The Unassuming Economist

From a paper by Krishantha Wisenthige, Heshan Sameera Kankanam Pathiranage, and Ruwan Jayathilaka:

“This study delves into the rationale behind the tendency of nations in the Middle East and Central Asia (MECA) to seek aid from the IMF. The IMF supports global financial stability, aiming to foster economic growth and prosperity across its member countries by promoting policies that encourage monetary cooperation and financial resilience. The study employs a conditional fixed-effects logit model, the analysis spans 22 years of data from twenty-five MECA countries to identify the factors driving these nations to seek IMF assistance. It focuses on six determinants: Current Account Balance (CAB), Inflation (INF), Corruption (CORR), General Government Net Lending and Borrowing (GGNLB), General Government Gross Debt (GGGD), and Gross Domestic Product Growth (GDPG). The fixed-effects logit shows that slower GDP growth raises the odds of an IMF programme, while short-run changes in corruption control and public debt ratios are not significant once country and year effects are absorbed. Inflation is weakly positive; the current account balance is still insignificant. A post-GFC and an income-group robustness check confirm the pattern. Furthermore, the study identifies Lebanon, a lower-middle-income country, as a leading example of seeking IMF assistance during the study period. Overall, this research highlights the importance of policymakers understanding the dynamics and rankings within the MECA region to effectively address economic challenges, provide financial support, and foster a more sustainable economic structure.”

From a paper by William Gale, Ian Berlin, and Sam Thorpe:

“How should the United States respond to its unsustainable fiscal outlook? How and when a country should fiscally consolidate depends on its existing circumstances, policies, and institutions. We review the experiences of other countries that attempted consolidations and highlight lessons applicable to the United States. We find that (1) the United States does not face a short-term crisis, so it can employ gradual adjustments, which may minimize short-term harm, (2) consolidation should occur in a strong economy with monetary accommodation, and (3) tax increases (spending cuts) could plausibly play a larger (smaller) role in US consolidations than in European adjustments.”

From a paper by Simona E. Cociuba and James C. MacGee:

“Demographic projections show the majority of OECD economies will see declines in their working-age populations in the coming decades. This is potentially problematic, since young workers account for a large share of net labor reallocation between growing and shrinking industries. To examine if sectoral reallocation costs are exacerbated by an aging population, we develop a three-sector perpetual youth search model with sector-specific human capital. Our model features two interconnected frictions: sectoral preference, which implies that only some workers are mobile across sectors, and a wage bargaining distortion, whereby mobile workers’ outside option of searching in the growing sector dampens the fall in shrinking sector wages, leading to rest unemployment. In our parametrized model, as population growth declines from 3 to  percent, output losses from a one-time reallocation shock of 3 percentage points increase seven-fold to nearly 10 percent of annual GDP, and there are extended periods of high unemployment and low vacancies.”

From a paper by Michał Brzozowski and Joanna Siwińska-Gorzelak:

“This article examines the impact of robotization on the short-term correlation between employment and output. We estimate the Okun’s Law relationship utilizing panel data from 35 OECD countries for the period from 1996 to 2020. Our empirical evidence, backed up by a battery of robustness tests, consistently shows that automation contributes to job-preserving recessions by mitigating increases in unemployment during economic contractions. This challenges common assumptions regarding the detrimental impact of automation on employment. Additionally, we do not find support for the notion that automation causes jobless recoveries.”

From a paper by Karen Dynan and Douglas Elmendorf:

“This paper simulates economic developments as if the discretionary fiscal stimulus enacted in the
past two recessions had not occurred and additional automatic fiscal stabilizers had been deployed
instead. For the calibration of key economic relationships most consistent with the empirical
literature, we find that more sustained fiscal stimulus would have pushed unemployment down
more rapidly following the Great Recession and that more limited stimulus would have caused
inflation to increase much less following the COVID recession. We caution, though, that our
estimates are uncertain given the large number of assumptions embedded in the calculations. Under
different assumptions about the supply side of the economy when resource utilization is high, the
stimulus enacted in early 2021 was not a significant cause of the observed runup in inflation that
followed, and substituting an automatic stabilizer would have made little difference to inflation.”