Showing posts with label Inclusive Growth. Show all posts
Sunday, December 4, 2016
Thirty years ago, a distinguished group of economists advocated a ‘two-handed’ approach to unemployment that targeted supply as much as demand. This column examines recent work on the effectiveness of cyclical and structural policies – the two ‘hands’ – targeting unemployment in Europe. It further considers the pressures from greater integration of capital and labour markets on the success of these reforms. Cyclical measures, particularly the easing of monetary policy, have been successful, but further structural reforms are still needed in many countries where average unemployment remains too high.
Read the rest at Vox.
Figure 1. Actual and predicted changes in unemployment, advanced economies, 2010 to 2015
Notes: The chart compares the actual change in unemployment in each country with what could have been predicted on the basis of the hisotrical relationship between unemployment and output (Okun’s Law).
Thirty years ago, a distinguished group of economists advocated a ‘two-handed’ approach to unemployment that targeted supply as much as demand. This column examines recent work on the effectiveness of cyclical and structural policies – the two ‘hands’ – targeting unemployment in Europe. It further considers the pressures from greater integration of capital and labour markets on the success of these reforms. Cyclical measures, particularly the easing of monetary policy, have been successful, but further structural reforms are still needed in many countries where average unemployment remains too high.
Posted by 10:45 PM
atLabels: Inclusive Growth
Monday, November 21, 2016
The latest update of the International Jobs Report shows that:
Read the full report.
The latest update of the International Jobs Report shows that:
Posted by 2:47 PM
atLabels: Inclusive Growth
Sunday, November 6, 2016
Paul Krugman wrote in 2011 that unemployment was high “because growth is weak — period, full stop, end of story.” Six years later, has he been proven right? Read my post for Econbrowser to get the answer.
Paul Krugman wrote in 2011 that unemployment was high “because growth is weak — period, full stop, end of story.” Six years later, has he been proven right? Read my post for Econbrowser to get the answer.
Posted by 7:55 AM
atLabels: Inclusive Growth
Sunday, October 23, 2016
Fear of “others” taking “our” jobs is a staple of economic discourse. Sometimes it is a fear of China, sometimes of robots; today it is a fear of the effects of Chinese investment in robots. Digital technology and the ‘sharing’ economy have transformed the world of work, but they have also fueled familiar fears about the impact of technology on jobs.
Technological advancements boost productivity, the demand for labor and the quantity and quality of jobs. They contribute to national and global long-run efficiency and more arguably, to long-run equity at a global level.
But along with these benefits, policymakers must acknowledge and address the displacement that results from the use of new technology. Without appropriate policy frameworks to manage these changes, fears about the short-run job losses will trump the longer-run benefits of technology adoption.
In the last few years, the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) policy advice is increasingly geared toward balancing the efficiency and equity effects of labor market developments. The evolution in its thinking and advice has three aspects, and is pertinent to how policymakers deal with labor market impacts of new technology.
First, more so now than in the past, the IMF is paying attention to the distributional consequences of economic developments and policies. Second, its framework for thinking about labor market policies is one that increasingly recognizes that many policies need to strike a balance between promoting efficiency and protecting the basic needs of workers. Third, the institution has tried to elevate the importance of job creation in policy discussions with a ‘two-handed’ approach – one that recognizes the importance of both aggregate demand and aggregate supply, and advocates policies to boost both.
This evolution bodes well for the IMF’s ability to offer good advice on employment, including how to manage the effects of technology on the quantity and quality of jobs.
Continue reading here.
Fear of “others” taking “our” jobs is a staple of economic discourse. Sometimes it is a fear of China, sometimes of robots; today it is a fear of the effects of Chinese investment in robots. Digital technology and the ‘sharing’ economy have transformed the world of work, but they have also fueled familiar fears about the impact of technology on jobs.
Technological advancements boost productivity, the demand for labor and the quantity and quality of jobs.
Posted by 10:01 AM
atLabels: Inclusive Growth
From Just Jobs Network:
Technology is fundamentally reshaping the nature of work worldwide, spurring heated debate. While some worry that deepening automation and the rapid growth of online and “on-demand” labor platforms are eroding job quantity and quality, others claim that productivity gains will translate into more and better jobs in the long run. With its 2016 signature volume, JustJobs Network introduces real case studies from around the world, examining how technology in its different dimensions is changing employment outcomes.
Click here to see the report.
From Just Jobs Network:
Technology is fundamentally reshaping the nature of work worldwide, spurring heated debate. While some worry that deepening automation and the rapid growth of online and “on-demand” labor platforms are eroding job quantity and quality, others claim that productivity gains will translate into more and better jobs in the long run. With its 2016 signature volume, JustJobs Network introduces real case studies from around the world, examining how technology in its different dimensions is changing employment outcomes.
Posted by 9:54 AM
atLabels: Inclusive Growth
Subscribe to: Posts