Wednesday, February 21, 2018
From the IMF’s latest report on Australia:
“After a housing boom over the past 6 years, Australia’s housing market imbalances and the macro-financial impact of their possible resolution have become a concern. House prices in the country’s eight capital cities have increased by 50 percent since early 2012, raising the value of Australian residential property from around 4 to over 5 times gross household disposable income and household debt to around twice the level of that income.
The housing boom has primarily been a regional boom, driven by demand shifts, and amplified by legacy imbalances and a slow supply response. Developments in Sydney and Melbourne have driven national house prices, reflecting shifts in the strength of regional economic activity and population growth since the end of the mining investment boom.
While housing markets may stabilize soon, housing affordability issues will likely remain a concern given prospects for further population growth in the eastern capitals. With such growth, the capitals need to prepare for affordable housing supply in the future, as both short-and long-term price elasticities of supply are low. In the long-term, urbanization, labor mobility, and productivity can be closely linked.
Housing-related policies have begun to address related imbalances and could usefully be complemented by tax reform. Reducing the imbalances requires a multi-pronged approach amid strong demand fundamentals. The combination of more infrastructure investment and recent zoning and planning regulatory reform should contribute to increase the supply of developable land and enable its more efficient use. Prudential policies have increased the resilience of household balance sheets and the banking sector to housing and other shocks. But household debt remains high, and continued prudential policies are important to manage the risks to domestic financial stability. Housing tax reform would support the effectiveness of the overall policy response.”
From the IMF’s latest report on Australia:
“After a housing boom over the past 6 years, Australia’s housing market imbalances and the macro-financial impact of their possible resolution have become a concern. House prices in the country’s eight capital cities have increased by 50 percent since early 2012, raising the value of Australian residential property from around 4 to over 5 times gross household disposable income and household debt to around twice the level of that income.
Posted by 1:32 PM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Monday, February 19, 2018
From the latest IMF report on Korea’s minimum wage:
“The 2018 minimum wage hike is by far the largest increase in real terms since the minimum wage system was established in late 1980s. […] This hike will bring Korea’s minimum wage close to the OECD average.
A hike in the minimum wage could have an impact on multiple fronts. In general, it effects employment, especially youth employment, the overall wage levels in the economy, income distribution, and competitiveness of the firms. These in turn affect economic growth and inflation.” Continue reading here.
From the latest IMF report on Korea’s minimum wage:
“The 2018 minimum wage hike is by far the largest increase in real terms since the minimum wage system was established in late 1980s. […] This hike will bring Korea’s minimum wage close to the OECD average.
A hike in the minimum wage could have an impact on multiple fronts. In general, it effects employment,
Posted by 10:04 PM
atLabels: Inclusive Growth
From the latest IMF report on Korea’s youth unemployment:
“While Korea’s rate of youth unemployment is low in international comparison, it has recently increased. In addition, the share of inactive youth is exceptionally high. These developments are concerning as extensive research has shown long-lasting negative effects for individuals affected and the society and economy as a whole.
This paper discusses the potential drivers behind youth unemployment in Korea, the various measures taken by the authorities and best practices from the literature and other countries. The analysis suggests that various factors have contributed to the current situation, including cyclical, structural and policy variables. In particular, weak consumption, a temporary increase in the youth cohort and expectation and skill mismatches are likely responsible. Moreover, issues with educational quality, a focus on direct job creation and high protection of regular workers and the resulting labor market duality have also contributed.
The Korean government has already made significant and comprehensive efforts to tackle youth employment issues and plans to further expand on them. Based on a growing literature of international experiences and policy evaluations, the government could consider (i) fine-tuning existing measures, (ii) expanding preemptive measures and (iii) addressing general cyclical and structural impediments.”
From the latest IMF report on Korea’s youth unemployment:
“While Korea’s rate of youth unemployment is low in international comparison, it has recently increased. In addition, the share of inactive youth is exceptionally high. These developments are concerning as extensive research has shown long-lasting negative effects for individuals affected and the society and economy as a whole.
This paper discusses the potential drivers behind youth unemployment in Korea,
Posted by 9:36 PM
atLabels: Inclusive Growth
A new IMF report says that “Labor market duality in Korea is a complex issue, which encompasses various types of non-regular workers. Nonetheless, it is particularly prominent among SMEs and in the service sector and disproportionately affects women, the elderly and youth. On a macro level it has likely contributed to increasing inequality, low fertility rates and declining productivity growth. The two main drivers behind duality are various employment protection legislations and large productivity differentials in the product market. A general equilibrium search-and-matching model is applied to model duality and simulate the impact of flexicurity policies. It finds that a well-calibrated introduction of flexicurity could address a number of issues that Korea is facing, such as reducing duality and inequality, and raising productivity and welfare. For this it would be crucial to implement all three pillars to ensure gains are distributed among all individuals.”
A new IMF report says that “Labor market duality in Korea is a complex issue, which encompasses various types of non-regular workers. Nonetheless, it is particularly prominent among SMEs and in the service sector and disproportionately affects women, the elderly and youth. On a macro level it has likely contributed to increasing inequality, low fertility rates and declining productivity growth. The two main drivers behind duality are various employment protection legislations and large productivity differentials in the product market.
Posted by 9:22 PM
atLabels: Inclusive Growth
Friday, February 16, 2018
On cross-country:
On the US:
On other countries:
Photo by Aliis Sinisalu
On cross-country:
On the US:
Posted by 5:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Subscribe to: Posts