Friday, December 13, 2024
From a paper by Yiran Zhao, Xiangyun Gao, Huiling Zheng, Yupeng Zhang, Qingru Sun, Anjian Wang, and HaiZhong An:
“This study examines the impact of international crude oil prices on national sub-price indices following external shocks. It analyzes the heterogeneous transmission mechanisms of these shocks across diverse national price index networks. To achieve this, we employ Granger causality tests as the filter to construct impulse response networks. This approach helps unveil the duration, magnitude, and pathways of impact on sub-price indices in five countries: China, the US, Russia, Germany, and the UK. Our findings suggest that the impact of crude oil price changes on national sub-price indices is most pronounced within 1-2 months, and more persistent on the Producer Price Index (PPI) than the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Identifying specific sub-price indices affected by shocks shows that China and the US are more significantly impacted. Moreover, identifying the transmission paths of crude oil price changes within a country’s internal price system underscores the significance of the CPI of transportation. This study of price transmission within countries offers key insights for managing economic shocks at the microeconomic level.”
From a paper by Yiran Zhao, Xiangyun Gao, Huiling Zheng, Yupeng Zhang, Qingru Sun, Anjian Wang, and HaiZhong An:
“This study examines the impact of international crude oil prices on national sub-price indices following external shocks. It analyzes the heterogeneous transmission mechanisms of these shocks across diverse national price index networks. To achieve this, we employ Granger causality tests as the filter to construct impulse response networks. This approach helps unveil the duration,
Posted by 8:16 AM
atLabels: Energy & Climate Change
From a paper by Paolo Di Lorenzo, and Eric Anthony Lacey:
“This paper provides an overview of issues related to fiscal consolidation drawing on the literature; it distills some lessons from fiscal consolidation episodes using a new database covering 196 countries from 2000 to 2023. The paper discusses the motives, timing, design, and political economy of fiscal consolidation, as well as its macroeconomic and social impacts. We find that fiscal consolidation is often necessary and successful in restoring fiscal sustainability by stopping debt accumulation, but less successful in lowering debt levels; moreover, it can also entail significant costs and trade-offs in terms of growth, poverty, and inequality. Composition also matters, as expenditure-based consolidations tend to be more successful than revenue-based consolidations and less likely to cause a deterioration in poverty rates or inequality. However, revenue gains usually play an important role starting in the second year of consolidation. Overall, the paper suggests that successful fiscal consolidation requires careful consideration of the economic context, the composition of adjustment, complementary economic policies, and communication and credibility of the strategy. The best way to implement fiscal adjustment is to establish a consolidation strategy in normal/non-crisis times} to ensure that governments do not have to rely on abrupt, pro-cyclical adjustments that may exhaust all buffers in the aftermath of a shock.”
From a paper by Paolo Di Lorenzo, and Eric Anthony Lacey:
“This paper provides an overview of issues related to fiscal consolidation drawing on the literature; it distills some lessons from fiscal consolidation episodes using a new database covering 196 countries from 2000 to 2023. The paper discusses the motives, timing, design, and political economy of fiscal consolidation, as well as its macroeconomic and social impacts. We find that fiscal consolidation is often necessary and successful in restoring fiscal sustainability by stopping debt accumulation,
Posted by 8:13 AM
atLabels: Inclusive Growth
From a paper by David M. Brickman:
“Over the past four decades, the multifamily housing market has grown and evolved significantly to become a much more prominent part of the US housing landscape. Since 1990, the total value of the multifamily housing stock has grown more than tenfold, from less than $600 million to more than $6
billion today, as both the number and value of multifamily housing units have steadily increased. Although a broad range of macroeconomic and demographic factors have contributed to this growth, the primary catalyst has been the establishment of well-functioning multifamily capital markets, defined by large liquid debt and equity markets and a largely unconstrained private rental market. Against this backdrop, multifamily housing has become a standout among commercial real estate in terms of capital flows and performance while disproportionately contributing to the nation’s supply of newly constructed housing at this moment of intense shortages and affordability challenges.
Given the success of the modern multifamily capital and housing markets, there is value in understanding their development to identify market areas in need of additional investment and to inform regional and global markets elsewhere. To that end, this brief identifies and examines key moments in the evolution of multifamily debt and equity flows from the late 1980s through today and their impact on capitalization rates, property values, housing supply, rental rates, and rent growth. The brief concludes with a discussion of policy implications.”
Continue reading here.
From a paper by David M. Brickman:
“Over the past four decades, the multifamily housing market has grown and evolved significantly to become a much more prominent part of the US housing landscape. Since 1990, the total value of the multifamily housing stock has grown more than tenfold, from less than $600 million to more than $6
billion today, as both the number and value of multifamily housing units have steadily increased.
Posted by 8:11 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
On cross-country:
Working papers and conferences:
On the US—developments on house prices, rent, permits and mortgage:
On the US—other developments:
On Australia and New Zealand:
On other countries:
On cross-country:
Working papers and conferences:
Posted by 5:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Wednesday, December 11, 2024
From a paper by Munseob Lee, Claudia Macaluso, and Felipe Schwartzman:
“Our paper addresses the heterogeneous effects of monetary policy on households of different races. The cyclical volatility of real income differs significantly for households of different races and income levels, reflecting differential exposure to fluctuations in employment and consumer prices. All Black households are disproportionately affected by employment fluctuations, whereas price volatility is only particularly pronounced for Black households with income above the national median. The latter face 40 percent higher price volatility than both poorer households of the same race and white households of similar income. To evaluate the effects of policy, we propose a New Keynesian framework with heterogeneous exposure to employment and price volatility. We find that an accommodative monetary stance generates asymmetric outcomes within race groups. Low-income households experience unemployment stabilization benefits, while high income ones incur real income volatility costs. Differences are especially large among Black households. Reducing the volatility of unemployment by 1 percentage point engenders a 1.17 percentage point reduction in overall income volatility for poorer Black households, but an increase of 0.6 percentage points in income volatility for richer Black households.”
From a paper by Munseob Lee, Claudia Macaluso, and Felipe Schwartzman:
“Our paper addresses the heterogeneous effects of monetary policy on households of different races. The cyclical volatility of real income differs significantly for households of different races and income levels, reflecting differential exposure to fluctuations in employment and consumer prices. All Black households are disproportionately affected by employment fluctuations, whereas price volatility is only particularly pronounced for Black households with income above the national median.
Posted by 1:05 PM
atLabels: Inclusive Growth
Subscribe to: Posts