The Unassuming Economist

From a paper by Claudio Borio and Matthieu Chavaz:

“Recent and upcoming reviews of monetary policy frameworks have been putting the spotlight on
the evolution of inflation targeting. This article provides context by using a new database of
changes to the inflation targeting frameworks of 26 central banks since 1990. We use the data
to track changes in the frameworks’ flexibility in terms of the specification of the inflation target
and the role of other objectives, ie employment (or output) and financial stability. While the
specification of the numerical targets has become stricter (eg points rather than ranges), greater
flexibility has taken the form of less strict / longer horizons to achieve them and more weight on
other objectives, especially employment/output. These trends are typically more pronounced in
advanced economies and have widened differences with their emerging market peers.”

From a paper by Dong Jin Lee, Joon-Ho Hahm, and C yn-Young Park:

“This paper investigates the relationship between monetary policy and economic inequalities in
the Republic of Korea. We consider both domestic and external monetary conditions in the analysis, allowing us to examine their varied impacts on income and wealth inequalities. Using data from the Household Income and Expenditure Survey and the Korean Labor and Income Panel Study, we find that an expansionary domestic monetary policy shock tends to reduce income inequality, while its effect on net wealth inequality is negligible. Conversely, an expansionary external liquidity shock, as indicated by unanticipated net capital inflows, tends to reduce income inequality but exacerbates net asset inequality. These findings suggest that both domestic monetary policy and external liquidity shocks affect economic inequalities, but through different channels.”

From a paper by João Tovar Jalles, Carola Pessino, and Ana Cristina Calderon:

“Widening income disparities, higher corruption, and increased informality in many emerging market and developing economies (EMDEs)—all with pressing and mounting fiscal problems—have rekindled interest in the empirical analysis of the key factors determining the occurrence of fiscal consolidations. Using discrete choice models, this paper examines the drivers of fiscal consolidation episodes in a sample of 148 EMDEs between 1980 and 2019, with a focus on Latin American and Caribbean countries. Inequality does not seem to drive consolidations—which are more likely during good economic times—while more informality increases the probability of their occurrence and corruption decreases it. In turn, when examining the drivers of successful consolidations, larger income inequality acts as a boost, while informality is a hinderance. In fact, while the size of the public investment multiplier in Latin America and the Caribbean is larger than in other regions, when informality is high, the multiplier effect is reduced to a much lower and insignificant magnitude. Results are robust to several sensitivity and robustness tests.”

From a paper by Olufemi G. Onatunji:

“The growing imperative to attain equitable income distribution has compelled international organizations and the academic community to make a collaborative commitment towards alleviating the escalating income inequality experienced worldwide. While there has been a notable development of interest among scholars regarding the nexus between fiscal policy and income inequality, the empirical scrutiny on the contributing role of fiscal policy and institutional quality remains scant in the literature. The present study complements the existing literature by investigating the tripartite nexus between fiscal policy, institutional quality, and income inequality in SSA, which has received no empirical attention in the literature. This study utilizes an advanced econometric technique, the cross-sectional autoregressive distributed lag (CS-ARDL) approach, which addresses cross-sectional dependency and heterogeneity issues for the panel dataset during 1990–2015. The empirical results demonstrate that economic growth, population growth, and government tax exacerbate income inequality, whereas education, government expenditure, and institutional quality metrics mitigate income inequality in SSA countries in the short and long run. The findings also indicate that the performance of institutional quality settings in SSA is significant for fostering efficient fiscal policy, thus improving equitable income distribution. These findings offer substantial, valuable insights and policy implications for policymakers in SSA, which may inform the design and formulation of sustainable development strategies to achieve equitable income distribution.”

From a paper by Huan Huu Nguyen, Nam Anh Tran Nguyen and Phuong Thao Le Thi:

“This study uses public emotions shown through social media to identify public sentiment toward the current Russia-Ukraine war. Utilizing the development of natural language processing algorithms, this study tests the correlation between the public psychological factor and the fluctuation in financial markets and energy prices during the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war. This study emphasizes the public’s initial response to this event (from 1/2022 to 5/2022). It aims to evaluate the public sentiment on sudden shock instead of taking the incident comprehensively. The study results ascertain the public sentiment index contained from social media as a market indicator. During shock events such as the Russia-Ukraine war, public sentiment intensifies energy and financial asset price fluctuation, indicating that public psychology tends to be influenced by negative news and causes them to act accordingly, resulting in a sell-off in financial and energy markets.”