Showing posts with label Global Housing Watch. Show all posts
Friday, February 7, 2025
Working papers and conferences:
On the US—developments on house prices, rent, permits and mortgage:
On the US—other developments:
On Australia and New Zealand:
On other countries:
Working papers and conferences:
Posted by 5:00 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Sunday, February 2, 2025
From a paper by Nestor Garza, Ivo Gasic, Clemente Larrain:
“This paper aims to build a set of long-term, geographically controlled land value indices for Santiago de Chile, with which to test land rent theory predictions regarding macroeconomic impacts. This paper uses a geographic cluster approach to the Laspeyres estimator, weighted by the stock of available land plots and their market offers per zone, to create two quarterly land value indices for Gran Santiago during the period 1983Q4–2016Q2. Subsequently, this paper implements dynamic time series methods (Vector Error Correction) as a baseline to determine the effect of economic performance and interest rate on urban land values. The two land value indices are correctly predicted by economic and interest rate shocks, as theoretically expected. In addition, this paper found that land values grew faster-than-predicted during the period of the so-called “Chilean Miracle” (1992–1998), a situation associated in the literature with worsened housing affordability and socio-spatial inequality.”
From a paper by Nestor Garza, Ivo Gasic, Clemente Larrain:
“This paper aims to build a set of long-term, geographically controlled land value indices for Santiago de Chile, with which to test land rent theory predictions regarding macroeconomic impacts. This paper uses a geographic cluster approach to the Laspeyres estimator, weighted by the stock of available land plots and their market offers per zone, to create two quarterly land value indices for Gran Santiago during the period 1983Q4–2016Q2.
Posted by 2:25 PM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch, Inclusive Growth
Saturday, February 1, 2025
From a paper by Alessandra Fogli, Veronica Guerrieri, Mark Ponder, and Marta Prato:
“Since the 1980s, the US has experienced not only a steady increase in income inequality, but also a contemporaneous rise in residential segregation by income. What is the relationship between inequality and residential segregation? How does it affect intergenerational mobility? We first document a positive correlation between inequality and segregation, both over time and across metro areas. We then develop a general equilibrium model where parents choose the neighborhood where they raise their children and invest in their children’s education. In the model, segregation and inequality amplify each other because of a local spillover that affects the return to education. We calibrate the model to a representative US metro in 1980 and use the micro estimates of neighborhood exposure effects in Chetty and Hendren (2018b) to discipline the strength of the local spillover. We first use the calibrated version of the model to explore the economy’s response to an unexpected skill premium shock. We find that segregation dynamics played a significant role in amplifying the increase in inequality and in dampening intergenerational mobility. We then use the model to explore the effects of policies designed to move poor families to better neighborhoods, like the Moving To Opportunity (MTO) program. We show that scaling up MTO policies induces general equilibrium effects that limit their efficacy.”
From a paper by Alessandra Fogli, Veronica Guerrieri, Mark Ponder, and Marta Prato:
“Since the 1980s, the US has experienced not only a steady increase in income inequality, but also a contemporaneous rise in residential segregation by income. What is the relationship between inequality and residential segregation? How does it affect intergenerational mobility? We first document a positive correlation between inequality and segregation, both over time and across metro areas. We then develop a general equilibrium model where parents choose the neighborhood where they raise their children and invest in their children’s education.
Posted by 12:06 PM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch, Inclusive Growth
From a paper by Nafeesa Yunus:
“This study examines the impact of aggregate oil shocks and disentangled oil shocks on U.S. and seven major securitized real estate markets. Oil is integrated with the markets and leads them over the long-run. The short-run impact of oil shocks on the markets is negative. A disentangled analysis of oil shocks reveals that supply and demand shocks have differential impacts. Over the long-run, supply shocks have little impact, while demand shocks contribute significantly to common trends and lead each market. In the short-run, demand shocks have positive effects on each market, whereas supply shocks have negative but lesser effects.”
From a paper by Nafeesa Yunus:
“This study examines the impact of aggregate oil shocks and disentangled oil shocks on U.S. and seven major securitized real estate markets. Oil is integrated with the markets and leads them over the long-run. The short-run impact of oil shocks on the markets is negative. A disentangled analysis of oil shocks reveals that supply and demand shocks have differential impacts. Over the long-run, supply shocks have little impact,
Posted by 4:59 AM
atFrom C40 Cities:
“New research from C40 Cities today reveals that making the construction sector more sustainable in cities will generate multiple socio-economic benefits, including the creation of millions of green jobs.
Building greener cities: green job opportunities in clean construction, is the first major piece of work to identify the potential for cities’ workforces of adopting clean construction, presenting a compelling economic case for shifting to clean construction practices. The research, supported by Laudes Foundation and the City of Oslo, and with insights from Building and Woodworkers International, spans seven major cities: Bogotá, London, Madrid, Mexico City, Nairobi, Oslo and Seattle, to give a global perspective on how decarbonising the built environment, responsible currently for close to 40% of global CO2 emissions, can support a stable and healthy workforce and provide opportunities for greater social equity.
Researchers modelled the impact of two scenarios from 2023-2050: first, a city’s continuation of current carbon-intensive construction scenario, and second, a shift towards clean construction (defined as decarbonised, resource-efficient, resilient and socially just built environment and construction systems). The research projects the changes in job numbers and job roles, maps workforce diversity and quality of work, and calculates the investment needed for each.”
Continue reading here.
From C40 Cities:
“New research from C40 Cities today reveals that making the construction sector more sustainable in cities will generate multiple socio-economic benefits, including the creation of millions of green jobs.
Building greener cities: green job opportunities in clean construction, is the first major piece of work to identify the potential for cities’ workforces of adopting clean construction, presenting a compelling economic case for shifting to clean construction practices.
Posted by 4:45 AM
atLabels: Global Housing Watch
Subscribe to: Posts