The Unassuming Economist

From a paper by Ichrak Dridi and Mohamed Malek Belhoula:

“Following the global financial crisis, the interconnection between financial stability and inflation stability has gained increasing recognition, challenging the notion that these objectives are mutually exclusive. This study empirically examines whether central banks, through the adoption of Full-Fledged Inflation Targeting (FFIT), can enhance stock market efficiency in emerging economies. Utilizing data from 36 emerging markets over the period 1995:Q1 to 2024:Q1, we employ Propensity Score Matching to mitigate self-selection and omitted variable biases. Our findings demonstrate that FFIT significantly improves stock market efficiency, with effects emerging after three quarters and persisting for at least two years, as substantiated by Staggered Difference-in-Differences analysis. These results remain robust across multiple sensitivity tests. Mediation analysis confirms that FFIT enhances efficiency primarily through reduced inflation and interest rate volatility and strengthened institutional credibility. Furthermore, results reveal that IT adoption also enhanced efficiency during the Global Financial Crisis and COVID-19, albeit with a lower amplitude compared to the full-sample analysis. By stabilizing inflation expectations and providing transparent policy guidance, FFIT enables investors to incorporate macroeconomic fundamentals into their decision-making, thereby enhancing market transparency and improving stock market efficiency.”

From a paper by Mihaela Simionescu:

“The Covid-19 pandemic enhanced economic issues like income/wealth inequality and inflation, with negative consequences that should be managed properly by policymakers. The relationship between inflation and economic inequality has been extensively studied, primarily through the lens of income disparities. However, the implications for wealth inequality, a more potent determinant of economic opportunity, social mobility, and political influence, remain under-explored. This study bridges this gap by empirically investigating the nonlinear association between inflation and income/wealth inequality, as proxied by top/bottom income/wealth shares in the EU in the period 1990–2022. The findings reveal a non-linear, U-shaped, association between inflation/expected inflation and top/bottom wealth and income shares for the overall EU, while inflation has no significant impact on the Gini index. However, there are few countries for which the U pattern is not validated. In addition, in general, joining the Eurozone decreased income and wealth inequality, and did not affect the wealth and income of the bottom 50% of the population. To elucidate the underlying mechanisms, a pathway analysis is conducted, suggesting that self-employment plays a pivotal role in transmitting the effects of inflation to income/wealth inequality. Moreover, immigration has a partial mediation effect in the relationship between wealth inequality and education.”

From a paper by Floris Bukman:

“Military coups are a persistent feature of global politics, with nearly 90 incidents recorded worldwide between 1996 and 2023, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. Such events typically disrupt economic performance, causing declines in GDP growth, high inflation rates, reduced foreign direct investment (FDI), and increased unemployment. However, the severity and duration of these economic outcomes vary significantly across countries. This thesis addresses this gap by investigating whether institutional quality, measured by government effectiveness, moderates the short- to medium-term economic impacts of coups. Using a fixed-effects panel regression model covering all UN member states from 1996 to 2023, the findings suggest that countries with stronger institutions are better able to mitigate the typically negative economic effects of coups. These countries experience faster GDP growth recoveries, particularly evident in the second year after the coup and, in some contexts, as early as the first year. For inflation, FDI, and unemployment, the moderating effect of institutional quality was not statistically significant. By emphasising the important role of institutional quality following political instability, this research provides new insights into why some countries experience less severe economic impact and recover more quickly from military coups than others, and it offers directions for future research.”

From a paper by Supipi Hansika, Priyan Navamohan, Dinuli Gamage, Ridmi Madurawala &  Ruwan Jayathilaka:

“In the modern world, exploring economic uncertainty and the unpredictability in economic conditions is crucial to determine its impact on day-to-day society. However, existing literature has examined this relationship in a generalised manner, often without focusing on the bi-directional effects among these variables. This study explores the causal and cointegrating interrelationships among economic uncertainty and suicide rates, unemployment rates, economic growth, and trade openness across 30 high uncertainty countries utilising Granger causality test and Cointegration test. Unlike existing studies, which focus on a certain country or region, the current findings disclose bi-directional causation between the measured variables, particularly in Kenya, Finland, Portugal, Latvia, Peru, Haiti, Mexico, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyz Republic. The cointegration tests show that while uncertainty reduces economic growth and trade openness in the long run, in line with contemporary literature, uncertainty also reduces suicide rates and unemployment rates in the long term. By analysing the countries with the highest economic uncertainty, this study aims to provide country-specific policies in line with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) developed by United Nations (UN) to navigate the bi-directional effects among economic uncertainty and the linked variables.”

This article first appeared in the India@100 special issue of Business Today. Here is a link to the image of the article. The full text is provided below:

In 1500, India was one of the advanced economies of the world. Now, it is trying to make it way back into the advanced countries’ club. India is the fastest-growing major economy in the world, and is expected to contribute a remarkable 20 percent of global growth in the coming years (Econofact, 2025). It would be felicitous if the re-entry happened by 2047, a 100 years after independence.

But re-entry will be a remarkable achievement even if it occurs a couple of years or even a couple of decades later. Growth is a marathon race, not a sprint.

A question for policymakers to ponder in the interim is: how can India’s stay in the club be a durable one? What does economic theory and country experience teach us about why some countries become permanent residents of the club, while others go in and out, as though on a tourist visa? 

When thinking about the lessons from economic theory, I am reminded of the time my American wife first expressed an interest in cooking Indian food. Delighted by her interest, I purchased a cookbook by Madhur Jaffrey. Her wonderful recipes provided not just the list of ingredients, but specified the size of the pot or pan my wife should use, the sequence in which to put in the ingredients and exactly how long to stir them. The result was a reliably-delicious gravy. Other cookbooks were less helpful. One of them, which we joke about to this day, simply instructed her to throw all the ingredients simultaneously into a pot of unspecified size and “stir until the gravy is highly delicious”.

Economic cookbooks are sadly of the latter variety. In 2001, the World Bank assembled a group of Masterchefs and asked them to come up with a reliable recipe for growing the economic pie. The group included Nobel laureates like Michael Spence and top policymakers like India’s own Montek Singh Ahluwalia. The group identified the common features of the growth miracles of their time, like that of China. Most of these features turned out to be the expected ones, much like the tomatoes and onions of an Indian gravy. One feature was prudent macroeconomic policy; fiscal deficits and inflation had to be contained to keep the growth party going for long. Another feature was openness: countries with durable growth remained open to trade, technology and expertise from the rest of the world.

But the so-called Spence report  also revealed a common feature that the chefs weren’t expecting: this secret ingredient is inclusion. Countries with durable growth were more likely to be ones where  growth during the miracle years included broad segments of the society, instead of being confined to particular income classes, sectors, regions or gender.  By this metric, India is in great shape. Growth has been associated with remarkable declines in poverty (The Economist, 2025) and no increase, if any, in income inequality. Women’s participation in the economy has increased substantially. and growth has been shared across  states and has included both urban and rural areas (Balasubramanian, Loungani and Kumar, 2021). On all these fronts, there is much room for further improvement, but it is also important to take note of, and rejoice in, the fact that India has achieved not just a growth miracle’ but an ‘inclusive growth miracle’ (Ahluwalia, 2001).  

If past experience remains a reliable guide, the inclusive nature of India’s growth raises the odds that its’ stay in the rich countries’ club will be a durable one.

The author is the Director of the M.S. in Applied Economics program at Johns Hopkins University, where he teaches a course on Economic Growth (jointly with Karan Bhasin). He is the author of Confronting inequality: How Societies Can choose inclusive Growth (Columbia University Press, 2019).