Tuesday, April 22, 2025
From a paper by Mahdi Shahrazi, Saman Ghaderi & Bahram Sanginabadi:
“The potential influence of global commodity prices on consumer price inflation has been a concern of researchers and policymakers for decades. Even though a body of literature has investigated such connections, the results are mixed. This study uses a structural vector autoregressive (SVAR) model to investigate the impact of global commodity prices on Iran’s inflation over the 2009:1-2018:11 period. We have included commodity price, exchange rate, and stock returns as explanatory variables in our model. Based on the findings of our long-run multiplier matrix the response of inflation to the commodity price shocks is positive and statistically significant. In other words, global commodity prices increase Iranian inflation. Also, the results suggest that the explanatory power of commodity price shocks in inflation fluctuations is higher than those of exchange rate and stock returns in the long run.”
From a paper by Mahdi Shahrazi, Saman Ghaderi & Bahram Sanginabadi:
“The potential influence of global commodity prices on consumer price inflation has been a concern of researchers and policymakers for decades. Even though a body of literature has investigated such connections, the results are mixed. This study uses a structural vector autoregressive (SVAR) model to investigate the impact of global commodity prices on Iran’s inflation over the 2009:1-2018:11 period.
Posted by 4:21 PM
atLabels: Uncategorized
From a paper by Danijela Lazović Vuković, and Jože P. Damijan:
“This paper studies the drivers of rising income inequality in OECD countries between 1980 and 2018. By testing Milanovic’s TOP hypothesis in our sample, we measure the extent to which these distributional outcomes have been driven by either technological progress or globalization and the extent to which they have been influenced or mitigated by policy choices. The results of our empirical analysis provide the basis for confirming the TOP hypothesis. We find evidence that a 10 percent increase in trade openness, financial globalization, and technological progress is on average associated with a 0.4 percent, 0.3 percent, and 0.9 percent change in market inequality, respectively. At the same time, policies such as public expenditure on education, employment protection legislation and direct income taxes promote a more equal distribution. Our most notable finding, however, is that policies not only have a direct equalizing effect, but also mitigate the effects of globalization and technological progress on income inequality. The results of our study suggest that there are reasonable alternatives to anti-globalization strategies and that redistributive and labor market policies can be tailored to control inequality in the era of globalization and technology.”
From a paper by Danijela Lazović Vuković, and Jože P. Damijan:
“This paper studies the drivers of rising income inequality in OECD countries between 1980 and 2018. By testing Milanovic’s TOP hypothesis in our sample, we measure the extent to which these distributional outcomes have been driven by either technological progress or globalization and the extent to which they have been influenced or mitigated by policy choices. The results of our empirical analysis provide the basis for confirming the TOP hypothesis.
Posted by 4:19 PM
atLabels: Inclusive Growth
Saturday, April 19, 2025
On cross-country:
Working papers and conferences:
On Australia and New Zealand:
On other countries:
On cross-country:
Working papers and conferences:
Posted by 5:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, April 18, 2025
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
On sales, permits, starts, and supply:
On impact of tariffs on housing:
On other developments:
On prices, rent, and mortgage:
Posted by 5:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Wednesday, April 16, 2025
From a paper by Du Zhang and Rundong Chen:
“This article analyzes the impact of global economic uncertainty (GEU) and country-specific economic uncertainty (CSEU) on cross-border capital flows using quarterly data from 31 countries between 1997 and 2022, employing a DFM-SV model. The findings reveal that rising GEU leads to capital inflows, while increasing CSEU results in capital outflows. Macroeconomic variables such as CPI and interest rate spread can moderate the effects of GEU and CSEU on capital flows. Additionally, the equity index mitigates capital outflows driven by higher CSEU. In emerging markets, capital flows are particularly sensitive to macroeconomic factors. The influence of GEU on capital flows is moderated by government spending, stock indices, and the real effective exchange rate (REER). Government spending, import volumes, and stock market volatility exacerbate CSEU-induced capital outflows, while the REER dampens them. These insights deepen our understanding of economic uncertainty’s role in cross-border capital movements, offering valuable implications for market regulators, firms, and investors.”
From a paper by Du Zhang and Rundong Chen:
“This article analyzes the impact of global economic uncertainty (GEU) and country-specific economic uncertainty (CSEU) on cross-border capital flows using quarterly data from 31 countries between 1997 and 2022, employing a DFM-SV model. The findings reveal that rising GEU leads to capital inflows, while increasing CSEU results in capital outflows. Macroeconomic variables such as CPI and interest rate spread can moderate the effects of GEU and CSEU on capital flows.
Posted by 1:31 PM
atLabels: Inclusive Growth
Subscribe to: Posts