Sunday, April 5, 2026
From a paper by Michael D. Bauer, Diego R. Känzig, and Glenn D. Rudebusch:
“Putting a price on carbon emissions helps mitigate climate change but may also raise overall price
inflation. Using high-frequency event studies based on regulatory news in the European carbon market,
we show that carbon price surprises generate significant increases not only in energy futures prices,
but also in inflation swap prices and breakeven inflation rates. These measures of market-based
inflation expectations respond positively at both short and long horizons, with significant effects up to
ten years out. Such long-lived inflationary consequences of climate policy are relevant for central
banks. However, despite the sustained increases in market-based inflation expectations, forwardlooking
nominal interest rates show no meaningful response to the carbon policy shocks, suggesting
that investors do not anticipate that the European Central Bank will lean against the inflationary effects
of higher carbon prices.”
From a paper by Michael D. Bauer, Diego R. Känzig, and Glenn D. Rudebusch:
“Putting a price on carbon emissions helps mitigate climate change but may also raise overall price
inflation. Using high-frequency event studies based on regulatory news in the European carbon market,
we show that carbon price surprises generate significant increases not only in energy futures prices,
but also in inflation swap prices and breakeven inflation rates.
Posted by at 8:47 PM
Labels: Forecasting Forum
Saturday, April 4, 2026
On cross-country:
Working papers and conferences:
On Australia and New Zealand:
On other countries:
On cross-country:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, April 3, 2026
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
On sales, permits, starts, and supply:
On other developments:
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Monday, March 30, 2026
From a VoxEU post by Karan Bhasin and Prakash Loungani:
“Many governments have to mitigate concerns about fiscal sustainability, without triggering near-term output losses or reversing progress on containing poverty or inequality. This column assesses how the design of fiscal consolidation packages shapes their impact on aggregate and distributional outcomes. It finds that the careful design of fiscal consolidation (making use of available monetary space or choosing tax-based instruments) can lower the output and unemployment costs of austerity and mitigate the adverse impacts on poverty and inequality. The results stress the importance of monetary-fiscal coordination for maintaining fiscal buffers, while limiting setbacks to development goals.”
From a VoxEU post by Karan Bhasin and Prakash Loungani:
“Many governments have to mitigate concerns about fiscal sustainability, without triggering near-term output losses or reversing progress on containing poverty or inequality. This column assesses how the design of fiscal consolidation packages shapes their impact on aggregate and distributional outcomes. It finds that the careful design of fiscal consolidation (making use of available monetary space or choosing tax-based instruments) can lower the output and unemployment costs of austerity and mitigate the adverse impacts on poverty and inequality.
Posted by at 7:37 AM
Labels: Inclusive Growth
Sunday, March 29, 2026
From a paper by Galina Hale, Michael Halling, Nora Alice. Paulus, and Han H.G. Pham:
“Limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees requires that cumulative carbon dioxide emissions remain
within a finite remaining carbon budget. How this budget is allocated across countries raises
questions of fairness and development. This paper evaluates whether equity-based carbon
allocations are compatible with sustained economic growth in emerging and developing economies.
We compute country-level fair shares of the remaining carbon budget under the equal-cumulativeper-
capita (ECPC) principle. Using data for 162 countries between 1950 and 2023, we then estimate
the historical relationship between income and per-capita CO2 emissions across income groups and
use these elasticities to simulate cumulative emissions until 2050. Our results show that ECPC
implies strongly negative remaining carbon budgets for most advanced economies, while lowerincome
countries retain positive but constrained allocations. Under historically observed income–
emissions elasticities, many developing countries would exceed their fair shares when converging
toward advanced-economy income levels. At the aggregate level, unused allocations offset only
17% of the combined carbon budget shortfall implied by countries exceeding their allocation and
the negative fair shares arising from historical responsibilities. In a scenario in which we assume
that the technology of advanced economies is transferred to all countries, the carbon budget
coverage increases to 38%.”
From a paper by Galina Hale, Michael Halling, Nora Alice. Paulus, and Han H.G. Pham:
“Limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees requires that cumulative carbon dioxide emissions remain
within a finite remaining carbon budget. How this budget is allocated across countries raises
questions of fairness and development. This paper evaluates whether equity-based carbon
allocations are compatible with sustained economic growth in emerging and developing economies.
We compute country-level fair shares of the remaining carbon budget under the equal-cumulativeper-
capita (ECPC) principle.
Posted by at 4:36 PM
Labels: Energy & Climate Change
Subscribe to: Posts