Monday, July 30, 2018
From a new IMF working paper by Davide Furceri and Aleksandra Zdzienicka:
“We provide new evidence of the existence of the “twin deficits” in developing economies. Using unanticipated government spending shocks for an unbalanced panel of 114 developing economies from 1990 to 2015, we find that a one percent of GDP unanticipated improvement in the government budget balance improves, on average, the current account balance by 0.8 percentage point of GDP. This effect is substantially larger than usually found in the literature using standard measures of fiscal policy changes such as the CAB. This finding has important policy implications as for a given target of external adjustment less fiscal consolidation is required than normally assumed.
Beyond this average effect lies some heterogeneity, both across states of the business cycle and across countries. The effect tends to be larger: (i) during recessions; (ii) in countries that are more open to trade; (iii) that have less flexible exchange rate regimes; and (iv) with lower initial public debt-to-GDP ratios. This heterogeneity has far-reaching implications for policymakers in deciding the magnitude of the fiscal adjustment needed to address external imbalances.”
From a new IMF working paper by Davide Furceri and Aleksandra Zdzienicka:
“We provide new evidence of the existence of the “twin deficits” in developing economies. Using unanticipated government spending shocks for an unbalanced panel of 114 developing economies from 1990 to 2015, we find that a one percent of GDP unanticipated improvement in the government budget balance improves, on average, the current account balance by 0.8 percentage point of GDP.
Posted by at 10:16 AM
Labels: Macro Demystified
Sunday, July 29, 2018
A new post by Timothy Taylor says that “Making predictions is hard, especially about the future. It’s a comment that seems to have been attributed to everyone from Nostradamus to Niels Bohr to Yogi Berra. But it’s deeply true. Most of us have a tendency to make statements about the future with a high level of self-belief, avoid later reconsidering how wrong we were, and then make more statements. […] The questions of how to predict for what you don’t expect, and how to plan for what you don’t expect, are admittedly difficult. The ability to pivot smoothly to face the new challenge may be one of the most underrated skills in politics and management. ”
Continue reading here.
A new post by Timothy Taylor says that “Making predictions is hard, especially about the future. It’s a comment that seems to have been attributed to everyone from Nostradamus to Niels Bohr to Yogi Berra. But it’s deeply true. Most of us have a tendency to make statements about the future with a high level of self-belief, avoid later reconsidering how wrong we were, and then make more statements. […] The questions of how to predict for what you don’t expect,
Posted by at 3:45 PM
Labels: Forecasting Forum
From a new IMF working paper:
“We provide a systematic analysis of the properties of individual returns to wealth using twelve years of
population data from Norway’s administrative tax records. We document a number of novel results.
First, during our sample period individuals earn markedly different average returns on their financial
assets (a standard deviation of 14%) and on their net worth (a standard deviation of 8%). Second,
heterogeneity in returns does not arise merely from differences in the allocation of wealth between safe
and risky assets: returns are heterogeneous even within asset classes. Third, returns are positively
correlated with wealth: moving from the 10th to the 90th percentile of the financial wealth distribution
increases the return by 3 percentage points – and by 17 percentage points when the same exercise is
performed for the return to net worth. Fourth, wealth returns exhibit substantial persistence over time.
We argue that while this persistence partly reflects stable differences in risk exposure and assets scale,
it also reflects persistent heterogeneity in sophistication and financial information, as well as
entrepreneurial talent. Finally, wealth returns are (mildly) correlated across generations. We discuss the
implications of these findings for several strands of the wealth inequality debate.”
From a new IMF working paper:
“We provide a systematic analysis of the properties of individual returns to wealth using twelve years of
population data from Norway’s administrative tax records. We document a number of novel results.
First, during our sample period individuals earn markedly different average returns on their financial
assets (a standard deviation of 14%) and on their net worth (a standard deviation of 8%).
Posted by at 3:41 PM
Labels: Inclusive Growth
Friday, July 27, 2018
The IMF’s latest report on China says that:
The IMF’s latest report on China says that:
Posted by at 3:50 PM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
On the US:
On other countries:
Photo by Aliis Sinisalu
On the US:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Subscribe to: Posts