Showing posts with label Uncategorized. Show all posts
Thursday, March 17, 2016
Structural transformation depends not only on how much countries export but also on what they export and with whom they trade. In my new IMF working paper with Rahul Anand and Kalpana Kochhar, we break new grounds in analyzing India’s exports by the technological content, quality, sophistication, and complexity of India’s export basket. The paper can be found here. Here are few key pieces of evidence from our paper:
Technological content of India’s exports
The evolution of Indian exports has not followed a “textbook” pattern. The pattern of evolution points to a dichotomy in the Indian economy – a well integrated, technologically advanced services sector and a relatively lagging manufacturing sector. The share of service exports in total exports has grown to over 32 percent in 2013 from 28 percent in 2000. On the other hand, the share of manufacturing exports in total export has declined to 67 percent from nearly 80 percent during 1990-2013.
The growth in service exports has been more rapid, resulting in the share of services exports in total exports to increase rapidly over the last decade. This can be explained by technological changes. Many services do not require face-to-face interaction, and can be stored and traded digitally. These services are called modern services. Modern services are the fastest growing sector of the global economy. This is particularly evident in India, where modern services exports account for nearly 70 percent of the total commercial services exports (compared to around 35 percent in EMs) (see Figure 1).
Within manufacturing exports, there is a clear shift away from traditional exports, such as textiles, gems, and leather products, towards high-tech and medium-tech manufacturing products. The relative share of high-tech manufacturing exports has been increasing (however lower when compared to China or other EMs); Resource based production and low-tech manufacturing dominate the goods export basket (Figure 2).
Manufactured machinery accounts for almost 10 percent, while textile and garments account for more than 15 percent of India’s merchandise exports. In resource-based products – refined petroleum oil, cotton, jewelry of precious metals, and rice – constitute majority of export. In low-tech manufacturing exports – jewelry, textile and apparel based exports constitute the majority of India’s exports. In medium-tech manufacturing – the automotive industry dominates the basket, with machinery, various motor vehicle intermediary inputs for cars, bikes, construction, mining equipment and cosmetics making up the major portion. In the high technology export basket – veterinary and pharmaceutical products, television, telecommunication transistors, aircraft components, X-ray equipment and electronic R&D in electro-medical, power and automotive industry are key elements of the export basket. The main contribution of our work is to comprehensively document Indian exports, which has not been done over the past decade.
Continue reading here.
From Saurabh Mishra:
Structural transformation depends not only on how much countries export but also on what they export and with whom they trade. In my new IMF working paper with Rahul Anand and Kalpana Kochhar, we break new grounds in analyzing India’s exports by the technological content, quality, sophistication, and complexity of India’s export basket. The paper can be found here. Here are few key pieces of evidence from our paper:
Technological content of India’s exports
The evolution of Indian exports has not followed a “textbook” pattern.
Posted by 8:45 PM
atLabels: Uncategorized
Thursday, December 31, 2015
1. Lower unionization associated with increased inequality: IMF F&D
5. On Groundhog Day, Honoring A Forecasting Giant
6. On U.S. Labor Market Slack: Updated Estimates of the Impact of Uncertainty on Unemployment
7. Understanding China’s Housing Market
8. Uncertainty and U.S. Unemployment
Below is a list of the most read blogs of the year:
1. Lower unionization associated with increased inequality: IMF F&D
2. Jobs & Inequality: Special Feature in Finance & Development
3. Fund Fires Employment Guru?
4. India’s Housing Market: What’s happened? What’s next?
5. On Groundhog Day, Honoring A Forecasting Giant
6. On U.S. Labor Market Slack: Updated Estimates of the Impact of Uncertainty on Unemployment
7.
Posted by 12:55 PM
atLabels: Uncategorized
Friday, October 16, 2015
The first panel, “Theory and Evidence of Spillovers,” included presentations by Steven Kamin, (Federal Reserve System); Prakash Loungani (IMF); and Michael Klein (Tufts University).
The second panel on “Policy Implications of Spillovers” featured analyses by Joseph E. Gagnon (PIIE) and Reuven Glick (Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco). Tae Soo Kang (John Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies), discussed their views from his perspective.
The conference concluded with a high-level panel featuring Olivier Blanchard (PIIE); Jose De Gregorio (University of Chile); and Guillermo Mondino (Citi).
The Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE) hosted a conference on “Spillovers of Unconventional Monetary Policy” on October 15. Experts from a wide range of official and private institutions shared their perspectives on the global spillovers of recent policies from the Federal Reserve and other major central banks.
The first panel, “Theory and Evidence of Spillovers,” included presentations by Steven Kamin, (Federal Reserve System); Prakash Loungani (IMF); and Michael Klein (Tufts University).
Posted by 1:03 PM
atLabels: Uncategorized
Friday, July 31, 2015
Analysis in the IMF’s latest Spillover Report suggests the answer is “no”.
Continue reading here.
Though this week’s FOMC statement is still being parsed, market participants generally expect the Federal Reserve to raise policy interest rates this September. In contrast, the European Central Bank has significantly eased monetary policies over the past year and is expected to maintain accommodative policies for a substantial period of time. Should emerging markets fear the consequences of the so-called Fed liftoff and the likely increase in U.S. long-term bond yields?
Analysis in the IMF’s latest Spillover Report suggests the answer is “no”.
Posted by 9:11 PM
atLabels: Uncategorized
Friday, June 8, 2012
By John M. Biers
A big drop in oil prices due to a global economic slowdown constitutes a bigger worry than the relatively high price floor for oil that has prevailed recently period, an International Monetary Fund analyst said in an interview this week.
Oil prices have dropped roughly 20% in recent weeks amid weak jobs data and other economic indicators that have renewed fears of a global slowdown, yet remain high by historical standards, lingering around or above $100 a barrel Brent since January 2011.
In remarks that provided a view of how the IMF sees the oil market, Prakash Loungani said the global economy has adapted to a relatively high oil price floor as long as it isn’t caused by an unexpected supply disruption. But Mr. Loungani said the agency now fears a big drop in prices because it would likely be accompanied by a major global economic slowdown.
“The worry is that the economies are looking soft, both the U.S. and major emerging economies,” said Mr. Loungani, an advisor in the research department of the IMF who handles commodities research.
“We are very worried about the state of the world economy,” Mr. Loungani said in a telephone interview.
Thursday, ICE July North Sea Brent crude was 1.2%, or $1.23, higher at $101.87 a barrel. Light, sweet crude oil for July delivery was up 1.6%, or $1.34 higher, at $86.38 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange.
Mr. Loungani said a relatively high oil price isn’t in itself a huge concern for the economy. The influential Saudi oil minister, Ali al-Naimi, said recently he wants oil prices around $100 a barrel. Other countries in the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries now also look for triple-digit oil prices, leaving the $22-$28 a barrel price band once favored by the cartel as a distant memory.
Mr. Loungani pointed to IMF research that has shown how the world has adapted to relatively high oil prices due to a number of factors. For one, much of the reason for higher oil prices rests on rising demand in emerging economies; in that case, the benefits of strong growth outweigh the negatives of higher oil prices.
Other mitigating factors to high prices include more sophisticated central bank policies that guard against oil-related inflation growth; greater efficiency in the use of energy in the economy; and greater diversification in energy supplies.
“The trends are in the direction of reduced impact” on the economy from higher oil prices, Mr. Loungani said. “The structure of the economy has adjusted.”
However, Mr. Loungani said the global economy can still be harmed by sudden price spikes if they are caused by unexpected supply disruptions, because “the economy still doesn’t have the means to handle that in the short-term.”
Some economists have highlighted the role that higher oil prices played in the global 2007-2008 slowdown related to lower disposable income. At the time, the dominant explanation for the slowdown concerned the bursting of the U.S. housing bubble and the ensuing financial crisis.
Mr. Loungani said he has been persuaded that “oil prices may have played a role” in that slowdown, but he said the current weakness relates more to lingering financial weakness and the ongoing euro zone crisis.
Write to John Biers at john.biers@dowjones.com
By John M. Biers
A big drop in oil prices due to a global economic slowdown constitutes a bigger worry than the relatively high price floor for oil that has prevailed recently period, an International Monetary Fund analyst said in an interview this week.
Oil prices have dropped roughly 20% in recent weeks amid weak jobs data and other economic indicators that have renewed fears of a global slowdown, yet remain high by historical standards,
Posted by 2:00 AM
atLabels: Uncategorized
Subscribe to: Posts