, December 6, 2021
From the Energy Institute at Haas:
“New research examines the role of individuals versus places in determining household carbon emissions.
The average household in San Francisco emits 36 percent less CO2 from residential and transportation energy use than the average household in Houston. Within the San Francisco Bay Area, the top 10 Census tracts with the highest household carbon emissions emit, on average, 5.6 times more per capita than the 10 lowest emissions Census tracts. Researchers and policy makers have recently highlighted the tremendous spatial variation in household carbon emissions, both within and across cities. See e.g. here and here.
Some of these differences can be explained by household characteristics, such as household size and income; some can be explained by gas versus electric heating or type of automobile. The remaining variation has historically been attributed to characteristics of the places themselves and how various amenities (e.g., climate, density, public transit, walkability) correlate with average carbon footprints.
This spatial variability could present an opportunity – perhaps we can learn from these places with low carbon footprints to better design and implement similar policies and practices nationwide in a quest to decarbonize the US economy.
A new paper by the Energy Institute’s own Eva Lyubich, available here as a new Energy Institute working paper, explores these issues in detail. The starting point of her paper is to recognize that people make choices about where they live, so different types of people live in different types of cities. Some people want to live in cities where they can drive to work, others prefer to commute via public transit or bike or walking. Some people want to live in a 3-bedroom house with a yard and others prefer an apartment building near lots of other people and restaurants. Through this lens, one quickly starts to realize that a lot of the differences we see in household carbon emissions across the US come from a mix of the characteristics of a particular place and the characteristics and preferences of people who choose to live there.”
Continue reading here.
From the Energy Institute at Haas:
“New research examines the role of individuals versus places in determining household carbon emissions.
The average household in San Francisco emits 36 percent less CO2 from residential and transportation energy use than the average household in Houston. Within the San Francisco Bay Area, the top 10 Census tracts with the highest household carbon emissions emit, on average, 5.6 times more per capita than the 10 lowest emissions Census tracts.
Posted by 12:04 PM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Excerpts from the National Bureau of Economic Research’s (NBER) recent working paper (2021) by authors Jacob Greenspon and Lawrence H. Summers of the Harvard Kennedy School of Government and Anna M. Stansbury of MIT Sloan School of Management:
“We study the productivity-pay relationship in the United States and Canada along two dimensions. The first is divergence: the degree to which the levels of productivity and pay have diverged. The second is delinkage: the degree to which incremental increases in the rate of productivity growth translate into incremental increases in the rate of growth of pay, holding all else equal. We show that in both countries the pay of typical workers has diverged substantially from average labor productivity over recent decades, driven by both rising labor income inequality and a declining labor share of income. Even as the levels of productivity and pay have grown further apart, we find evidence for some linkage between productivity and pay in both countries: a one percentage point increase in the rate of productivity growth is associated with a positive increase in the rate of pay growth, holding all else equal. This linkage appears stronger in the US than in Canada. Overall, our findings lead us to tentatively conclude that policies or trends which lead to incremental increases in productivity growth, particularly in large relatively closed economies like the USA, will tend to raise middle-class incomes. At the same time, other factors orthogonal to productivity growth have been driving productivity and typical pay further apart, emphasizing that much of the evolution in middle-class living standards will depend on measures bearing on relative incomes.”
Click here to read the full paper.
Excerpts from the National Bureau of Economic Research’s (NBER) recent working paper (2021) by authors Jacob Greenspon and Lawrence H. Summers of the Harvard Kennedy School of Government and Anna M. Stansbury of MIT Sloan School of Management:
“We study the productivity-pay relationship in the United States and Canada along two dimensions. The first is divergence: the degree to which the levels of productivity and pay have diverged. The second is delinkage: the degree to which incremental increases in the rate of productivity growth translate into incremental increases in the rate of growth of pay,
Posted by 9:18 AM
atLabels: Inclusive Growth
Sunday, December 5, 2021
*Note that this post will be updated as links to papers and presentations become available. Last updated: January 9, 2022.
On Covid-19 and health
On house prices
On mortgage market
On rental market
On inequality
On climate change and natural disasters
On housing supply and affordability
On other papers
*Note that this post will be updated as links to papers and presentations become available. Last updated: January 9, 2022.
On Covid-19 and health
Posted by 2:01 PM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Saturday, December 4, 2021
Ahead of December 3rd, 2021 that marked the international day of disabilities, the World Bank Group released its regional report titled, ‘Disability-Inclusion in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Path to Sustainable Development’, calling for the inclusion of nearly 85 million disabled persons, making up 14.7% of the entire population of the world today.
The report quantifies the magnitude of the problem by taking a life-cycle approach. It sheds light on the disappointing fact that nearly 15% of specially-abled children are not able to access education in the world, and even among those who do- dropouts are increasingly the norm. Besides, there is the added burden of social stigma preventing parents from sending children to school, and the segregation that happens in classrooms. Later in life, it has been observed that nearly 1 in every 2 heads of households who live with a disability do not participate in the labor market, thus depressing incomes and future prospects of later generations. The report also deliberates upon the compounding factor with which such deprivations get exacerbated, such as racial and religious differences especially for Africans, Latinos, and people from the Caribbean.
Delving deeper into the prevalence of discrimination in public spaces, jobs, educational opportunities, and other social events, the report goes on to discuss measures to combat such problems such as the use of data to design better-targeted policies, increased participation of the disabled in policymaking procedures, the government’s role in improving access to facilities and public goods, etc.
Click here to read the full blog and access the executive summary of the report.
Ahead of December 3rd, 2021 that marked the international day of disabilities, the World Bank Group released its regional report titled, ‘Disability-Inclusion in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Path to Sustainable Development’, calling for the inclusion of nearly 85 million disabled persons, making up 14.7% of the entire population of the world today.
The report quantifies the magnitude of the problem by taking a life-cycle approach. It sheds light on the disappointing fact that nearly 15% of specially-abled children are not able to access education in the world,
Posted by 12:06 PM
atLabels: Inclusive Growth
Friday, December 3, 2021
In a recent piece (2021), researchers at McKinsey & Company discuss the merits of a data-based approach to food security by tailoring nutritional offerings, and how building out partner networks can help payers realize the potential of food-support programs. They elaborate upon some of the recently adopted nutrition benefit programs by payers in the USA that have helped the society overcome major medical bumps, helped payers retain members and reduce costs.
The article then discusses some of the barriers to scaling up adoption of such nutritional benefit programs, including issues the need for accurate need assessment, designing proper interventions, forging stakeholder partnerships, and measuring and precise reporting of outcomes of the rolled out intervention properly to ensure ease of replication of a similar program elsewhere. On similar lines, it provides insights on how policymakers can overcome each of these barriers for improving health outcomes of the vulnerable communities, besides realizing tremendous social benefit in the form of reduced care costs.
Click here to read the full article.
In a recent piece (2021), researchers at McKinsey & Company discuss the merits of a data-based approach to food security by tailoring nutritional offerings, and how building out partner networks can help payers realize the potential of food-support programs. They elaborate upon some of the recently adopted nutrition benefit programs by payers in the USA that have helped the society overcome major medical bumps, helped payers retain members and reduce costs.
The article then discusses some of the barriers to scaling up adoption of such nutritional benefit programs,
Posted by 2:34 PM
atLabels: Inclusive Growth
Subscribe to: Posts