Monday, February 16, 2026
From a paper by Kardelen Cicek, Julieth Pico Mejía, Marcos Poplawski-Ribeiro, Alberto Tumino:
“This paper analyzes the redistributive effects of inflation across 18 European economies from
2021:Q3 to 2022:Q2, using unique micro-datasets for this country sample. We estimate inflation’s impact on household welfare through the consumption basket, income, and wealth channels. Our main contribution is incorporating real assets into the wealth channel and accounting for behavioral responses to inflation in both the income and wealth channels. These factors significantly alter inflation’s distributional effects compared to previous literature. The inflation shock is estimated to have caused an average welfare loss equivalent to 18.5 percent of annual household income across our sample, with households in the poorest income quintiles suffering the largest losses. Cross-country differences also widen when real assets are incorporated, with a few economies even showing welfare gains for some or all quintiles because house prices rose faster than inflation.”
From a paper by Kardelen Cicek, Julieth Pico Mejía, Marcos Poplawski-Ribeiro, Alberto Tumino:
“This paper analyzes the redistributive effects of inflation across 18 European economies from
2021:Q3 to 2022:Q2, using unique micro-datasets for this country sample. We estimate inflation’s impact on household welfare through the consumption basket, income, and wealth channels. Our main contribution is incorporating real assets into the wealth channel and accounting for behavioral responses to inflation in both the income and wealth channels.
Posted by at 11:11 AM
Labels: Inclusive Growth
From a paper by Claus Brand, Gavin Goy, and Wolfgang Lemke:
“Using a novel macro-finance model we infer jointly the equilibrium real interest rate r*, trend inflation, interest rate expectations, and bond risk premia for the United States. In the model r* plays a dual macro-finance role: as the benchmark real interest rate that closes the output gap and as the time-varying long-run real interest rate that determines the level of the yield curve. Our estimated r* declines over the last decade, with estimation uncertainty being relatively contained. We show that both macro and financial information is important to infer r*. Accounting for the secular decline in interest rates renders term premia more stable than those based on stationary yield curve models.”
From a paper by Claus Brand, Gavin Goy, and Wolfgang Lemke:
“Using a novel macro-finance model we infer jointly the equilibrium real interest rate r*, trend inflation, interest rate expectations, and bond risk premia for the United States. In the model r* plays a dual macro-finance role: as the benchmark real interest rate that closes the output gap and as the time-varying long-run real interest rate that determines the level of the yield curve.
Posted by at 11:09 AM
Labels: Inclusive Growth
Saturday, February 14, 2026
On cross-country:
Working papers and conferences:
On Australia and New Zealand:
On other countries:
On cross-country:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, February 13, 2026
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
On sales, permits, starts, and supply:
On other developments:
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Tuesday, February 10, 2026
From a paper by Guivis Zeufack Nkemgha, Le Roi Nso Fils, and Ulrich Kevin Kamwa:
“This paper examines the impact of trade liberalisation on income inequality across 24 Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries from 2000 to 2020. Using IV-Tobit and 2SLS models, we consistently find that greater trade openness significantly exacerbates inequality in the region. Critically, we document an inverted U-shaped relationship between trade and inequality—similar to the Laffer Curve—but this mitigating effect is only observed in high-income, less corrupt, and democratic SSA countries. In addition, trade openness demonstrates a dual, contradictory effect on inequality: the disruptive impact on employment significantly outweighs the mitigating effect of the education channel. This disparity underscores that without robust labour market and social protection policies, the negative employment consequences of trade liberalisation will dominate the potential equalising gains from human capital development.”
From a paper by Guivis Zeufack Nkemgha, Le Roi Nso Fils, and Ulrich Kevin Kamwa:
“This paper examines the impact of trade liberalisation on income inequality across 24 Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries from 2000 to 2020. Using IV-Tobit and 2SLS models, we consistently find that greater trade openness significantly exacerbates inequality in the region. Critically, we document an inverted U-shaped relationship between trade and inequality—similar to the Laffer Curve—but this mitigating effect is only observed in high-income,
Posted by at 3:39 PM
Labels: Inclusive Growth
Subscribe to: Posts