Friday, June 27, 2025
From a book chapter by Ted Schrecker and Clare Bambra:
“‘The inequality machine is reshaping the planet’, wrote the editor of Le Monde Diplomatique in 2013. Rising inequality of income and wealth is one of the distinguishing characteristics of the neoliberal era; we provide descriptions first on a global scale and then on the national, noting the role of labour market transformations and the financial crisis. Poverty is a manifestation of inequality with especially negative consequences for health; we examine trends in the UK and the US, and contrast them with the simultaneous increases in wealth accumulation. We then provide three more focussed case examples: spatial inequalities in health in England; incarceration in the US; and unequal distribution of risks and benefits from the activities that generate climate change. We conclude with a review of evidence that economic inequality makes life worse for almost everyone in the societies affected, not just those at its sharp end.”
From a book chapter by Ted Schrecker and Clare Bambra:
“‘The inequality machine is reshaping the planet’, wrote the editor of Le Monde Diplomatique in 2013. Rising inequality of income and wealth is one of the distinguishing characteristics of the neoliberal era; we provide descriptions first on a global scale and then on the national, noting the role of labour market transformations and the financial crisis. Poverty is a manifestation of inequality with especially negative consequences for health;
Posted by 9:32 AM
atLabels: Inclusive Growth
From a paper by Charlotte Liotta and Jeroen van den Bergh:
“The long-standing growth-versus-environment debate has centered on national and global scales, devoting little attention to cities despite steadily increasing urban concentrations of population, activities and emissions. This Perspective clarifies how this debate plays out for cities by relating four urban growth dimensions—economic, population, spatial and environmental—to the narratives of green growth, degrowth and post-growth. To this end, we review theoretical and empirical insights about links between growth dimensions. Specific issues addressed include horizontal spillovers among cities, vertical policy integration and local experiments. Thus we connect the abstract growth-versus-environment debate to evidence regarding urban environmental policy.”
From a paper by Charlotte Liotta and Jeroen van den Bergh:
“The long-standing growth-versus-environment debate has centered on national and global scales, devoting little attention to cities despite steadily increasing urban concentrations of population, activities and emissions. This Perspective clarifies how this debate plays out for cities by relating four urban growth dimensions—economic, population, spatial and environmental—to the narratives of green growth, degrowth and post-growth. To this end, we review theoretical and empirical insights about links between growth dimensions.
Posted by 9:30 AM
atLabels: Energy & Climate Change
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
On sales, permits, starts, and supply:
On other developments:
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
Posted by 5:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Sunday, June 22, 2025
From a paper by Boyang Lia, Runze Chena, and Yuqin Dua:
“The power generation mix in China heavily relies on fossil energy sources, impeding
the advancement of clean power generation and emission reduction efforts. This paper
presents a macroeconomic model incorporating Emissions Trading Systems (ETS),
clean energy subsidies, and intertemporal learning behavior. It examines how carbon
pricing and clean subsidy policies influence the power generation sector and emission
reduction goals. The findings indicate that (1) pricing strategies based on total
emissions effectively drive emission reductions but may not adequately incentivize
cleaner energy transitions. (2) Increasing clean energy subsidies encourages a shift
towards cleaner technologies, although the impact on emission reductions is moderate.
(3) Combining both policies proves to be more effective than implementing either one
alone. (4) There exists a gap in understanding the clean power generation industry, with
both policies contributing to knowledge accumulation in this sector. The insights from
this study are valuable for countries employing ETS mechanisms.”
From a paper by Boyang Lia, Runze Chena, and Yuqin Dua:
“The power generation mix in China heavily relies on fossil energy sources, impeding
the advancement of clean power generation and emission reduction efforts. This paper
presents a macroeconomic model incorporating Emissions Trading Systems (ETS),
clean energy subsidies, and intertemporal learning behavior. It examines how carbon
pricing and clean subsidy policies influence the power generation sector and emission
reduction goals.
Posted by 8:35 AM
atLabels: Energy & Climate Change
From a paper by Christos A. Makridis and Saurabh Mishra:
“The share of artificial intelligence (AI) jobs in total job postings has increased from 0.20% to nearly 1% between 2010 and 2019, but there is significant heterogeneity across cities in the United States (US). Using new data on AI job postings across 343 US cities, combined with data on subjective well-being and economic activity, we uncover the central role that service-based cities play to translate the benefits of AI job growth to subjective well-being. We find that cities with higher growth in AI job postings witnessed higher economic growth. The relationship between AI job growth and economic growth is driven by cities that had a higher concentration of modern (or professional) services. AI job growth also leads to an increase in the state of well-being. The transmission channel of AI job growth to increased subjective well-being is explained by the positive relationship between AI jobs and economic growth. These results are consistent with models of structural transformation where technological change leads to improvements in well-being through improvements in economic activity. Our results suggest that AI-driven economic growth, while still in the early days, could also raise overall well-being and social welfare, especially when the pre-existing industrial structure had a higher concentration of modern (or professional) services.”
From a paper by Christos A. Makridis and Saurabh Mishra:
“The share of artificial intelligence (AI) jobs in total job postings has increased from 0.20% to nearly 1% between 2010 and 2019, but there is significant heterogeneity across cities in the United States (US). Using new data on AI job postings across 343 US cities, combined with data on subjective well-being and economic activity, we uncover the central role that service-based cities play to translate the benefits of AI job growth to subjective well-being.
Posted by 8:33 AM
atLabels: Uncategorized
Subscribe to: Posts