Sunday, March 15, 2020
From an article by Chye-Ching Huang and Chad Stone (both at Center on Budget and Policy Priorities):
“The COVID-19 pandemic demands an aggressive direct public health response to contain and treat the virus and strengthen health system capacity. Once policymakers enact legislation that House leaders are now negotiating with the Administration, Congress should move quickly to take further bold steps to achieve the dual and related aims of lessening the threat of a major recession and cushioning the financial blow for millions of Americans, including measures to shore up consumer purchasing power by addressing the loss of income that millions of workers likely will face in the period ahead.
With events involving large numbers of people being canceled and people increasingly avoiding travel, hotels, restaurants, and much more — and with the stock market’s rapid descent — recession looks extremely likely. Indeed, some economists have said that we likely are entering into recession now, and that substantial layoffs and business closures lie ahead. This makes it essential that policymakers act rapidly to take strong fiscal measures to lessen the damage, both to millions of Americans and to the overall economy.
The fiscal policy response should be both aggressive and quick-acting. Since even the fastestacting fiscal stimulus can still take some time to work its way into the economy, policymakers should act very swiftly. There is far more danger in doing too little, too late than too much, too soon.
Among the key sets of measures to institute are measures that can get resources into the hands of tens of millions of low and middle-income households, many of whom will be hit financially by the economic fallout of the pandemic. Doing that is one of the most effective and efficient ways to bolster the economy, as these households spend virtually all income they receive. But it’s only one of a number of steps that should be taken.”
Continue reading here.
From an article by Chye-Ching Huang and Chad Stone (both at Center on Budget and Policy Priorities):
“The COVID-19 pandemic demands an aggressive direct public health response to contain and treat the virus and strengthen health system capacity. Once policymakers enact legislation that House leaders are now negotiating with the Administration, Congress should move quickly to take further bold steps to achieve the dual and related aims of lessening the threat of a major recession and cushioning the financial blow for millions of Americans,
Posted by at 6:54 PM
Labels: Inclusive Growth
Friday, March 13, 2020
On cross-country:
On the US:
On other countries:
On cross-country:
On the US:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, March 6, 2020
A new IMF working paper by Alexei Kireyev and Andrei Leonidov;
“Inclusive growth, narrowly defined in this paper as growth that helps reduce inequality, is achieved if consumption of the poor increases faster than consumption of the rich. The paper presents a simple accounting framework for a per-percentile consumption diagnostics that could inform redistribution policies. The proposed framework is illustrated in application to Iraq and Tunisia.”
A new IMF working paper by Alexei Kireyev and Andrei Leonidov;
“Inclusive growth, narrowly defined in this paper as growth that helps reduce inequality, is achieved if consumption of the poor increases faster than consumption of the rich. The paper presents a simple accounting framework for a per-percentile consumption diagnostics that could inform redistribution policies. The proposed framework is illustrated in application to Iraq and Tunisia.”
Posted by at 4:52 PM
Labels: Inclusive Growth
On cross-country:
On the US:
On other countries:
On cross-country:
On the US:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Thursday, March 5, 2020
From the IMF’s latest report on Australia:
“The fast increase in housing prices since mid-2019 has partly undone earlier price declines. As such, despite lower mortgage rates, there has only been a limited improvement in housing affordability for many households since the peak in housing prices in 2017.
Staff’s Views
Housing supply reforms are critical for restoring affordability. More efficient long-term planning, zoning, and local government reforms that promote housing supply growth, along with a focus on infrastructure development, remain critical to meet the needs of a growing urban population. Initiatives such as “City and Regional Deals” that aim to integrate transport, housing and land use polices to create the opportunity for coordinated action to maximize the value of infrastructure investment, should help meet growing demand for housing.
Broader tax reforms could reinforce the effectiveness of supply-side measures. Transitioning from a housing transfer stamp duty to a general land tax would improve efficiency by easing entry into the housing market and promoting labor mobility, while providing a more stable revenue source for the states. Such reforms could be complemented by reducing structural incentives for leveraged investment by households, including limiting negative gearing in residential real estate. Nonetheless, major changes affecting investment decisions and underlying demand for housing should be gradual, and such reforms should not be undertaken in isolation. In addition, housing policy measures discriminating against nonresidential buyers, such as state-level foreign purchaser duty surcharges on residential property, should be replaced by alternative, non-discriminatory measures, such as a general surcharge on vacant property or surcharges on all investor-owned housing transactions.
Authorities’ Views
The authorities saw potential risks linked to a possible reemergence of rapid housing price growth. With population growth projected to remain strong, the ongoing weakness in building approvals following the past decline in housing prices and tighter credit supply for developers could result in a shortage of new housing and renewed rapid housing price growth, with the risk that this would, in turn, lead to stronger growth in household debt.
The authorities stressed that they would continue to facilitate housing supply reforms and other measures to improve housing affordability. They highlighted that the Commonwealth government provides annual housing-related funding such as rental subsidy for individuals through the Commonwealth Rent Assistance (CRA), funding to states and territories to improve Australians’ access to affordable housing through the National Housing and Homelessness Agreement (NHHA), and the First Home Loan Deposit Scheme to provide loan guarantee to lenders for first-time home buyers. Housing has also been a priority in the City and Regional Deals. The authorities thought that tax policy was not the right tool to address potential speculative behavior in housing markets, as negative gearing applies across investments and investments in residential housing are relatively highly taxed, and that macroprudential policy should instead be employed as needed.”
From the IMF’s latest report on Australia:
“The fast increase in housing prices since mid-2019 has partly undone earlier price declines. As such, despite lower mortgage rates, there has only been a limited improvement in housing affordability for many households since the peak in housing prices in 2017.
Staff’s Views
Housing supply reforms are critical for restoring affordability. More efficient long-term planning, zoning, and local government reforms that promote housing supply growth,
Posted by at 5:39 PM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Subscribe to: Posts