The Unassuming Economist

From a paper by Monsoï Kenneth Colombiano Kponou:

“This article examines the effect of gender role perceptions on the quality of women’s participation in the labor market across six Sahelian countries: Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, Mauritania, Niger and Senegal. Using data from the demographic and health survey (DHS) to ensure comparability, the perception of gender roles was measured through a composite index. The study analyzed its effect on two employment outcomes: (i) employment sector, and (iii) remuneration mode. The findings indicate that gender roles significantly influence women’s labor market participation, specifically increasing the likelihood of women doing vulnerable jobs. Our results highlight the importance of strengthening policies that support girls’ education. Additionally, there is a need to restructure jobs to address the unique constraints faced by different groups of economic agents, including tailored incentives to promote work-life balance, especially for women.”

From a paper by Zixiang Qi, Bicong Wang, and Yaxin Wang:

“According to the increasing marginal tendency towards tax avoidance, we develop a macro theoretical model and derive an optimal path of economic growth using only dimensionless parameters, which illustrates an inverted U-shaped effect of income inequality on economic growth in the long run. Specifically, economic growth initially moves upwards and subsequently downwards as the Gini coefficient increases. Moreover, this study presents empirical evidence via dynamic GMM estimates based on instrumental variables and PMG estimates relying on cointegration analyses, consistent with the implications of our theoretical model.”

From a paper by Robert Holzmann:

“After the global financial crisis and until 2021, the primary objective of central banks in advanced economies was to implement policies aimed at increasing inflation, given that inflation had been too low for too long. Having reached the effective lower bound (ELB) of nominal interest rates, monetary policy had to resort to unconventional monetary policy (UMP) measures, which were not without negative side effects. In response to the rise in inflation in 2021, central banks returned to policy interest rates as their primary monetary policy tool and began to unwind their set of UMP measures. Assuming that inflation has been tamed, will we be able to maintain sufficient distance from the ELB to rely broadly on policy rates? Or will we again be forced to implement UMP with all its side effects and proportionality issues? Part I of the paper outlines the rationale and instruments of UMP: how it was supposed to work and how it actually worked, including its negative side effects. Part II considers alternative monetary policy options in a low inflation environment that prove limited and little convincing. The paper ends by discussing how prolonged use of UMP impacts on central bank profitability and central bank independence, also offering possible remedies.”

From a paper by Shrimoyee Ganguly and Rajat Acharyya:

“Interest rate hike as an instrument for inflation-targeting has been adopted quite aggressively in recent times by the Fed Bank of the United States, which has some far-reaching implications for emerging market economies like India. In such a context, this article explores implications of interest rate hike by a large foreign country for wage inequality between skilled and unskilled workers in a domestic economy. We focus on the supply side channel: hike in foreign interest rate affecting wage inequality through its impact on domestic investment, capital formation and consequent changes in the composition of aggregate output. We show that the wage inequality worsens if capital-cost share in a composite traded good is larger than the capital-cost share in a skill-based export-good Z. Domestic policies such as credit expansion by changing the cash-reserve ratio and increase in money supply help mitigate this worsening wage-inequality effect of interest hike abroad. This issue assumes relevance because of rising concerns among the major central banks the world over about the income distributional impacts of monetary policies, whereas most of the recent income inequality trends seem to have been contributed largely by rising skill premiums.”

From ET Edge Insights:

“India’s Industrial Park development is an important driver of economic development, but its importance goes beyond financial growth. It can change the urban environment to be a sustainable, resilient, and inclusive ecosystem, directly contributing to SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities. Embedding sustainability, smart planning, and green practices, industrial parks can harmonize industrial activity with urban well-being.

Urban growth through planned industrial parks

One of the key means by which industrial parks help support SDG 11 is planned urbanization. Aggregating industries prevents it from all haphazard sprawls and prevents much stress on the built-up infrastructure of a city or town. For instance, the Dahej PCPIR region located in the state of Gujarat covers nearly 450 square kilometres that have been well planned into an industrial cluster to keep maximum use of the land on the one hand, which would cause minimum displacement on the lands adjacent to the industry cluster.

Industrial Park integrates urban planning by providing residential zones, green spaces, and the services to be provided for workers. This planned approach goes along with SDG 11.3 and is dedicated to sustainable urbanization, in which participatory planning aims for harmonious coexistence between the industrial and the urban.

Inclusive growth and social development

An Industrial Park is more than just industries – it’s an ecosystem. This will foster inclusive development; these entities will actually be producing jobs, developing entrepreneurs, and upgrading living standards within a region.

Furthermore, Industrial Parks generally trigger the growth of supportive infrastructures like schools, hospitals, and houses. Industrial parks have witnessed the establishment of educational and health facilities for the benefit of the local people. The infrastructure developments support SDG 11.1 by giving access to basic and affordable housing and services.”

Continue reading here.