Sunday, December 7, 2025
From a paper by Radek Dědeček:
“This paper examines the influence of cross-border capital flows on income inequality in both origin and recipient countries. Using bilateral flow data and a panel dataset spanning 63 countries from 2005 to 2018, we employ panel regression analysis to investigate the effects of different types of capital. Our findings indicate that FDI inflows reduce income inequality in advanced countries by creating jobs and raising wages in sectors that employ lower-income individuals. Conversely, in developing countries, FDI often targets capital-intensive and high-skilled industries, increasing inequality. Portfolio investments generally increase inequality by driving up asset prices and creating instability, but can decrease inequality in emerging markets by supporting financial inclusion and reducing government financing costs. Specific scenarios, such as investments in tax havens or differences in human capital, show distinct results. Policymakers should regulate international capital flows through financial regulations, progressive taxation and international cooperation to mitigate their impact on income inequality.”
From a paper by Radek Dědeček:
“This paper examines the influence of cross-border capital flows on income inequality in both origin and recipient countries. Using bilateral flow data and a panel dataset spanning 63 countries from 2005 to 2018, we employ panel regression analysis to investigate the effects of different types of capital. Our findings indicate that FDI inflows reduce income inequality in advanced countries by creating jobs and raising wages in sectors that employ lower-income individuals.
Posted by at 7:41 AM
Labels: Inclusive Growth
Friday, December 5, 2025
From a paper by Behnaz Minooei Fard and Willi Semmler:
“In some academic and policy circles, carbon pricing, generally in the form of Cap & Trade or carbon taxes (see Metcalf and Stock (2020)), is often seen as a key strategy for tackling climate change and its associated risks. Others support directed technical change and direct investments in cleaner energy sources (see Acemoglu et al. (2012) and Aghion et al. (2022)). One can design theoretical and model-guided strategies and efficient or optimal paths to decarbonization of the economy. Politically, however, one of the most important issues is that significant behavioral constraints exist in actual policymaking. This paper provides an overview and survey of the strengths and weaknesses of either side of the decarbonization strategy and the role of behavioral drivers toward a low-carbon economy, assessed from the macro-and microeconomic perspectives.”
From a paper by Behnaz Minooei Fard and Willi Semmler:
“In some academic and policy circles, carbon pricing, generally in the form of Cap & Trade or carbon taxes (see Metcalf and Stock (2020)), is often seen as a key strategy for tackling climate change and its associated risks. Others support directed technical change and direct investments in cleaner energy sources (see Acemoglu et al. (2012) and Aghion et al. (2022)).
Posted by at 12:12 PM
Labels: Energy & Climate Change
Thursday, December 4, 2025
From a paper by Nigel Meade and Ciaran Driver:
“Policy makers are concerned with the accuracy of GDP forecasts and want to understand the reasons for the revision of forecasts. We study these issues by examining forecasts of annual UK GDP growth by a panel of agents, published monthly by HM Treasury. We focus on two main issues: the developing accuracy of the group-mean forecast as horizons shorten and the identification of information categories underlying agents’ forecast revisions. The accuracy of the group-mean forecast is poor; there is evidence of information rigidity in forecasts within the target year, and accuracy only improves in May of the target year when contemporary information flows lead to increased accuracy. We find a pessimism bias; the median errors of group-mean forecasts are increasingly positive for horizons shorter than 17months. We seek to explain revisions to both long- and short-horizon group-mean forecasts and individual agent forecasts. Modeling individual agents’ forecast revisions using a moving window, we note a consistent tendency by agents to revise their forecast towards the group-mean. Although their importance varied over time, the main information categories explaining revisions were, over longer horizons, the cost of finance, production, and a business confidence indicator. FX rates and inflation were influential over shorter horizons.”
From a paper by Nigel Meade and Ciaran Driver:
“Policy makers are concerned with the accuracy of GDP forecasts and want to understand the reasons for the revision of forecasts. We study these issues by examining forecasts of annual UK GDP growth by a panel of agents, published monthly by HM Treasury. We focus on two main issues: the developing accuracy of the group-mean forecast as horizons shorten and the identification of information categories underlying agents’
Posted by at 10:00 AM
Labels: Forecasting Forum
Saturday, November 29, 2025
On cross-country:
Working papers and conferences:
On China:
On Australia and New Zealand:
On other countries:
On cross-country:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, November 28, 2025
From a paper by Jérôme Creel and Jonas Kaiser:
“This paper introduces a novel application of the Updated Okun Method to estimate fiscal multipliers. By leveraging Okun’s Law to compute potential output and the output gap, we construct a new measure of the fiscal stance that improves transparency and interpretability. Applying this approach to France and Italy, we find that both economies were operating below full potential for most of the sample period, and that fiscal policy was more contractionary than standard estimates suggest. Our analysis reveals significant differences in fiscal multiplier effects across the two countries, with evidence of state-dependence in France, where fiscal policy is more effective during periods of economic slack, while no such variation is observed for Italy. These findings underscore the importance of aligning fiscal policy with economic conditions, particularly in the context of public debt sustainability debates.”
From a paper by Jérôme Creel and Jonas Kaiser:
“This paper introduces a novel application of the Updated Okun Method to estimate fiscal multipliers. By leveraging Okun’s Law to compute potential output and the output gap, we construct a new measure of the fiscal stance that improves transparency and interpretability. Applying this approach to France and Italy, we find that both economies were operating below full potential for most of the sample period,
Posted by at 9:50 AM
Labels: Inclusive Growth
Subscribe to: Posts