Showing posts with label Global Housing Watch. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 16, 2022
From the IMF’s latest report on Spain:
“Continued efforts to address housing affordability challenges would support growth, facilitate labor mobility across regions and reduce inequality. Prior to the pandemic, limited rental housing supply hampered by relatively inefficient building regulations contributed to a surge in rental prices, creating affordability problems and limiting labor mobility (especially for young people and other vulnerable groups). The draft housing law and the national housing plan aim to address the existing challenges. To limit increases in rent prices in stressed areas, the law introduces rent caps on large landlords and tax incentives for small landlords to keep rents low. While these may benefit tenants in the short term, rent caps could introduce inefficiencies and restrict the availability of properties for future tenants. Further evaluation of these measures would be useful to gauge their impact. The envisaged targeted rent support programs for vulnerable groups are welcome. However, they should be combined with effective supply measures to avoid further pressures on rent prices. The increase of taxes on empty properties and the expansion of the social housing stock, which are contemplated in the proposed reform, should help increase rent supply. The RTRP envisages €1 billion for the construction of new public social rental dwellings in 2022–23. Additional policies to increase housing supply could include simplifying land use regulations and accelerating licensing processes at the regional government level.”
From the IMF’s latest report on Spain:
“Continued efforts to address housing affordability challenges would support growth, facilitate labor mobility across regions and reduce inequality. Prior to the pandemic, limited rental housing supply hampered by relatively inefficient building regulations contributed to a surge in rental prices, creating affordability problems and limiting labor mobility (especially for young people and other vulnerable groups). The draft housing law and the national housing plan aim to address the existing challenges.
Posted by 11:44 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Saturday, February 12, 2022
From European Systemic Risk Board:
“In this report, the ESRB presents its medium-term assessment of vulnerabilities relating to the RRE sector across the EEA countries. In carrying out this assessment, the ESRB first performed an analysis of vulnerabilities across the EEA countries. For the 24 countries for which the vulnerabilities identified were more pronounced, an in-depth analysis was conducted. This analysis pointed also to the need to take into account or change other than macroprudential policies, for example by changing tax incentives or increasing the housing supply. A similar assessment was conducted by the ESRB in 2019, when 11 countries received either ESRB recommendations (Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Luxembourg, Netherlands and Sweden) or warnings (Czech Republic, Germany, France, Iceland and Norway).
The risk assessment concluded that, in five countries which received ESRB recommendations or warnings in 2019 (Denmark, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway and Sweden) the vulnerabilities relating to residential real estate markets remained high, while in six countries (Belgium, Czech Republic, Germany, Finland, France and Iceland) the vulnerabilities were assessed as medium. Among other EEA countries, 13 (Austria, Bulgaria, Estonia, Croatia, Hungary, Ireland, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia and Slovakia) were identified as facing medium risks.
The policy assessment found that in five countries which received ESRB recommendations or warnings in 2019 (Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Iceland and Norway), policies were assessed as appropriate and sufficient to mitigate the vulnerabilities identified. In two countries (the Netherlands and Sweden), policies were assessed as being appropriate but partially sufficient, while in four of the countries (Germany, Denmark, Finland and Luxembourg), policies were assessed as partially appropriate and partially sufficient. Among the rest of the EEA countries analysed in this report, in one country (Slovakia) policies were identified as appropriate and partially sufficient, while in five countries (Austria, Bulgaria, Hungary, Croatia and Liechtenstein) policies were found to be partially appropriate and partially sufficient.
In countries in which the policies were assessed as only partially sufficient to mitigate the identified vulnerabilities, the ESRB suggested various macroprudential measures to be considered by the national authorities. In particular, the ESRB pointed out that a number of countries should either introduce additional borrower-based measures or tighten existing ones to mitigate the existing vulnerabilities more effectively or prevent a further build-up of vulnerabilities. Countries with accumulated vulnerabilities should also ensure that capital is preserved until a possible materialisation of risks or consider (re)introducing capital-based measures once the economic recovery is on a firm footing. However, taking into account the economic uncertainty related to the pandemic, any policy actions should be carefully assessed to ensure that they contribute towards mitigating RRE vulnerabilities, while aiming to avoid procyclical effects on the real economy and the financial system. In the near term, it is particularly important for all countries that banks make adequate provision for expected losses. Finally, the analysis notes that, in some countries in which the systemic risk levels identified remain high, interventions in other policy areas may be required to complement macroprudential policy.”
From European Systemic Risk Board:
“In this report, the ESRB presents its medium-term assessment of vulnerabilities relating to the RRE sector across the EEA countries. In carrying out this assessment, the ESRB first performed an analysis of vulnerabilities across the EEA countries. For the 24 countries for which the vulnerabilities identified were more pronounced, an in-depth analysis was conducted. This analysis pointed also to the need to take into account or change other than macroprudential policies,
Posted by 6:29 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, February 11, 2022
On cross-country:
On the US:
On China
On other countries:
On cross-country:
On the US:
Posted by 5:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Tuesday, February 8, 2022
From a new paper by Monica Langella and Alan Manning:
“The UK has suffered from persistent spatial differences in unemployment rates for many decades. A low responsiveness of internal migration to unemployment is often argued to be an important cause of this problem. This paper uses UK census data to investigate how unemployment affects residential mobility using small areas as potential destinations and origins and four decades of data. It finds that both in- and out-migration are affected by local unemployment – but also that there is a very high ‘cost of distance’, so most moves are very local. We complement the study with individual longitudinal data to analyse individual heterogeneities in mobility. We show that elasticities to local unemployment are different across people with different characteristics. For instance, people who are better educated are more sensitive, the same applies to homeowners. Ethnic minorities are on average less sensitive to local unemployment rates and tend to end up in higher unemployment areas when moving.”
From a new paper by Monica Langella and Alan Manning:
“The UK has suffered from persistent spatial differences in unemployment rates for many decades. A low responsiveness of internal migration to unemployment is often argued to be an important cause of this problem. This paper uses UK census data to investigate how unemployment affects residential mobility using small areas as potential destinations and origins and four decades of data. It finds that both in- and out-migration are affected by local unemployment –
Posted by 11:13 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, February 4, 2022
On cross-country:
On the US:
On China
On other countries:
On cross-country:
Posted by 5:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Subscribe to: Posts