Showing posts with label Forecasting Forum. Show all posts
Tuesday, February 27, 2018
From a new blog by Mark J. Perry:
“In Warren Buffett’s 2017 annual letter to shareholders, released on Saturday, he discussed the ten-year bet he made in 2007 that an unmanaged, low-cost S&P-500 index fund would out-perform an actively managed group of high-cost hedge funds over a ten-year period from 2008 to 2017, when performance is measured on a basis net of fees, costs, and all expenses. See posts here, here and here for past coverage of Buffett’s famous bet.”
From a new blog by Mark J. Perry:
“In Warren Buffett’s 2017 annual letter to shareholders, released on Saturday, he discussed the ten-year bet he made in 2007 that an unmanaged, low-cost S&P-500 index fund would out-perform an actively managed group of high-cost hedge funds over a ten-year period from 2008 to 2017, when performance is measured on a basis net of fees, costs, and all expenses.
Posted by at 6:17 AM
Labels: Forecasting Forum, Macro Demystified
Thursday, February 1, 2018
In 2000, I wrote in the Financial Times that “the record of failure to predict recessions is virtually unblemished.” In time for Groundhog Day, my colleague Zidong An, Joao Jalles and I have updated my analysis so that it now covers the years 1992 to 2014 and 63 countries. We find that there is little reason to change my assessment. Like Bill Murray, I am reliving the same moment.
In 2000, I wrote in the Financial Times that “the record of failure to predict recessions is virtually unblemished.” In time for Groundhog Day, my colleague Zidong An, Joao Jalles and I have updated my analysis so that it now covers the years 1992 to 2014 and 63 countries. We find that there is little reason to change my assessment. Like Bill Murray, I am reliving the same moment.
Posted by at 10:53 AM
Labels: Forecasting Forum
Wednesday, January 24, 2018
FocusEconomics announces the winners of our 2017 Analyst Forecast Awards. “The Awards recognize the most accurate forecasters for the main macroeconomic indicators across 87 countries and 29 commodity prices in 2016. Details of the awards and the list of winners are available at: www.focus-economics.com/awards.”
FocusEconomics announces the winners of our 2017 Analyst Forecast Awards. “The Awards recognize the most accurate forecasters for the main macroeconomic indicators across 87 countries and 29 commodity prices in 2016. Details of the awards and the list of winners are available at: www.focus-economics.com/awards.”
Posted by at 6:43 PM
Labels: Forecasting Forum
Thursday, January 4, 2018
In a new paper, Daniel Aromi shows that “excessive optimism after the arrival of positive information” for a few years about a country’s prospects can lead to large forecast errors when the information turns negative but forecasts don’t.
“[…] some years before the Asian crisis, Krugman (1994) warned against ‘popular enthusiasm about Asia’s boom’. More recently, Pritchett and Summers (2014) indicate that growth expectations regarding the Chinese and Indian economies might suffer from excessive extrapolation of recent trajectories. In addition to these warnings, further motivation is provided by macroeconomic episodes in which improved economic prospects are followed by crises. For instance, several European economies, among them Greece and Ireland, went through this type of trajectory. Another case is given by recent events in Brazil, where prominent optimism regarding economic prospects was later proven wrong in a stark manner.”
“The empirical analysis shows a significant association between mean forecast errors and earlier information flows. The sign of the documented relationship is consistent with the overreaction hypothesis. More positive information is followed, on average, by higher forecast errors, that is, by increments in the mean difference between forecast growth and realized growth.”
“It is worth noting that the strongest evidence is documented for information flows and forecasts errors that are between 4 and 8 years apart. In other words, the evidence indicates the presence of a process that develops at a frequency that is lower than the usual business cycle frequency.”
“This work documents the presence of systematic errors in growth forecasts. Mean forecast errors are positively associated with the tone of information flows observed in previous periods.”
“The inefficient use of information and the associated errors in decision-making could explain economically significant aggregate fluctuations. In particular, excessive optimism after the arrival of positive information can contribute to the emergence of vulnerabilities that increase the likelihood of economic crises.”
The article is available from the International Finance.
In a new paper, Daniel Aromi shows that “excessive optimism after the arrival of positive information” for a few years about a country’s prospects can lead to large forecast errors when the information turns negative but forecasts don’t.
“[…] some years before the Asian crisis, Krugman (1994) warned against ‘popular enthusiasm about Asia’s boom’. More recently, Pritchett and Summers (2014) indicate that growth expectations regarding the Chinese and Indian economies might suffer from excessive extrapolation of recent trajectories.
Posted by at 10:41 AM
Labels: Forecasting Forum
The noted econometrician writes: “The intermittent failure of economic forecasts to ‘foresee’ the future reflects both imperfect knowledge and a non-stationary and evolving world that is far from ‘general equilibrium’ and closer to ‘general disequilibrium’.”
“[This has] disastrous consequences for dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) systems, which transpire to be the least structural of all possible model forms as their derivation entails they are bound to ‘break down’ when the underlying distributions of economic variables shift. This serious problem is highlighted by Hendry and Muellbauer (2017) in their critique of the Bank of England quarterly econometric model (BEQEM–pronounced Beckem: […] a DSGE which, as in the film ‘Bend it Like Beckham’, bent in the Financial Crisis, but so much that it broke and had to be replaced.”
“Surprisingly, despite that abject failure, it was replaced by yet another DSGE (COMPASS: Central Organising Model for Projection Analysis and Scenario Simulation […]. Unfortunately, […] COMPASS had already failed to characterize data available before it was even developed. Persisting with such an approach introduces a triple whammy as:
a] the derivations sustaining DSGEs use an invalid mathematical basis;
b] imposing a so-called ‘equilibrium’ fails to take account of past shifts;
c] the DSGE approach assumes agents act in the same incorrect way as the modeller, so assumes agents have failed to learn that imperfect knowledge about location shifts forces revisions to their plans.”
“During a visit to LSE in 2009, Queen Elizabeth II asked Luis Garicano “why did no one see the credit crisis coming?” to which a part of his answer should have been that DSGE models dominated economic agencies and essentially ruled out such major financial crises by assuming away imperfect knowledge. Prakash Loungani (2001) argued “The record of failure to predict recessions is virtually unblemished.””
The article is available from the here.
The noted econometrician writes: “The intermittent failure of economic forecasts to ‘foresee’ the future reflects both imperfect knowledge and a non-stationary and evolving world that is far from ‘general equilibrium’ and closer to ‘general disequilibrium’.”
“[This has] disastrous consequences for dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) systems, which transpire to be the least structural of all possible model forms as their derivation entails they are bound to ‘break down’ when the underlying distributions of economic variables shift.
Posted by at 10:33 AM
Labels: Forecasting Forum
Subscribe to: Posts