Showing posts with label Global Housing Watch.   Show all posts

2018 Housing Forecasts

2018 Housing Forecasts collected by Bill McBride:

Capture11

Posted by at 8:09 PM

Labels: Forecasting Forum, Global Housing Watch

Housing View – December 8, 2017

On cross-country:

On the US:

On other countries:

  • [Australia] Aussie states to encourage ‘built-to-rent’ housing projects – Global Property Guide
  • [Canada] The Housing Supply Myth – Kwantlen Polytechnic University
  • [Canada] Mortgage and consumer credit trends – CMHC
  • [China] Hidden peril awaits China’s banks as property binge fuels mortgage fraud frenzy – Reuters
  • Housing Challenges in Chinese Cities Under Urbanization – Urbanization and Urban Governance in China
  • [Denmark] A regional model of the Danish housing market – Danmarks Nationalbank
  • [France] French housing market heating up led by Paris – Reuters
  • [India] Affordable housing is a no-brainer for India’s bulls – Financial Times
  • [Ireland] The roots of Ireland’s property crisis – Economist
  • [Sweden] Swedish construction firms see no major fall in housing demand ahead- c.bank survey – Reuters
  • [United Arab Emirates] Dubai, Property Market Outlook, Winter 2017 – Cluttons
  • [United Kingdom] London’s property market is rescued by its former colony, Hong Kong – Economist
  • [United Kingdom] UK stamp duty cut for first-time buyers raises concerns – Global Property Guide

 

aliis-sinisalu-70432

Photo by Aliis Sinisalu

 

On cross-country:

On the US:

Read the full article…

Posted by at 5:00 AM

Labels: Global Housing Watch

Macroprudential Policy in China’s Real Estate Market

From the IMF’s latest report on China:

“The counter-cyclical capital buffer (CCyB) is an important macroprudential instrument. The FSS-C could review this regularly, and make proposals for its activation. Activation/adjustment should also be considered jointly with measures to further rein in shadow banking, and possible increases in capital requirements for other reasons (Box 6).

The PBC’s macroprudential assessment (MPA) has been a useful monitoring tool but its purpose and structure would now benefit from review. The MPA monitors seven categories of financial stability indicators (recently broadened to cover off-balance sheet credit expansion) on a bank-by-bank basis, some of which are key macroprudential indicators. Assessments under MPA, such as compliance with interest rate or credit policy, involve some PBC discretion, as do the administrative penalties applied informally to banks failing the MPA. Currently the MPA is used to determine access to PBC facilities and remuneration of reserves, rather than being tailored to address systemic risk. MPA results should not determine access to PBC facilities. Moreover, the purpose of the MPA should be reviewed and clarified, its structure simplified, and the methodology published. To ensure close interagency coordination, any macroprudential action recommended on the basis of the MPA should be discussed by the proposed FSS-C, for action by individual regulators.

Tighter liquidity requirements are warranted on macroprudential grounds. At the entity level, negotiable certificates of deposit have recently been included in the limit on interbank liabilities. However, the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) should also be extended to smaller banks, and at the product level, rules on asset allocation and redemption should be tightened, and valuation rules should be revised.

Data gaps, including insufficient interagency information sharing, should be addressed. Collection of loan-book related data by the CBRC appears to be strong, but supervisory access to data has not kept pace as risks have migrated to investment books and off-balance sheet products. Priorities are (i) better granular data on banks’ investments and interbank exposures; (ii) empowering the FSS-C to require institutions, including nonfinancial institutions that provide financial services, to report data related to financial stability; and (iii) adopting common accounting standards across financial institutions to facilitate monitoring risks. Ongoing plans to develop a joint regulatory financial data platform should be prioritized. The quality and scope of the credit registry system should be strengthened by capturing individual indebtedness to nonbanks (such as P2P). Fuller coverage and centralization of property market indicators across all regions is desirable.

Property market risks have risen, while the tools for managing them are predominantly local. Homebuyers are more leveraged than during the last episode of rising market risk, and the rising share of high-LTV mortgages is a concern. Refinements to the calibration of housing market measures—such as the use of stressed interest rate assumptions in debt-service-to-income limits—would be useful.

Property market policies that are decentralized and implemented at the municipal level should be standardized. While measures are enacted in consultation with local branches of the PBC, CBRC, and other relevant authorities, local governments’ GDP growth targets and social stability and fiscal objectives may prevent timely tightening or lead to premature relaxation of some measures. There are sound reasons for local government involvement in these decisions. But local-level committees, involving local governments and local PBC and CBRC offices, should be formalized and meetings held regularly, using risk analysis provided by the PBC, to help ensure comparable treatment across cities and reduce the scope for belated tightening or premature relaxation.”

From the IMF’s latest report on China:

“The counter-cyclical capital buffer (CCyB) is an important macroprudential instrument. The FSS-C could review this regularly, and make proposals for its activation. Activation/adjustment should also be considered jointly with measures to further rein in shadow banking, and possible increases in capital requirements for other reasons (Box 6).

The PBC’s macroprudential assessment (MPA) has been a useful monitoring tool but its purpose and structure would now benefit from review.

Read the full article…

Posted by at 1:30 PM

Labels: Global Housing Watch

Housing in the Maldives

The IMF’s new report on the Maldives says that: “Careful monitoring is warranted, supported by prudential measures on housing. Private sector credit has grown rapidly, led by the housing and construction sector. Banks’ credit to the private sector has continued to grow, driven by lower NPLs and an accommodative monetary policy stance since 2015. Banks require 150 percent of collateral on loans extended and a 20–25 percent down payment as insurance against default risk, which households can meet by drawing on their pension assets. In the context of a sharp increase in housing-related loans and exposure of the Maldives Pension Administration Office (MPAO), careful monitoring is recommended.”

The IMF’s new report on the Maldives says that: “Careful monitoring is warranted, supported by prudential measures on housing. Private sector credit has grown rapidly, led by the housing and construction sector. Banks’ credit to the private sector has continued to grow, driven by lower NPLs and an accommodative monetary policy stance since 2015. Banks require 150 percent of collateral on loans extended and a 20–25 percent down payment as insurance against default risk,

Read the full article…

Posted by at 5:00 AM

Labels: Global Housing Watch

2017 Year in Review: A Look Back At the Housing Stories

As 2017 comes to an end, below is a brief recap of the topics that the Global Housing Watch newsletter covered this year:

Housing supply: Joseph Gyourko (The Wharton School) talks about how regulations and zoning affects housing supply and affordability. A discussion on housing construction—the current state, policy implication, and the future by Jordan Rappaport (Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City). And Jan Mischke (McKinsey Global Institute) takes a look at productivity in the construction sector.

Housing in Africa: The work done by the Centre for Affordable Housing Finance in Africa (CAHF), and the their latest annual report is discussed by Kecia Rust (CAHF). There is also an overview of the property tax systems of 29 African countries by Riël C. D. Franzsen (African Tax Institute).

Housing across countries: Steve Malpezzi (University of Wisconsin-Madison) discusses housing patterns across countries. Richard Ronald (University of Amsterdam) talks about the globalization of housing markets. Kate Everett-Allen (Knight Frank) provides an update on the current the state of global house prices. And Frank Nothaft (CoreLogic) takes a look at the US housing market.

House price measurement: Niall O’Hanlon (International Monetary Fund) gives an update on the recent progress on house price measurement.

Country specific developments: AustraliaAustria, Belgium, CambodiaChinaColombia, Czech RepublicDenmark, Euro Area, GermanyIcelandIndonesiaIreland, Israel, JapanLithuaniaLuxembourgMacao, MalaysiaMaltaMorocco, Netherlands, New Zealand, NorwayPeru, PhilippinesPoland, PortugalSan Marino, SingaporeSlovak RepublicSpain, St. Kitts and Nevis, SwedenThailandTurkey, United Arab Emirates, and United States.

 

affordable-housing-fee

 

As 2017 comes to an end, below is a brief recap of the topics that the Global Housing Watch newsletter covered this year:

Housing supply: Joseph Gyourko (The Wharton School) talks about how regulations and zoning affects housing supply and affordability. A discussion on housing construction—the current state, policy implication, and the future by Jordan Rappaport (Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City). And Jan Mischke (McKinsey Global Institute) takes a look at productivity in the construction sector.

Read the full article…

Posted by at 5:00 AM

Labels: Global Housing Watch

Newer Posts Home Older Posts

Subscribe to: Posts