Showing posts with label Global Housing Watch.   Show all posts

Bloomberg: There Was No Housing Bubble in 2008 and There Isn’t One Now

From Bloomberg:

“Housing markets are red hot, with prices up more than 18% from November 2020 to November 2021. That’s an acceleration over the previous two years, which saw increases of 4% and 8% each. It’s also a faster rate than the U.S. experienced during the housing boom of the 2000s that preceded the Great Recession.

That comparison is causing some heartburn. “Are we in another housing bubble?” asked Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s. The consensus, shared by Zandi, is that the answer is no — or, at least, that today’s bubble is different and less dangerous than the last one. Lending standards are more strict than they were 15 years ago, for example, which ought to mean that fewer homeowners are at risk of defaulting if prices fall.

CNN, though, found a reason for pessimism in that optimism. “The good news is that few economists believe that the current run-up in housing prices is a bubble that’s about to burst, taking the economy down with it,” Chris Isidore of CNN Business wrote on Oct. 27, 2021 before adding ominously, “The bad news is that practically no one was worried about the housing bubble in 2007, either.”

But there’s another reason for sanguinity about the current housing boom: We may have misunderstood the last one all along.

The economists David Beckworth and Scott Sumner have argued that the timing of the last housing bust does not line up with the conventional wisdom that it played a central role in the recession that began in December 2007. The housing market peaked in early 2006, and sustained nearly two years of decline before the economy stopped growing as unemployment stayed low.

Kevin Erdmann — the author of a new book about housing, “Building from the Ground Up,” and a colleague of Beckworth and Sumner at George Mason University’s Mercatus Center — has more recently challenged the claim that the U.S. built too many houses back then. He points out that spending on housing didn’t grow any faster than spending on other consumption goods during the boom (or the preceding decades). The notion that the price increases of 2000-2007 were unsustainable, he points out, also doesn’t match the experience of other countries. The U.K. had a larger increase, a shorter and less severe decline, and a stronger rebound.

Erdmann does not deny that average home prices rose too much in some metropolitan areas during that period. But these spikes were a function of too little homebuilding, not too much. Prices rose fast in two types of cities: those with tight constraints on supply (including New York and San Francisco) and those that dealt with an influx of newcomers from those places (such as Phoenix and Miami). “

Read the full article here.

From Bloomberg:

“Housing markets are red hot, with prices up more than 18% from November 2020 to November 2021. That’s an acceleration over the previous two years, which saw increases of 4% and 8% each. It’s also a faster rate than the U.S. experienced during the housing boom of the 2000s that preceded the Great Recession.

That comparison is causing some heartburn.

Read the full article…

Posted by at 10:07 AM

Labels: Global Housing Watch

Prime Real Estate Newsletter – January 2022

[embeddoc url=”https://unassumingeconomist.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/PR_2022_01-5.docx”]

[embeddoc url=”https://unassumingeconomist.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/PR_2022_01-5.docx”] Read the full article…

Posted by at 4:12 PM

Labels: Global Housing Watch

Should Blacks Apply for Mortgage Loans at the End of the Month?

A new paper studies mortgage loan approval rates for white and blacks. “In the first seven days of the month, Black applicants have 20 percentage point lower approval rates than white applicants. The approval gap declines to just 10 percentage points on the last day the month,” as shown in the figure below. Why? The authors examine the hypothesis that this occurs because loan officers have monthly volume quotas, which gives “them less scope to apply subjective preferences” at the end of the month. They calculate “an upper bound for the costs of discrimination”: “if the Black approval gap on each day of the month was as small as it was on the last day, approximately 1.4 million more Black applicants would have been approved between 1994 and 2018,” corresponding to over $200 billion in total loan volume.  

The figure reports approval rates, which we define as the fraction of loans that are originated out of the total number of applications (excluding withdrawn applications). We present the difference between the Black approval rate and the white approval rate on each day.

A new paper studies mortgage loan approval rates for white and blacks. “In the first seven days of the month, Black applicants have 20 percentage point lower approval rates than white applicants. The approval gap declines to just 10 percentage points on the last day the month,” as shown in the figure below. Why? The authors examine the hypothesis that this occurs because loan officers have monthly volume quotas, which gives “them less scope to apply subjective preferences” at the end of the month.

Read the full article…

Posted by at 1:02 PM

Labels: Global Housing Watch

Housing View – January 7, 2022

On cross-country:

  • How long can the global housing boom last? Three fundamental forces mean it could endure for some time yet – The Economist

On the US:   

  • ‘There may be a slight correction in pricing.’ Real estate attorneys and economists on what buyers need to know about the housing market in 2022 – Market Watch
  • Home Values in Already Hot U.S. Market to Surge 14% This Year, Zillow Says. Tampa and Jacksonville in Florida and Raleigh in North Carolina are projected to be most in-demand. – Bloomberg
  • Why Tampa will be 2022’s Hottest Market – Zillow
  • Real estate market in 2022 will ‘remain very strong,’ expert says – Yahoo Finance
  • AEI housing market indicators, December 2021 – American Enterprise Institute 
  • Home Ownership More Affordable Than Renting in Majority of U.S. Housing Markets – ATTOM
  • What’s Going on With Housing Prices? A Deep Dive into the Discrepancy Between Home Price Indexes, Private Sector Rental Data, and Official CPI Rent Indexes – Apricitas

On China

  • China Property Tax Trial Likely Delayed During Real Estate Slump – Bloomberg

On other countries:  

  • [Australia] As stimulus wanes, focus on productivity and house prices – Financial Review
  • [Australia] Australia Housing Boom Fades as Melbourne, Sydney Pull Back – Bloomberg
  • [Australia] Australia’s housing market faces headwinds as supply likely to outpace demand, analysts say – South China Morning Post
  • [Ireland] The impact of COVID-19 on house prices in Northern Ireland: price persistence, yet divergent? – Journal of Property Research
  • [New Zealand] New Zealand Average Home Price Exceeds NZ$1 Million for First Time – Bloomberg
  • [Taiwan] Taiwan Central Bank Split on Using Rates to Rein in Housing Market – Bloomberg   

On cross-country:

  • How long can the global housing boom last? Three fundamental forces mean it could endure for some time yet – The Economist

On the US:   

  • ‘There may be a slight correction in pricing.’ Real estate attorneys and economists on what buyers need to know about the housing market in 2022 – Market Watch
  • Home Values in Already Hot U.S.

Read the full article…

Posted by at 5:00 AM

Labels: Global Housing Watch

How long can the global housing boom last?

From The Economist:

The IMF’s global house-price index, expressed in real terms, is well above the peak reached before the 2007-09 financial crisis. American housebuilders’ share prices are up by 44% over the past year, compared with 27% for the overall stockmarket. Estate agents from Halifax’s mom-and-pop shops to the supermodel lookalikes on Netflix’s “Selling Sunset”, in Los Angeles, have never had it so good.

Now people are wondering whether the party is about to end. Governments are winding down stimulus. People no longer have so much spare cash to splurge on property, now that foreign holidays are back and restaurants are open. Central banks, worried about surging inflation, are tightening monetary policy, including by raising interest rates. In its latest financial-stability report the IMF warned that “downside risks to house prices appear to be significant”, and that, if these were to materialise, prices in rich countries could fall by up to 14%. In New Zealand, where prices have risen by 24% in the past year, the central bank is blunter. The “level of house prices”, it says, is “unsustainable”.

But is it? (…)

Fundamental forces may once again explain why house prices today are so high—and why they may endure. Three reasons stand out: robust household balance-sheets; people’s greater willingness to spend more on their living arrangements; and the severity of supply constraints.”

From The Economist:

“The IMF’s global house-price index, expressed in real terms, is well above the peak reached before the 2007-09 financial crisis. American housebuilders’ share prices are up by 44% over the past year, compared with 27% for the overall stockmarket. Estate agents from Halifax’s mom-and-pop shops to the supermodel lookalikes on Netflix’s “Selling Sunset”, in Los Angeles, have never had it so good.

Now people are wondering whether the party is about to end.

Read the full article…

Posted by at 8:11 PM

Labels: Global Housing Watch

Newer Posts Home Older Posts

Subscribe to: Posts