Showing posts with label Global Housing Watch. Show all posts
Sunday, December 17, 2017
The IMF’s latest report on Finland says that:
“House prices do not show signs of overvaluation. House prices relative to rent and incomes are close to their long run averages. Real house prices in the Helsinki metropolitan area have increased gradually since 2012, reflecting greater demand, whereas they have declined for the rest of Finland.
Some households are vulnerable (…). Household saving rates are negative, unsecured consumer credit is growing strongly, and a large share of mortgage loans is held by highly indebted borrowers: over a quarter of mortgage debt is to mortgagees with debt to income ratios higher than 400 percent. Some households would therefore be vulnerable to interest rate increases, as most mortgages are variable rate loans (although about 40 percent of mortgages have contracts that lengthening loan maturity instead of increasing payments).
Increasing imbalances in the household sector make it important to give the FIN-FSA additional tools:
Additional macroprudential measures for borrowers should be introduced to allow the macroprudential authority to better target household vulnerabilities that are not well covered by existing Loan-To-Collateral limits. These could include caps on loans in relation to values of houses and personal incomes, and debt servicing to income. The Bank of Finland and FIN-FSA are currently working together to analyze appropriateness of different tools, and plans to propose legislation for additional measures once the SRB is introduced.
A comprehensive credit registry would be particularly helpful to monitor and assess household credit. The Ministry of Justice has ordered a study on its implementation in Finland.”
The IMF’s latest report on Finland says that:
“House prices do not show signs of overvaluation. House prices relative to rent and incomes are close to their long run averages. Real house prices in the Helsinki metropolitan area have increased gradually since 2012, reflecting greater demand, whereas they have declined for the rest of Finland.
Some households are vulnerable (…). Household saving rates are negative, unsecured consumer credit is growing strongly,
Posted by at 4:33 PM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, December 15, 2017
On cross-country:
On the US:
On other countries:
Photo by Aliis Sinisalu
On cross-country:
On the US:
Posted by at 9:06 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Friday, December 8, 2017
2018 Housing Forecasts collected by Bill McBride:
Posted by at 8:09 PM
Labels: Forecasting Forum, Global Housing Watch
On cross-country:
On the US:
On other countries:
Photo by Aliis Sinisalu
On cross-country:
On the US:
Posted by at 5:00 AM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Thursday, December 7, 2017
From the IMF’s latest report on China:
“The counter-cyclical capital buffer (CCyB) is an important macroprudential instrument. The FSS-C could review this regularly, and make proposals for its activation. Activation/adjustment should also be considered jointly with measures to further rein in shadow banking, and possible increases in capital requirements for other reasons (Box 6).
The PBC’s macroprudential assessment (MPA) has been a useful monitoring tool but its purpose and structure would now benefit from review. The MPA monitors seven categories of financial stability indicators (recently broadened to cover off-balance sheet credit expansion) on a bank-by-bank basis, some of which are key macroprudential indicators. Assessments under MPA, such as compliance with interest rate or credit policy, involve some PBC discretion, as do the administrative penalties applied informally to banks failing the MPA. Currently the MPA is used to determine access to PBC facilities and remuneration of reserves, rather than being tailored to address systemic risk. MPA results should not determine access to PBC facilities. Moreover, the purpose of the MPA should be reviewed and clarified, its structure simplified, and the methodology published. To ensure close interagency coordination, any macroprudential action recommended on the basis of the MPA should be discussed by the proposed FSS-C, for action by individual regulators.
Tighter liquidity requirements are warranted on macroprudential grounds. At the entity level, negotiable certificates of deposit have recently been included in the limit on interbank liabilities. However, the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) should also be extended to smaller banks, and at the product level, rules on asset allocation and redemption should be tightened, and valuation rules should be revised.
Data gaps, including insufficient interagency information sharing, should be addressed. Collection of loan-book related data by the CBRC appears to be strong, but supervisory access to data has not kept pace as risks have migrated to investment books and off-balance sheet products. Priorities are (i) better granular data on banks’ investments and interbank exposures; (ii) empowering the FSS-C to require institutions, including nonfinancial institutions that provide financial services, to report data related to financial stability; and (iii) adopting common accounting standards across financial institutions to facilitate monitoring risks. Ongoing plans to develop a joint regulatory financial data platform should be prioritized. The quality and scope of the credit registry system should be strengthened by capturing individual indebtedness to nonbanks (such as P2P). Fuller coverage and centralization of property market indicators across all regions is desirable.
Property market risks have risen, while the tools for managing them are predominantly local. Homebuyers are more leveraged than during the last episode of rising market risk, and the rising share of high-LTV mortgages is a concern. Refinements to the calibration of housing market measures—such as the use of stressed interest rate assumptions in debt-service-to-income limits—would be useful.
Property market policies that are decentralized and implemented at the municipal level should be standardized. While measures are enacted in consultation with local branches of the PBC, CBRC, and other relevant authorities, local governments’ GDP growth targets and social stability and fiscal objectives may prevent timely tightening or lead to premature relaxation of some measures. There are sound reasons for local government involvement in these decisions. But local-level committees, involving local governments and local PBC and CBRC offices, should be formalized and meetings held regularly, using risk analysis provided by the PBC, to help ensure comparable treatment across cities and reduce the scope for belated tightening or premature relaxation.”
From the IMF’s latest report on China:
“The counter-cyclical capital buffer (CCyB) is an important macroprudential instrument. The FSS-C could review this regularly, and make proposals for its activation. Activation/adjustment should also be considered jointly with measures to further rein in shadow banking, and possible increases in capital requirements for other reasons (Box 6).
The PBC’s macroprudential assessment (MPA) has been a useful monitoring tool but its purpose and structure would now benefit from review.
Posted by at 1:30 PM
Labels: Global Housing Watch
Subscribe to: Posts